The aim of this project is to improve dietary intake assessment using a novel technique, compare it with the existing methodology and validate it against total energy expenditure.a. Improve dietary intake assessment using a 7-day food record in…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Other condition
Synonym
Health condition
energiemetabolisme van de mens
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The main outcome is the difference in underreporting, underrecording and
undereating between the weighed food record and the food record in combination
with the camera-phone.
Secondary outcome
N/A
Background summary
Over the past decades, the prevalence of obesity has increased dramatically
{Flegal, 2002; Visscher, 2002}. Overweight or obesity is caused by an imbalance
between energy intake and energy expenditure where even the smallest imbalance
can lead to large changes in body weight over time. To study causes and
consequences of obesity and other diseases related to energy imbalance,
accurate and precise techniques are needed to assess both food intake and
physical activity, the latter being the most variable component of energy
expenditure. Whereas these parameters can be accurately assessed under
laboratory conditions, assessing food intake and physical activity in daily
life is still a methodological challenge.
By comparing reported energy intake with measured total energy expenditure
(TEE), misreporting becomes visible. The golden standard for the assessment of
TEE under daily life conditions is doubly labeled water (DLW). Validation
studies with DLW show that misreporting is mainly a matter of underreporting.
On the other hand, overreporting can also occur in some populations, e.g.
depleted patients, and might overestimate the health situation of these
patients.
Study objective
The aim of this project is to improve dietary intake assessment using a novel
technique, compare it with the existing methodology and validate it against
total energy expenditure.
a. Improve dietary intake assessment using a 7-day food record in combination
with a camera-phone and compare it with the traditional weighed record.
b. Validate this new technique against total energy expenditure as assessed
with a tri-axial accelerometer.
Study design
Subjects fill out a 7-day food record twice, once by means of a weighed food
record and once a record without weighing in combination with a camera-phone.
Hence, all measurements will be performed twice. The design will be a
randomized crossover design with 1 week between the two trials.
Underreporting will be assessed by comparing energy intake with total energy
expenditure (TEE) calculated from 7 days physical activity assessment with an
accelerometer.
Underrecording and undereating, the two components of underreporting will be
assessed by measuring water loss and body mass change respectively, a technique
also previously developed at our laboratory {Goris, 2000}.
In summary, all measurements that will be performed are:
- the assessment of body weight and height
- the assessment of physical activity
- the assessment of water loss over a week interval
- the assessment of energy intake with a 7-day food diary (1 week a weighed
food record, 1 week a food record in combination with a camera-phone)
Study burden and risks
The burden associated with participation is low. No risks are to be expected.
PB616
6200MD Maastricht
Nederland
PB616
6200MD Maastricht
Nederland
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Healthy adults, aged between 18 and 65 y.
Exclusion criteria
Non-Dutch speaking.
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL29281.068.09 |