1. Primary objective: Survival results of LT in patients with severe ACLF To compare 1-year graft and patient survival rates after LT in patients with ACLF-2 or 3 at the time of LT with patients with decompensated cirrhosis without ACLF 2-3 and…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Hepatic and hepatobiliary disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Primary endpoint
1-year graft and patient survival rates after liver transplantation
Secondary outcome
Secondary endpoints
Pre-Liver transplantation
Waiting time (from the listing to LT, days)
Mortality rate on the waiting list
Delisting rate on the waiting list
Clinical course (resolution/improvement/stabilization/worsening) of ACLF on the
waiting list (evolution of grades, number of organ failures)
Incidence of ACLF development in patients listed without ACLF
Resources utilization on the waiting list
Post-Liver transplantation
3-month and 6-month graft and patient survival rates after liver
transplantation
Hospital length of stay after LT (days)
ICU length of stay after LT (days)
3-month and 1-year health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after LT (by Chronic
Liver Disease Questionnaire [CLDQ] and EQ-5D)
3-month, 6-month and 1-year rate of dependency of renal replacement therapy or
kidney transplant
Resources utilization of LT and post-LT follow-up
Background summary
Patients with acute decompensation of cirrhosis are a heterogeneous clinical
group associated with different prognoses which need to be stratified to define
appropriate management. The term *Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF)*
characterizes a subgroup of patients with chronic liver diseases which develop
organ failure(s) leading to very poor short-term outcome. Several tools for
estimating outcomes of patients with ACLF have been developed.
The management of ACLF per se is mainly supportive with intensive monitoring
and supports of failing organs. Clinical deterioration despite maximal
supportive management is associated with very poor outcomes and leads
physicians to consider potential salvage liver transplantation (LT).
This option remains highly controversial. LT in sicker recipients is
unquestionably associated with an improved survival benefit but could result in
less acceptable longer-term survival rates after LT. Due to the scarcity of
deceased liver donors, we need a strategy of rationing where the success of
deceased-donor LT (DDLT) will be maximized.
A Patients listed with ACLF-3 has a high probability to die on the waiting list
(WL) or be removed from the WL. Thus, we must define predictive factors of
death or removal from the WL for patients with severe ACLF based on prospective
data to try to design better rule for organ allocation for this group of
patients. This especially in the context of scarcity of liver donors, the
potential benefit of LT in ACLF patients must also be balanced against the need
for rationing of limited resources.
Prospective data from large multicenter international studies are urgently
needed, aiming to resolve objectively this controversial ethical issue that
results either in wasting scarce organ resources or in precluding severely sick
patient*s access to life-saving treatment.
This CHANCE study aims to develop new biomarkers to predict the prognosis on
the waiting list and after LT for patients with decompensated cirrhosis with or
without ACLF-2 or 3, to investigate the impact of LT on systemic disturbances
(inflammation, leukocyte dysfunction, metabolic alterations, dysbiosis)
observed in ACLF and to explore the mechanisms of liver and extrahepatic organ
recovery after LT in patients with ACLF-2 or 3 and determinants of this
recovery.
Study objective
1. Primary objective: Survival results of LT in patients with severe ACLF
To compare 1-year graft and patient survival rates after LT in patients
with ACLF-2 or 3 at the time of LT with patients with decompensated
cirrhosis without ACLF 2-3 and transplant-free survival of patients
with ACLF-2 or 3 not listed for LT.
2. Secondary objectives
1) To define the factors in decision-making process for listing patients
with severe ACLF; in particular to assess the proportion of patients
with ACLF-2 or 3 referred to transplant team who are listed or
not and reasons of not listing.
2) To analyze the clinical course of patients listed with ACLF-2 or 3 on
the waiting list compared with those of patients listed with
decompensated cirrhosis without ACLF-2 or 3.
3) To define independent predictive factors of death/delisting on the
waiting list for patients listed with ACLF-2 or 3 and develop a new
prognostic model based on ACLF criteria to predict mortality
on the waiting list and to improve the allocation of organs.
