Within this project we want to establish whether there (1) are differences in brain responses to the McGurk effect between aphasic and non-brain damaged control subjects(2) is a difference between the behavioural performance of the aphasic subjects…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Other condition
Synonym
Health condition
afasie na CVA
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The measured ERP will be analyzed with regard of the occurrence/amplitude of
the Mismatch Negativity in the different conditions.
Secondary outcome
none
Background summary
The process of speech perception consists of different steps (Ellis & Young,
1988): auditory analysis, lexical processing and semantic processing, which can
be disturbed independently from each other. The auditory analysis is influenced
by lip-reading information. This can be in a helpful way (in noise or with
aphasia) as well as in a misleading way (the McGurk effect, in which the
lipmovement is different from the heard sound, leading to the perception of a
different sound). Influences of both, facilitating and misleading lip-reading,
were shown in a group of aphasic subjects in our previous behavioral research
(METc-Nr. 08.062; Hessler, Jonkers & Bastiaanse, 2009), indicating that
audiovisual integration takes place. It is however yet unclear how this
integration is accomplished in the brain. This will be subject to investigation
in the proposed study.
In order to answer this question event-related-potentials (ERPs) will be
recorded while measuring EEGs. The component aimed at (Mismatch Negativity -
MMN) has been found for this kind of experiment with healthy subjects before
and also in a different context with aphasic subjects.
Study objective
Within this project we want to establish whether there
(1) are differences in brain responses to the McGurk effect between aphasic and
non-brain damaged control subjects
(2) is a difference between the behavioural performance of the aphasic subjects
and their brain responses
(3) the brain integrates lip-reading information even if the subject does not
do so consciously.
The general aims are therefore to refine theories about speech processing and
to provide a better basis for the development of diagnostic tools and treatment
programs.
Study design
*Event-related Potentials*(ERPs) will be measured during the processing of
audio-visual, auditory or visual stimuli. A sequence of stimuli (short
syllables formed by a consonant and a vowel) will be presented, consisting of
*standards* (occurring 80%) and two or three different deviants (occurring
7-10% each). The task is to press a button when encountering a deviant. This
task will be carried out in 4 different conditions: Pure tones, auditory only,
visual only and audiovisual (congruent and McGurk stimuli). In the pure tone,
auditory only and visual only there will be 800 standards and 100+100 deviants.
For the audiovisual condition, where there are three deviants, those will occur
100 times each, with 1200 standards (to establish the same ratio in all
conditions). All stimuli will be 800 ms long and will be presented with a
stimulus onset asynchrony of 1500 ms.
During the task electrical brain activity will be recorded with 64-channel EEG
(integrated in a cap). Four additional electrodes will be placed around the
eyes (EOG), two behind the ears and one on the sternum. To enlarge the EEG
signal an amplifier will be used (Twente Medical Systems BV, Hengelo)
Study burden and risks
There are no risks for the participants. The load is purely cognitive and
consist of maximally 2 times 3 hours. The participants will have to come to the
Neuroimaging Center in Groningen.
Postbus 716
9700 AS Groningen
NL
Postbus 716
9700 AS Groningen
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
for patients
- CVA in the left hemisphere
- between 18 and 75 years old and able to give informed consent
- language Deficit as a result from the CVA
- at least 3 months post-onset
- normal hearing
- native speakers of Dutch (regional accent allowed)
- right-handed
- show McGurk effect in behavioral experiments;for the control group:
- healthy men and women without neurological history
- between 18 and 75 years old, matched for age, gender and region with the patient group
- normal hearing
- speakers of Dutch (regional accent allowed)
- right-handed
Exclusion criteria
for the patient group:;- Language problems prior to the CVA
- neuropsychological problems that could influence the results (e.g. attention deficits);for control group:
- neurological history
- language problems
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL29761.042.09 |