No registrations found.
ID
Source
Brief title
Health condition
Pancreatic pseudocysts.
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Technical success rate (cyst resolution).
Secondary outcome
1. Clinical success rate (symptom relief);
2. Complication rate;
3. Recurrence rate.
Background summary
N/A
Study objective
To compare Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided pseudocyst drainage to conventional non-EUS guided endoscopic drainage.
Study design
N/A
Intervention
1. Endoscopic pseudocyst drainage under direct EUS vision executed by a therapeutic radial echoendoscope;
2. Conventional endoscopic pseudocyst drainage using a therapeutic duodenoscope preceded by a diagnostic EUS procedure.
P.O. Box 22660
Djuna Cahen
Meibergdreef 9
Amsterdam 1100 DD
The Netherlands
+31 (0)20 3474723
Djunacahen@hotmail.com
P.O. Box 22660
Djuna Cahen
Meibergdreef 9
Amsterdam 1100 DD
The Netherlands
+31 (0)20 3474723
Djunacahen@hotmail.com
Inclusion criteria
1. Pseudocyst > 5 cm in size;
2. Presence > 6 weeks.
Exclusion criteria
1. Pregnancy;
2. ASA klass III/IV;
3. Haemorrhagic diathesis;
4. Decompensated liver cirrhosis;
5. Dilated pancreatic duct > 5 mm;
6. Suspected malignancy;
7. Distance between cyst - gut lumen > 1 cm;
8. Multiple septae (indication for surgery).
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
| Register | ID |
|---|---|
| NTR-new | NL484 |
| NTR-old | NTR527 |
| Other | : N/A |
| ISRCTN | Incomplete data for ISRCTN |