1 Confirm comparable results in reduction and consolidation of the fracture fragments using the LFN vs the UFN2 Identifying a significant difference in the soft tissue damage between the LFN and the UFN
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Procedural related injuries and complications NEC
- Fractures
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Damage to the superior gluteal nerve (measured by EMG)
Abduction force (measured by Biodex)
Functional combined score (Oxford hip score, Oxford knee score and the
Fulkeson-Shea score)
Secondary outcome
Deformities of the fracture
Consolidation of the fracture
VAS pain score
Range of motion
Background summary
The LFN (lateral femoral nail) is a new, helical shaped implant used for the
treatment of femoral shaft fractures. The point of entry of the LFN is located
lateral to the tip of the greater trochanter. In comparison to the conventional
reamed/unreamed straight femoral nail, that has its entry point in the
piriformic fossa, the entry point of the LFN can be more easily located and it
is expected this new implant will lead to less soft tissue damage.
Study objective
1 Confirm comparable results in reduction and consolidation of the fracture
fragments using the LFN vs the UFN
2 Identifying a significant difference in the soft tissue damage between the
LFN and the UFN
Study design
Prospective randomised controlled trial
Inclusion of patients will be performed at the moment there is an indication
for an intramedullary femoral nail.
Patients will be randomised into two groups.
50 patients will undergo surgery receiving the LFN, 50 patients will be treated
with the UFN.
There will be a follow-up period of 1 year with visits at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6
months and 1 year. These visits will all fall within the standard follow-up
after this kind of fracture.
Extra investigations necessary for this research:
-Clinical CT scan for measuring rotational deformities
-Abduction force measurements performed by the fysiotherapist using Biodex (4
times)
-Needle EMG after 6 weeks measuring function of the superior gluteal nerve. The
EMG will be repeated after 1 year if the first measurement is abnormal
-Filling out a questionnaire during the outclinic visits at 6 weeks, 3 months,
6 months and 1 year
Intervention
Implantation of the LFN (lateral femoral nail)
Study burden and risks
The EMG is the main extra burden for the patients because it is an
uncomfortable investigation performed with a needle. However this investigation
is essential for this research to be able come to an signifcant conclusion.
The risk associated with participation is only small. The helical shape of the
new implant could cause rotational deformity of the fracture and iatrogenic
fractures. At this moment a prospective multicentre case-series study is being
performed on the LFN. 182 patients are included so far with untill now 6
iatrogenic fractuers and 2 malrotations (www.aofoundation.org)
Hilvarenbeekseweg 60
5022GC Tilburg
NL
Hilvarenbeekseweg 60
5022GC Tilburg
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Femoral shaft fracture (AO type 32) with the indication for an intramedullary nail
Exclusion criteria
life expectancy <1 year
Soft tissue damage to such extent that comparison between the groups will be impossible
Limping before the fracture caused by preexistent damage
Bilateral fracture
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL24529.008.08 |