- to assess whether signal loss on phMRI (BOLD or ASL) in d-AMPH users is related to DA release and/or D2 receptor density -to assess which MRI technique (BOLD or ASL) is best in assessing cerebral DA neurotoxicity when compared to SPECT.
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Other condition
Synonym
Health condition
kinder en jeugd psychatrie
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
BOLD: % change in BOLD signal intensity from baseline (ROI)
ASL: % change in CBF from baseline (ROI CBF/100 mg tissue)
SPECT: difference in binding ratio between baseline and after d-AMPH
administration (striatal ROI binding/binding in occipital cortex)
Secondary outcome
Visual analogue rating scale (VAS)
Outcome measures of neuropsychological tests: Stroop Word Colour Test (STROOP),
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), Trail Making Test (TMT), Iowa
Gambling Task (IGT), Digit Span test, Tower of London Test, Emotional Go-NoGo
Task, Attention Network Task
Background summary
Amphetamine (AMPH) is a drug that is used to treat disorders such as narcolepsy
and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but it is also regularly
used for recreational purposes. However, animal studies have revealed that
repeatedly administration of high doses of AMPH may be neurotoxic to the
dopaminergic (DA) neurotransmitter system. For example, repeated amphetamine
treatment in nonhuman primates damages dopaminergic nerve terminals as is
evident from decreases in DA concentration, density of the dopamine transporter
(DAT) and the vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT-2) (Ricaurte, 2005).
Furthermore, amphetamine administration resulted in reductions in striatal
[18F]DOPA uptake in the striatum (Melega, 1996). In humans, there is evidence
that recreational and repeated use of combined d-AMPH and ecstasy use might be
neurotoxic to DA neurons (Reneman, 2002).
There is an apparent lack in studies on d-AMPH neurotoxicity in humans, which
might be related to the fact that most in vivo imaging modalities (such as PET
and SPECT) involve radioactive exposure and also are relatively expensive.
Recent work suggests that DA function can also be evaluated non-invasively
using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by measuring hemodynamic changes
following a d-AMPH challenge, called pharmacological MRI (phMRI).
Pharmacological-induced changes in hemodynamic responses can be assessed using
BOLD (blood oxygenation-level dependent) contrast and arterial spin labelling
(ASL). Jenkins et al. (2004) showed that MPTP-lesioned primates show a blunted
hemodynamic response to a d-AMPH challenge compared to controls. In a recent
explorative study we applied ASL-phMRI and SPECT to investigate dopaminergic
abnormalities in AMPH users. The results indicated a blunted hemodynamic
response in DAergic regions and a decrease in striatal DAT in AMPH users
compared to controls (Schouw, submitted 2012). However, no correlation was
found between the changes in the hemodynamic response and changes in DAT. Both
studies demonstrate that phMRI is a highly promising technique to assess
DAergic function, but in order to maximize its potential it is important to
investigate the underlying correlates of the changes we observe. However, it is
unclear what the neural underpinnings of this hemodynamic response are. One
possibility is that it reflects DA release from the synaptic terminal. To
investigate this possibility phMRI could be compared to other well-validated
techniques such as PET or SPECT measuring DA release.
To this end, in this study we want to assess whether phMRI and (123I-IBZM)
SPECT are both able to detect an increase in DA release as induced by AMPH
administration in 20 healthy male volunteers and 20 amphetamine users.
Ultimately, it is expected that DA phMRI will open a new horizon in the
diagnosis and treatment of individuals exposed to this drug of abuse as well as
patients suffering from neuropsychiatric disorders, such as ADHD.
Study objective
- to assess whether signal loss on phMRI (BOLD or ASL) in d-AMPH users is
related to DA release and/or D2 receptor density
-to assess which MRI technique (BOLD or ASL) is best in assessing cerebral DA
neurotoxicity when compared to SPECT.
Study design
BOLD- and ASL DA-phMRI studies will be conducted and compared to a [123I]IBZM
SPECT scan as reference (gold standard). One 123I-IBZM SPECT scan session with
a d-AMPH challenge will be conducted. In addition, the BOLD and ASL DA-phMRI
studies can be studied in one scan session following an i.v. challenge with the
dopamine releaser d-AMPH. These sessions will take place with an interval of 3
weeks. The order of the SPECT and phMRI scan will be randomized to control for
order effects.
Study burden and risks
No serious side effects are foreseen. MRI itself is a non-invasive imaging
modality. In this study, a low dose amphetamine challenge (0.3 mg/kg i.v.) will
be administered during the MRI study. Furthermore, low dose amphetamine (0.3
mg/kg) is nowadays frequently
administered in PET and SPECT studies, to study amphetamine induced dopamine
release. The pharmacy of
the AMC will provuide the d-amphetamine, conform GMP annex 13 criteria. No
serious side effects of the low
dose d-ampehtamine are foreseen. It has been shown that while some subjects
experience large increases in
happiness, restlessness and energy, other subjects experience almost no
subjective effects following 0.3
mg/kg, and that the quality and intensity of the subjective responses to low
dose amphetamine were similar
during a second exposure (Abi-Dargham 2003). The radiation exposure of the
SPECT scan is classified as
category II, and routinely conducted at the AMC also in healthy human
volunteers. Moreover, [123I]IBZM is
a registated radioligand, which is produced routinely using GMP-criteria.
Meibergdreef 9
, Amsterdam 1105 AZ
NL
Meibergdreef 9
, Amsterdam 1105 AZ
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Healty male volunteers, aged between 18 and 30 years. Use of amphetamine on at least 40 occasions in the past year in group of amphetamine users.
Exclusion criteria
Contraindications for MRI (e.g. osteosynthetic material, pacemaker, artificial cardiac valves); claustrophobia. Symptomatic cardiovascular disease, moderate-to-severe hypertension, hyperthyroidism, glaucoma, hypersensitivity or idiosyncrasy to sympathomimetic amines, agitation, and history of drug abuse, or use of psychotropic drugs that affect DA function, such as methylphenidate and cocaine (anamnestic). Finally, cardial conduction disorder (abnormal ECG) en renal disease.
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL39823.018.12 |