Primary Objective:Determination of the best surgical approach in the individual patient to achieve optimal outcome statistics (catheter survival, 30-day or in-hospital mortality and long-term mortality) Secondary Objective:Comparison of short and…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Other condition
- Nephropathies
- Vascular therapeutic procedures
Synonym
Health condition
Nierfunctiestoornis waarvoor CAPD
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
1) Catheter survival: Number of patients with proper functioning catheter
o After three months
o After six months
o After 1 year
2) 30-day or in-hospital mortality and long-term mortality
Secondary outcome
1) Number of short and long-term post-operative complications
Short term complications:
Bowel perforation, bleeding, wound infection, early peritonitis,
malposition, outflow failure, dialysate leakage
Long term complications:
Exit site infection, tunnel infection, cuff protrusion, malposition,
outflow failure, dialysate leakage, hernias,
peritonitis
2) Patency of CAPD catheter
* Primary patency (without interventions)
* Primary assisted patency (with use of antibiotics)
* Secondary patency (need for additional intervention)
Background summary
The patient population with end-stage renal disease dependent on dialysis is
increasing. This renal replacement therapy can take place in two different
ways: haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Boths options have their patient
population in which a certain technique is more suitable. The present study
focusses on patients who will become dependent on peritoneal dialysis. To
facilitate this technique, a catheter has to be placed in the peritoneal cavity
in order to administer the dialsysate which has to be changed severel times a
day. A well-functioning catheter is of the utmost importance for the success of
this therapy. Several catheter complications, both infectious and
non-infectious, hamper the CAPD treatment. The infectious complications can be
subdivided into peritonitis, exit site infections and tunnel infections whereas
non-infectious complications can be subdivided into abdominal hernia, dialysis
leakage, obstruction of the catheter, adhesions in the peritoneal cavity and
catheter tip migration.
Clinical practivce reveals two different techniques by which the abdominal
catheter can be placed; the open procedure and the laparoscopic procedure.
Untill now, there is no agreement which technique results in more complications
and interventions and thus which technique has the potency to result in the
most optimal catheter functioning.
Study objective
Primary Objective:
Determination of the best surgical approach in the individual patient to
achieve optimal outcome statistics (catheter survival, 30-day or in-hospital
mortality and long-term mortality)
Secondary Objective:
Comparison of short and long-term complications in patients who receive a
catheter for peritoneal dialysis by either open surgery or laparoscopic
surgery.
Study design
Multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial
Patients will be asked to participate in this study after screening for in- and
exclusion criteria by the surgeon. After the informed consent procedure
patients of both centers will be randomized by computer in either the
laparoscopic or the open surgical arm. During follow-up of the patient,
infectious and non-infectious complications will be monitored and overall
usability of the catheter will be evaluated.
Intervention
Placement of a CAPD catheter either by an open or laparoscopic surgical
procedure. Both treatment options are part of regular patient care. Description
of the surgical procedure is available on page 9,10 and 11 in the study
protocol.
Study burden and risks
The burden on the patient doesn't change compared to current clinical practice.
The indication for the intervention will be set during a visit to the
pre-dialysis clinic by independant physisians. After this the patient will be
referred to the surgical out-patient clinic where the informed consent
procedure takes place. The patient is informed about the surgical procedures
and after informed consent the patient is randomised by computer in either the
open or the laparoscopic arm.
The surgeon is well trained and experienced in performing both procedures. The
follow-up of the patients will take place during regular follow-up on the
dialysis ward and thus extra visits to the clinic will not be necessairy.
P. Debyelaan 25
6229 HX Maastricht
NL
P. Debyelaan 25
6229 HX Maastricht
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Age between 18-85
Randomisation by computer
Suitable for both CAPD catheter and intervention strategies
Informed consent
Exclusion criteria
Life expectancy < 1 year
Other intervention during the same surgical procedure
Loss of peritoneal function
No informed consent
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL28836.068.09 |
Other | Pending |
OMON | NL-OMON24948 |