This project aims at investigating the crossmodal interactions and crossmodal transfer during the perception of different newly learned motor patterns using fMRI. Before scanning, participants will learn to perform key sequences on a piano keyboard…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Other condition
Synonym
Health condition
n.v.t.
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Main study parameter will be the hemodynamic response measured with fMRI. More
specifically, the repetition suppression effect, which is due to repeated
presentation of stimuli will be analyzed. This effect will be compared for the
different experimental conditions (please see study design). The visual mirror
system will be determined by identifying the areas that show a repetition
effect in the experimental condition (1) Vtrain Vtest. The auditory mirror
system will be determined by identifying the areas that show a repetition
effect in the experimental condition (4) Atrain Atest. For the comparison of
the experimental conditions 1, 2 and 3, we hypothesize that within the areas of
the visual mirror system the repetition suppression effect will be largest for
(1) Vtrain Vtest, diminished in (2) Atrain Vtest and smallest for (3) no-train
Vtest. Analogously we expect that within the areas of the auditory mirror sytem
the repetition suppression effect will be largest for (4) Atrain Atest,
diminished in (5) Vtrain Atest and smallest for (6) no-train Atest.
In the third fMRI scan, we test whether there are trimodal brain areas by
examining the crossmodal repetition effect. This will be done by identifying
areas that show a repetition suppression effect when sequences will be
presented successively auditorily and visually. We expect that overlapping
areas of the auditory and the visual mirror system show a crossmodal repetition
suppression effect.
Secondary outcome
Furthermore, we analyze properties of the integrity of white matter tracts
reflected by the fractional anisotropy (FA) for the directional dependence of
water diffusion. These values will be correlated with learning parameter (e.g.,
learning time for the key sequences) as well as with the individual hemodynamic
responses in brain areas which show a repetition suppression effect.
Background summary
The mirror-neuron system is assumed to be the neural basis for a direct
matching between observation and motor representations of actions and is
considered to mediate the understanding of actions and intentions (see [1]).
There seems to be a similar system for the auditory domain that matches a heard
action to the according motor representation (see e.g., [2]). However, the
crossmodal interactions within the system have not yet been investigated
systematically.
[1] Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual
Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169-192.
[2] Gazzola, V., Aziz-Zadeh, L., & Keysers, C. (2006). Empathy and the
somatotopic auditory mirror system in humans. Current Biology, 16, 1824-1829.
Study objective
This project aims at investigating the crossmodal interactions and crossmodal
transfer during the perception of different newly learned motor patterns using
fMRI. Before scanning, participants will learn to perform key sequences on a
piano keyboard either within a purely auditory learning condition or within a
purely visual learning condition.
Firstly, it will be examined whether the auditory and the visual mirror system
share common neural substrates.
Secondly, we test which brain areas and which parts of the mirror system
respond to the sound of an action (i.e., a melody), if this action was learned
by observation of according finger movements. Correspondingly, it will be
tested, which brain areas and especially which parts of the mirror system are
activated during the observation of an action (finger movements on a piano
keyboard) which was learned to perform by listening to the corresponding
melody. In other words, we investigate whether there is a crossmodal transfer
if one action was learned within one modality. Thirdly, we examine whether
there are trimodal areas, which respond to the sound as well as to the
observation of an action. Furthermore, structural as well as functional data
will be related to behavioural data: Differences in white matter pathways in
each single participant will be examined using diffusion tensor imaging, in
order to correlate the obtained values to differential performance parameters
during the motor training and individual hemodynamic responses in relevant
brain areas during a (motor) perception task.
Study design
There are two different learning conditions:
1. observing finger movements showing a key sequence, while participants see
their own fingers during reproduction, but can*t hear a sound (learning by
vision only) or
2. listening to a key sequence (i.e., a melody), without seeing their own
finger movements during training, but hearing the result of own key presses
(learning by listening only).
After completing each of one training session, participants will take part in
scanning sessions including functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and
diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) after three days training and fMRI and an
anatomical MRI scan after 6 days training.
Within the fMRI scan they will hear (within one trial two, either same or
different) melodies, which they have learned to perform during the auditory or
the visual training or which they haven*t learned to perform. Accordingly,
participants will observe different finger movements which they have learned to
perform during the auditory or the visual training or which they haven*t
learned to perform.
This results in 6 different experimental conditions (for the first fMRI scan,
after visual or the auditory training only, there are 4 conditions,
respectively):
1. Vtrain Vtest: observing sequences that were previously trained to perform
visually
2. Atrain Vtest: observing sequences that were previously trained to perform
auditorily
3. no-train Vtest: observing sequences that were not trained to perform
4. Atrain Atest: hearing sequences that were previously trained auditorily
5. Vtrain Atest: hearing sequences that were previously trained visually
6. no-train Atest: hearing sequences that were not trained to perform
After that, participants receive a further training session during which they
are trained to perform all melodies presented auditorily and visually
simultaneously. During a third fMRI scan, within each trial, two (either same
or different) of the trained key sequences will be presented either both
visually, both auditorily or one visually and one auditorily.
Study burden and risks
Participants will be exposed to a 3 T magnetic field. No side effects have been
described so far. On rare occasions a peripheral nerve (abdomen) is stimulated
by the changing magnetic gradients. This will cause an itchy feeling, but is
not harmful.
Ant. Deusinglaan 2
9713 AW
NL
Ant. Deusinglaan 2
9713 AW
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
between 18 - 40 years of age
male and female
normal vision and hearing
right handed
people without musical training
Exclusion criteria
1. Individuals learned to play a musical instrument, or had singing lessons
2. left handedness
3. MR incompatible implants in the body
4. Neurological complaints present as well as past
5. Use of drugs that may influence the task performance
6. Claustrophobia
7. Wishes not to be informed of brain abnormalities that may be noticed in the scans
8. (Suspected) Pregnancy
9. Red tattoos
The fMRI exclusioncriteria will be checked by way of a questionnaire.
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL29720.042.09 |