Aim of this study is measuring the effects of locoregional anaesthesia in EDS patients and comparing these effects with those in a healthy control group. The results of this study can be used to make a more valid choice for the type of anaesthesia…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders congenital
- Connective tissue disorders (excl congenital)
- Epidermal and dermal conditions
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Analgesia in the region of the ulnar nerve within 60 minutes after application
of an ulnar nerve block. This will be demonstrated by stimuli from a
neurostimulator above 20 mA which will not be regarded as painful in case of an
adequate block.
Secondary outcome
Analgesia from the subcutanous injections and the topical application of EMLA
cream
Time of onset of analgesia
Time of end of analgesia
Duration of analgesia
Background summary
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome is a group of rare genetic disorders caused by a defect
in collagen synthesis. Several patients from the Dutch Ehlers-Danlos patient
organisation claimed that for them regional and local anaesthesia techniques
did not work as good as would be expected. However, up to now there is no proof
or explanation for this phenomenon. Hence this research project has started on
request of the Ehlers Danlos patient organisation.
Ehlers-Danlos patients are to be expected to need frequent operations. The
benefits and risks of regional in comparison with general anesthesia might be
different in this group than in healthy people. With the results of this study
it might become possible to make a more valid choice for the type of
anaesthesia for the Ehlers-Danlos patients in the future.
Study objective
Aim of this study is measuring the effects of locoregional anaesthesia in EDS
patients and comparing these effects with those in a healthy control group. The
results of this study can be used to make a more valid choice for the type of
anaesthesia for the Ehlers-Danlos patients in the future.
Study design
This study concerns a prospective case-control study of the effects of
locoregional anaestesia on Ehlers-Danlos patients versus a healthy control
group
Intervention
1) An ulnar nerve block on the non dominant arm with 3 ml lidocaine 2%
2) EMLA-cream, 1.5 gram applicated on the dorsal side of the contralateral
hand, covered with foil
3) three times a field block of 3 by 3 cm by means of three subcutanous
injections on the dorsal side of the thorax. One will be five ml lidocaine 1%,
one lidocaine 2% en one NaCl 0.9%.
Study burden and risks
Burden:
Completing a questionnaire at home, amplified with a physical examination in
hospital on the day of the measurements to evaluate the risks of regional
anaesthesia for the subject.
Application of EMLA-cream on the back of the hand, followed by an ulnar nerve
block, performed as in clinical practice.
Finally three subcutanous injections on the on the dorsal side of the thorax
are administered.
Risks
1) In high dose local anaesthetics can give intoxication. The administered dose
of lidocain in this study is far below this toxic dose (pg 14 protocol). If
nevertheless symptoms of intoxication do occur, all equipment, medication,
nurses and staff are present to treat this immediately. For this reason all
injections will take place in the OR, after which monitoring will be continued
in the recovery room
2) Every injection can cause a haematoma.
3) The onset and duration of the analgesic effects are averages from
literature. Analgesia can be longer than expected but will always be temporary.
4) There is a theoretical risk of ulnar neuropathy after an ulnar block. In
literature there is no case report of ulnar neuropathy after an ulnar block
with lidocaine; the occurrence is extremely unlikely.
Heidelberglaan 100
3584 CX Utrecht
NL
Heidelberglaan 100
3584 CX Utrecht
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
For EDS patients
- People with all types of the Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome except type IV (the vascular type), proven by a geneticist or a comparably qualified person
- 18 to 65 years old
- Infomed consent;For the control group
- All subjects are matched with a patient from the EDS group for age and sex
Exclusion criteria
For EDS patients
- EDS type IV (vascular type)
- No informed consent
- Younger than 18 or older than 65 years old
- Co-existing disease which increases the risk for regional anesthesia, this according to prudent daily clinical practice in the OR
- Hereditary or acquired (including drug induced) bleeding disorders
- Periferal mononeuropathy, polyneuropathy, Multiple Sclerosis or other relevant neurologic disorders;Control group
- EDS or direct family with EDS because of the possibility of undiagnosed EDS in the subject
- No informed consent
- Younger than 18 or older than 65 years old
- Co-existing disease which increases the risk for regional anesthesia, this according to prudent daily clinical practice in the OR
- Hereditary or acquired (including drug induced) bleeding disorders
- Periferal mononeuropathy, polyneuropathy, Multiple Sclerosis or other relevant neurologic disorders
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
EudraCT | EUCTR2006-004656-20-NL |
CCMO | NL13893.041.07 |
Other | volgt |
OMON | NL-OMON22447 |