The main goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of Actigait on walking skills in stroke patients with a drop foot.
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Central nervous system vascular disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
- obstacle avoidance success rates (in terms of failures to avoid obstacles)
- net energy cost of walking at comfortable speed
Secondary outcome
- step length, step width, step frequency, cadence
- duration of stance, swing, and double support phase
- range of motion of ankle, knee, and hip during walking
- EMG onset latency and amplitude in response to the obstacle
- spatial avoidance characteristics (horizontal and vertical toe clearance)
- ankle and knee moments and power during the stance phase of walking
- activity level (pedometer and questionnaire)
- comfortable walking speed (level walking normal surface)
- outdoor walking speed
- personal use (questionnaire)
Background summary
In the Netherlands, every year 30.000 people sustain a cerebrovasular accident
(CVA or stroke). Although a large proportion of these people (approximately
60%) experience partly recovery, irreversible physical impairments remain. An
estimated 20% of strokes result in a drop foot, which is caused by the
inability to (efficiently) activate the muscles that dorsiflex the ankle joint.
While walking, patients with a drop foot tend to drag the foot during the swing
phase (lack of toe clearance), which places them at risk for tripping.
Furthermore, a drop foot usually is part of a general stereotyped walking
pattern of the affected leg, characterized by insufficient knee and hip flexion
during swing. This lack of flexion predominantly causes stroke patients to
experience difficulties when stepping over obstacles, due to insufficient foot
clearance.
Recently, a new (implanted) FES system has been developed for stroke patients
with a drop foot. This system is expected to improve walking ability, not only
on regular, but even more on irregular terrain. On irregular terrain, the
locomotor pattern has to be continuously adjusted in order not to stumble or
fall. These complex gait skills are essential for independent and safe mobility
in daily life and highly associated with fall incidence. Especially in this
domain of complex gait skills, Actigait® is expected to be superior to a
conventional AFO or orthopedic shoes. Also walking efficiency, in terms of
energy cost, is expected to benefit from the Actigait® system.
Study objective
The main goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of Actigait on
walking skills in stroke patients with a drop foot.
Study design
Step 1: Patients will be informed about this study by their physiatrists and
eligible patients will be invited to participate. A 90-minute intake visit will
be planned with the physiatrists of the department of rehabilitation in
Nijmegen or Amsterdam. One week after the intake visit, an external FES system
will be provided and adjusted to the patient. In addition, a baseline gait
assessment will be scheduled at the mobility labs in Nijmegen and Amsterdam.
During this visit, the quality of gait will be assessed when walking (if
applicable, with AFO). After 4 weeks, the functional response to the external
stimulation will be evaluated. When a good response to the external FES device
is present, the patient will be admitted to step 2 of the study.
Step 2: The Actigait system will be implanted in a 45-minutes neurosurgical
procedure. Ten days after surgery, the system will be set up and the patient
can start its use. Repeated gait assessments will be conducted at 3 (Nijmegen
only), 9, and 26 weeks, both with and without stimulation. In week 2, 3, 4, 6,
9 en 26 of step 2, a telephone interview will be held to evaluate the extent of
usage and the activities performed with Actigait. Activity level will be
monitored in week 1 of step 1 and in week 8 en 25 of step 2 by means of a
pedometer.
Intervention
Implantation and usage of an FES system to correct drop foot
Study burden and risks
The common risks associated to (minor) surgical procedures to the extremities,
like wound infections, apply to this study. The use of a cuff-electrode around
the n. peroneus communis could theoretically lead to nerve damage when the
electrode used is too small. In a prior study on the safety of the Actigait
system by Burridge et al. (2007) no such events occurred. Furthermore, no
additional device-related adverse events occurred during a 15-months follow-up
period.
Postbus 9101
6500 HB Nijmegen
Nederland
Postbus 9101
6500 HB Nijmegen
Nederland
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
- chronic stroke (> 6 months post-stroke)
- drop foot
- insufficient therapeutic effects of conventional treatment methods, such as an AFO, orthopedic footwear, or discomfort with the use of these orthotic devices
- passive range of ankle motion > 30 degrees with at least 0 degrees of dorsiflexion with extended knee on physical examination
- ankle spasticity 0-3 as assessed by the Modified Ashworth Scale
- independent walking ability without walking aid for > 10 minutes
- age 18-60 years
- able to visit the academic hospitals in both Nijmegen and Amsterdam on multiple occasions during a nine-months period
- positive response to an external peroneal stimulation
Exclusion criteria
- Severe cognitive deficit
- Pregnancy
- Depressive or psychotic disorder
- Pace-maker
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL17811.091.07 |