Our main objective is to compare the effects of weak and strong food temptations on the activation of reward and conflict areas in the brain.
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Other condition
Synonym
Health condition
regulier eetgedrag
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Neural activation (percentage signal change) induced by the presentation of
pictures of food temptations.
Secondary outcome
Reaction times on a lexical decision task, scores on dieting success
questionnaire, snack choice.
Background summary
In terms of self-regulation, people respond differently to weak and strong food
temptations. Strong temptations have been found to trigger defensive
self-regulation processes, assisting successful resistance of temptation. On
the contrary and quite paradoxically, weak temptations do not trigger
self-regulation and are therefore more easily indulged. Presumably, the
negative consequences of weak temptations with respect to the weight watching
goal are underestimated, thereby failing to trigger the *alarm system*. It is
yet unclear, however, at what level of cognitive processing a difference
appears between weak and strong temptations. Research on the brain regions
triggered by exposure to weak and strong food temptations can provide insights
into the mechanisms underlying temptation resistance vs. indulgence.
Study objective
Our main objective is to compare the effects of weak and strong food
temptations on the activation of reward and conflict areas in the brain.
Study design
A randomized intervention study with two conditions: weak temptations vs.
strong temptations.
Study burden and risks
The study is non-therapeutic to participants, poses a minimal burden, and
involves no significant risks. Knowledge about brain activation in response to
food temptations is essential for our understanding of indulgence or resistance
of temptations. Young females compose a particularly suitable population for
this study, as they are known to be concerned about their weight (e.g., Wardle,
Haase, & Steptoe, 2006) and often adopting healthy eating as a subgoal to
achieve weight loss or maintenance (e.g., Serdula et al., 1999).
Heidelberglaan 1
3584 CS Utrecht
Nederland
Heidelberglaan 1
3584 CS Utrecht
Nederland
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
- female
- age between 18 and 30
- healthy
- normal weights (BMI between 18,5 and 25)
Exclusion criteria
- having an eating disorder
- use of medication
- having followed a strict diet in the past 6 months
- regular MRI exclusion criteria (claustrophobia, being pregnant, having metal implants)
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL30407.041.09 |