Safety and performance will be based on a comparison of overall success rates of the Barricaid ARDand either a concurrent group (nonrandomized) of control patients treated by conventional surgicalmethods (e.g., noninstrumented discectomy) at select…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Nervous system, skull and spine therapeutic procedures
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
NVT
Secondary outcome
NVT
Background summary
Lumbar discectomy has become the most common spinal procedure in the US, with
nearly 300,000procedures performed each year because of the epidemic problem of
low-back pain, which leads to15 million physician visits per year and has
created a tremendous financial burden on societyexceeding $50 billion
annually.1,2,3,4 Low-back pain causes nearly 80% of injured workers to miss
atleast 8 weeks of work following a back injury.5 In persons younger than 45
years old, low-back pain isthe most frequent cause of activity limitation.6
Although only 4% of patients with low-back pain havean acute disc
herniation4,7, a disproportionate 30% of US annual costs for the treatment of
low-backpain are spent on this relatively small percentage of patients.8The
incidence of lumbar disc herniation peaks in patients between 24 and 45 years
of age with theincidence leading to surgery occurring most often in patients in
the 30- to 39-year-old range. 9 A malepredominance in the incidence of lumbar
disc surgery ranges from 1.3:1 to 2:1 because discs in menundergo higher
mechanical stress as well as inadequate nutrition due to longer nutrient
diffusionpathways.10,11 Other risk factors for herniated lumbar discs include
smoking, presence of narrowerlumbar vertebral canal, sedentary occupations,
prolonged motor vehicle driving, and operatingvibrating machinery.12,13 Most
surgeons initially manage patients with low-back pain and radicularsymptoms
with a trial of analgesic medications and physical therapy for several weeks
before
Study objective
Safety and performance will be based on a comparison of overall success rates
of the Barricaid ARDand either a concurrent group (nonrandomized) of control
patients treated by conventional surgicalmethods (e.g., noninstrumented
discectomy) at select European sites or the published clinicalliterature on the
same patient population. Overall clinical success is based on a 15% improvement
inOswestry and a two point (2 point on a 10 point scale) improvement in VAS Leg
(combined) scores.Overall radiographic success requires maintenance of average
disc height (75% or greater ofpreoperative disc height). Safety will be judged
clinically using standard neurological assessmentsand clinically symptomatic
reherniation. A successful patient will not experience a loss ofneurological
function (at the index level) nor experiences reherniation at the original
defect site. Allreoperations that involve the removal/ repositioning of the
Barricaid ARD or the addition ofsupplemental hardware at the index level will
cause the patient to be classified as a failure. Inaddition, safety will be
documented based on the type and rate of occurrence of adverse eventsoccurring
during the study. The Barricaid ARD will be determined to be safe and
performing asintended if the Barricaid ARD rates of overall success are
equivalent or better than the controlpopulation.
Study design
This clinical trial is a prospective, multicentre, historical controled study
to evaluate the safety and performance of the Barricaid ARD by treatment of
lumbal disc herniation
Intervention
NVT
Study burden and risks
The risks of the BARRICAID* surgery combined with the conventional treatment
are: a) infection of wounddrainage; b)return of the herniation; c)effects on
the central nerve system;d) same symptoms as before the surgery; e) migration
of the device in of out the lumbal disc;f)death as complication of the surgery
or anesthesia
Weg door Jonkerbos 100
6532 SZ Nijmegen
NL
Weg door Jonkerbos 100
6532 SZ Nijmegen
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Any subject meeting all of the following criteria will be considered acceptable for inclusion in this trial.1. Age 18 to 75 years old (male or female).2. Patients with posterior or posterolateral disc herniations at one or two levels between L1 andS1 with radiographic confirmation of neural compression using CT and/or MRI.3. At least six (6) weeks of failed, conservative treatment prior to surgery, including physicaltherapy, use of anti-inflammatory medications at maximum specified dosage and/oradministration of epidural/facet injections.;4. Minimum posterior disc height of 3mm at the index level(s).5. Lower back pain and/or sciatica with or without spinal claudication.6. Oswestry Questionnaire score of at least 40/100 at baseline.7. VAS leg pain of at least 40/100 at baseline.8. Psychosocially, mentally and physically able to fully comply with the clinical protocol and willingto adhere to follow-up schedule and requirements.
Exclusion criteria
3.1.2 EXCLUSION CRITERIAAny subject meeting any one of the following criteria will be excluded from enrollment into the trial:1. Spondylolisthesis Grade II or higher2. Subject requires uni or bilateral facetectomy to treat leg/back pain3. Subject has back or non-radicular leg pain of unknown etiology.4. Prior fusion (with or without instrumentation), motion preservation, facetectomy or IDETsurgery at the index lumbar vertebral level5. Subject*s requiring a spine DEXA (i.e., patients with SCORE of = 6) with a T Score lessthan -2.0 at the index level.6. Subject has clinically compromised vertebral bodies at the index level(s) due to any traumatic,neoplastic, metabolic, or infectious pathology.7. Subject has sustained pathologic fractures of the vertebra or multiple fractures of the vertebraor hip.8. Subject has scoliosis of greater than ten (10) degrees (both angular and rotational).9. Any metabolic disease bone disease that has not been stabilized for at least three months
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL23971.091.08 |