No registrations found.
ID
Source
Brief title
Health condition
Patients with a donorsite after harvesting a split thickness skin graft usually experience pain, discomfort and sometimes develop infection.
Keywords: donorsite; split thickness skin graft; pain; infection; discomfort.
Sponsors and support
Plesmanlaan 121
1066 CX Amsterdam
Plesmanlaan 121
1066 CX Amsterdam
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Re-epithelialization
Secondary outcome
Patient comfort
Infection
Number of dressing changes
Study objective
H0: all three regimens are comparable in terms of patient comfort and re-epithelialization.
H1: hydrocolloid is superior to silicon foam or alginate and semipermeable film in terms of patient comfort and re-epithelialization.
Study design
Day 1, 5, 9, 14, 21, 90 postoperative.
Intervention
Group 1: silicon foam dressing (Mepilex)
Group 2: hydrocolloid dressing (XtraSorb HCS)
Group 3: or alginate (Kaltostat) and semipermeable film (Tegaderm)
Stephanie de Jong
Amsterdam 1066 CX
The Netherlands
020-5129059 (06-50439906)
sj.d.jong@nki.nl
Stephanie de Jong
Amsterdam 1066 CX
The Netherlands
020-5129059 (06-50439906)
sj.d.jong@nki.nl
Inclusion criteria
All patients older than 18 years after split thickness skin graft and signed informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
< 18 years.
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
| Register | ID |
|---|---|
| NTR-new | NL5332 |
| NTR-old | NTR5441 |
| Other | : |