Goal of this study is to assess the feasibility of a biodegradable polyurethane foam for closing of oroantral communications. The assessment will take place in a small number of patients. On the long term, the objective is the clinical appliance of…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Head and neck therapeutic procedures
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The primary endpoint is the technical success, defined as the successful
application of the polyurethane foam, without reoccurence of a perforation
secondary to loss of the foam, inflammation or inadequate fitting. The oral
mucosal overgrowth will be examined to evaluate these endpoints.
Safety parameters: the safety outcome of the study will be described in terms
of the incidence of procedure or device related adverse events occuring up to
and including 8 weeks after application in the oroantral perforation.
Secondary outcome
patient friendliness and device appreciation (physician)
Background summary
An oroantral communication (OAC) is a communication between the oral and nasal
cavity. In general, an OAC is caused by extraction of maxillary (pre)molars.
Although the incidence is relatively low (5 %), OACs are frequently encountered
due to the high number of extractions.
To prevent chronic sinusitis and the developmentment of fistulas, it is
generally accepted that all OACs should be closed within 24 to 48 hours.
Surgical closure with a mucoperiosteal flap is the treatment of choice
nowadays. The patient has to be referref to a maxillofacial surgeon for this
surgical treatment because, in general, the dentist does not have the expertise
and the required facilities to treat the OAC himself.
Another major objective of the surgical treatment for edentulous patients is
the fact that the buccal sulcus height almost certainly decreases permanently,
thereby hindering the construction of a well-fitted dental prosthesis.
The proposed treatment with a biodegradable polyurethane foam meets this
objections because it is a quick, safe and simple strategy and does not require
additional surgical expertise. This will make it possible for a dentist to
treat an OAC himself instead of having to refer the patient to a specialist.
Furthermore, the proposed strategy has no influence on the buccal sulcus
height.
In addition, it is expected that, compared with the conventional surgical
treatment, the proposed strategy will result in less postoperative pain and
swelling. Lastly, due to the biodegradability of the polyurethane foam, a
second visit for removal of the foam is not necessary.
Study objective
Goal of this study is to assess the feasibility of a biodegradable polyurethane
foam for closing of oroantral communications. The assessment will take place in
a small number of patients. On the long term, the objective is the clinical
appliance of the polyurethane foam on a large scale.
Study design
This single center study represents the pilot phase of the study design. During
the pilot phase, the feasibility of the proposed treatment will be assessed in
10 patients. During the pilot phase every patient with an OAC at the department
of oral and maxillofacial surgery of the UMCG will be examined and included in
the study when the inclusion criteria are met. Secondly, all selected patients
with an OAC will be treated with the polyurethane foam until a total number of
10 patients is reached. A prospective multi center trial will be set up when
the pilot phase has been finished
Intervention
All patients (n = 10) will be treated in the same manner. The size of the
oroantral communication will be examined and a polyurethane foam is selected
that matches its size. Secondly, the foam is fitted in the perforation and
loosely secured on the oral side with one 3.0 or 4.0 vicryl suture to ensure
that the foam stays in place.
Study burden and risks
To our point of view the proposed strategy implies both a minimal risk and
burden for the patients. Firstly, it is expected that the proposed treatment is
quicker than the conventional surgical treatment. Secondly, the swelling and
postoperative pain will most likely be less prominent after the proposed
treatment. Furthermore, the most important risk associated with participation
is possible reoccurence of an OAC, for example due to loss of the foam.
However, in case an OAC reoccurs, the attending physician can fall back on the
conventional surgical strategy in any case. Lastly, the number of policlinical
visits associated with participation in this study has been restricted to a
total of three, which is only slightly more than general (2 visits).
Hanzeplein 1
Postbus 30 001, 9700 RB Groningen
Nederland
Hanzeplein 1
Postbus 30 001, 9700 RB Groningen
Nederland
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
fresh oroantral communication (existing less then 48 hours)
Exclusion criteria
oroantral communication existing for more then 48 hours
patients who require endocarditisprophylaxis or antobiotic prophylaxis for other indications
a history of acute or chronic sinusitis
immune compromised patients
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL18648.042.07 |