4) To compare the characteristics of accepted grafts for patients listed
with ACLF-2 or 3 with those of patients listed with decompensated
cirrhosis without ACLF-2 or 3 and their impact on post-LT
outcomes.
5) To explore independent predictive factors of death after LT for
patients transplanted with ACLF-2 or 3 to design futility criteria for LT.
6) To compare post-LT survival rates of patients with ACLF-2 or 3 at
listing and patients without ACLF at listing who develop ACLF-2 or 3 on
the waiting list.
7) To compare post-LT quality of life (QoL) for patients listed with
ACLF-2 or 3 with those of patients listed with decompensated cirrhosis
without ACLF-2 or 3.
8) To assess the resources utilization of care and LT procedure in
patients listed with ACLF-2 or 3 (in intention-to-treat and per protocol)
compared with patients listed with decompensated cirrhosis
without ACLF-2 or 3.
3. Exploratory objectives
1) To develop new biomarkers to predict the prognosis on the waiting list
and after LT for patients with decompensated cirrhosis with or
without ACLF-2 or 3.
2) To investigate the impact of LT on systemic disturbances (inflammation,
leukocyte dysfunction, metabolic alterations) observed in ACLF.
3) To explore the mechanisms of liver and extrahepatic organ recovery
after LT in patients with ACLF-2 or 3 and determinants of this
recovery.
*
Study design
Prospective non-interventional observational study
Study burden and risks
The current study does not pose any significant risk to the patients and the
only burden is collection of blood, urine, liver tissue and saliva.
The study has no direct benefit for the included subjects. The results of this
study may result in a substantial improvement in knowledge about pathogenesis,
prognosis and treatment.
Travessera de Gràcia 11 planta 7a
Barcelona 08021
ES
Travessera de Gràcia 11 planta 7a
Barcelona 08021
ES
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
1. Male or female subject >=18 years of age.
2. Subjects with diagnosis of liver cirrhosis (based on clinical, laboratory,
endoscopic, and ultrasonographic features or on histology).
3. Subjects who have been hospitalized for acute decompensation of liver
cirrhosis and referred to the transplant team:
o Group 1: patients listed for liver transplantation with ACLF-2 or 3
at the time of listing or developing ACLF 2-3 while on the waiting
list.
o Group 2: patients listed for liver transplantation with
decompensated cirrhosis without ACLF-2 or 3 and poor liver function
(MELD>20) at the time of listing.
o Group 3: patients having ACLF-2 or 3, are assessed for inclusion in
the waiting list, but are finally not listed for liver transplantation.
4. Patients (or trusted person, family member or close relation if the patient
is unable to express consent) who have been informed and
signed their informed consent
Exclusion criteria
1. Acute or subacute liver failure without underlying cirrhosis.
2. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma outside Milan criteria or other
active neoplasia.
3. Subjects listed for transplantation other than liver or liver-kidney
transplant.
4. Subjects with previous liver transplantation.
5. Vulnerable population (person under temporary or permanent guardianship or
deprived of liberty by a judicial decision).
6. Pregnant and/or breastfeeding woman
7. Patients with relevant comorbidities that could impact the prognosis:
o Subjects with very severe hepatopulmonary syndrome (with PaO2 < 50
mmHg on FiO2 21%) or moderate to severe portopulmonary
hypertension (non-reversible mPAP >= 35 mmHg or PVR >= 500
dyn.s.cm-5).
o Subjects with severe (grade IV) pulmonary disease (Global Obstructive
Lung Disease [GOLD]).
o Subjects with chronic kidney disease requiring hemodialysis
o Subjects with severe heart disease (NYHA class III and IV)
o Subjects with a known infection with human immunodeficiency virus
(HIV)
o Subjects with severe neurological or psychiatric disorders
8. Patients who cannot provide prior informed consent and when there is
documented evidence that the patient has no legal surrogate decision
maker and it appears unlikely that the patient will regain
consciousness or sufficient ability to provide delayed informed consent.
9. Physician and team not committed to provide intensive care if needed.
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT04613921 |
CCMO | NL77933.078.21 |