Study 1:- Determine whether loss aversion behaviour (i.e. increased sensitivity to losses compared to gains) is modulated by dopamine levels using a pharmacological challenge- Assess whether this effect is accompanied by the modulation of brain…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Impulse control disorders NEC
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
- Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) signal as measured with functional
magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)
- Behavioral performance on computerized tasks
- Psychophysiological recordings, e.g., electrodermal activity, blood pressure,
heart rate and eye tracking
Secondary outcome
- Subjective measurements ,e.g., self-report questionnaires, visual analogue
scales
- Blood plasma levels of prolactin and sulpiride
Background summary
Study 1:
People often avoid risks with losses even when they might earn a substantially
larger gain, indicating a differential sensitivity to gains and losses. This
behaviour, termed "loss aversion", has been associated with dopamine-rich areas
such as the ventral striatum, but causal evidence linking loss aversion and
dopamine is still missing. The first goal of this study is to use pharmaco-fMRI
in healthy subjects to provide such evidence. We will further test the
hypothesis that the risk-seeking behaviour typically observed in pathological
gamblers might reflect a reduced loss aversion resulting from a dysregulated
dopamine function.
Study 2:
Near-misses occur when an unsuccessful outcome is proximal to the designated
win. These near-misses have been shown to recruit reward-related brain areas
during gambling, raising the possibility that despite their nonwin status,
near-misses are able to enhance dopamine transmission in these areas. We will
test this hypothesis in healthy subjects, and further seek to understand
whether the persistent gambling behaviour observed in pathological gamblers
might result from a heightened sensitivity to the rewarding effect of
near-misses, in relation to a dysregulated dopaminergic transmission within the
reward circuit.
Study objective
Study 1:
- Determine whether loss aversion behaviour (i.e. increased sensitivity to
losses compared to gains) is modulated by dopamine levels using a
pharmacological challenge
- Assess whether this effect is accompanied by the modulation of brain activity
in the ventral striatum using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)
- Determine whether exacerbated risk-taking observed in pathological gamblers
results from reduced loss aversion driven by abnormal ventral striatal activity
- Assess whether acute dopamine receptor blockade restore loss aversion and
ventral striatal activity to normal levels in pathological gamblers
Study 2:
- Determine whether the brain responses to wins and near-misses in a reward
task are modulated by dopamine levels using a pharmacological challenge
- Assess whether this modulation is mediated by brain activity changes in the
reward system, specifically in the ventral striatum, insula and midbrain
- Determine whether acute dopamine receptor blockade normalizes midbrain
responses to near-misses in pathological gamblers
Study design
Subjects will have to lie in an fMRI scanner and perform two
decision-making/reward tasks successively. These tasks will be performed on two
occasions: once after administration of a placebo substance and once after
administration of 400mg sulpiride. A within-subject, double-blind,
placebo-controlled, cross-over design will be employed. Behavioral and fMRI
data will be analyzed for each task following a 2 drugs (sulpiride/placebo) x 2
groups (controls/pathological gamblers) factorial design.
Intervention
Each subject will receive a placebo and 400mg sulpiride on separate testing
days.
Study burden and risks
Subjects will have to lie down and stay still in an fMRI scanner while
performing two 30 min tasks involving making decisions and observing their
outcomes. These tasks will have to be performed twice: once after
administration of a placebo substance and once after administration of 400mg
sulpiride. We expect no serious adverse events following the administration of
sulpiride, since extensive previous experience has shown only rare and mild
side effects, restricted to headaches and transient drowsiness. Subjects will
further have small samples of their blood taken twice during each testing
sessions.
On the day preceding each drug session, subjects will have to adhere to some
simple restrictions with respect to medication, alcohol and drug intake. Also,
on the morning of each scanning session, subjects will also have to refrain
from smoking and stimulant containing drinks.
Kapittelweg 29
6525EN
NL
Kapittelweg 29
6525EN
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
All groups: males volunteers between 18 and 55 years of age, predominant right-handedness
Pathological gambling group: *active* pathological gamblers, as assessed by a score >= 5 on the SOGS questionnaire and the presence of 5 or more DSM-IV criteria for the diagnosis of pathological gambling
Control group: score <= 1 on SOGS questionnaire and none of DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling
Exclusion criteria
- neurological disorders
- DSM-IV axis I psychiatric disorders other than pathological gambling / nicotine dependence
- current psychiatric treatment
- heart problems
- claustrophobia
- metallic implants
(See p. 14 on the research protocol for more details)
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL36779.091.11 |