Primary Objective: To investigate the safety and feasibility of re-treating patients with COPD with the RePneu LVRC system.Secondary Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of re-treating patients with COPD with the RePneu LVRC system on lung…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Respiratory disorders NEC
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The safety objective of this study is to identify the potential number and type
of device-related and procedure-related adverse effects.
Secondary outcome
Lung function
- Change in RV, 6 months following treatment
- Change in RV/TLC ratio, 6 months following treatment
- Changes in FEV1 and FVC, 2 and 6 months following treatment
Quality of life
- Change in the SGRQ score, 2 and 6 months following treatment
- Change in the CCQ score, 2 and 6 months following treatment
Functional measures
- Change in the mMRC score, 2 and 6 months following treatment
- Change in the 6MWD, 2 and 6 months following treatment
Background summary
Current treatment of severe emphysema (COPD GOLD stages III-IV) generally is
limited to palliative measures that include supplemental oxygen,
bronchodilators, anti-inflammatory drugs and pulmonary rehabilitation. A small
subset of patients with emphysema might benefit by lung volume reduction
surgery, but this procedure is highly invasive and often results in high
morbidity and mortality. A minimally invasive treatment with the potential to
improve pulmonary function and reduce dyspnea in patients with both
heterogeneous and homogeneous emphysema would provide meaningful clinical
benefit.
One example of a minimally invasive treatment is the PneumRx RePneu Lung Volume
Reduction Coil (RePneu LVRC) system that is designed to compress the areas of
lung parenchyma most damaged by emphysema. This device is deployed using a
minimally invasive approach using a simple catheter-based delivery system
through a fiber optic bronchoscope and requires no incision. And the combined
data from 3 studies outside the Unites States investigating the LVRC system
showed statistically significant improvements in pulmonary function, exercise
capacity and quality of life at both 6-Months and 12-Months post treatment.
24 months post treatment the improved pulmonary function, quality of life and
exercise capacity is decreasing. Retreating the patient with the LVR coil
system in other parts of the lung could potentially lead to new improvements in
lung function, dyspnea, exercise capacity and quality of life and may reduce
the rate of decline.
Study objective
Primary Objective:
To investigate the safety and feasibility of re-treating patients with COPD
with the RePneu LVRC system.
Secondary Objective:
To investigate the effectiveness of re-treating patients with COPD with the
RePneu LVRC system on lung function, quality of life measures and functional
measures.
Study design
Non randomized uncontrolled intervention study
Intervention
Patients will receive a lung volume reduction coil treatment by bronchoscopy.
Study burden and risks
The LVR Coil has been designed to be as safe as possible. It was shown that the
risks associated with the LVRC System are largely attributable to the
bronchoscopic procedure itself rather than to the device per se. Therefore, it
appears that the LVRC device itself does not appreciably increase the risk of
serious adverse events beyond the risk of undergoing a bronchoscopy procedure
or simply having emphysema.
Patients will be included if they significantly improved in lung function,
quality of life or exercise after the first treatment with the LVRC system. We
expect that the second treatment with the LVRC will also be beneficial for the
patients. However, it is possible that a patient will not receive any benefits
from the treatment.
Hanzeplein 1
Groningen 9713GZ
NL
Hanzeplein 1
Groningen 9713GZ
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
1) Treated with the RePneu LVRC system > 24 months ago.
2) Six months after the first bilateral treatment with the RePneu LVRC system the patient had a significant improvement above the established minimal important difference (MID)
of 6-minute walk distance (6MWD: 26 meter)
or of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1: 100ml)
or of St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire total score (SGRQ: 4 points).
3) Subject has marked dyspnea scoring >=2 on mMRC scale of 0-4.
4) Subject has stopped smoking for at least 6 months prior to entering the study.
5) Subject read, understood and signed the Informed Consent form.
6) Subject has completed a pulmonary rehabilitation program within 6 months prior to treatment and/or regularly performing maintenance respiratory rehabilitation if initial supervised therapy occurred more than 6 months prior to baseline testing.
7) Subject has received Influenza vaccinations consistent with local recommendations and/or policy.
Exclusion criteria
1) Subject has co-morbidities that may significantly reduce subject*s ability to improve exercise capacity (e.g., severe arthritis, planned knee surgery) or baseline limitation on 6MWT is not due to dyspnea.
2) Subject has severe gas exchange abnormalities as defined by:
PaCO2 >8.0 kPa;
PaO2 < 6.0 kPa (room air).
3) Subject has a history of recurrent clinically significant respiratory infections, defined as 3 hospitalizations for respiratory infection during the year prior to enrollment.
4) Subject has severe pulmonary hypertension defined by right ventricular systolic pressure >50 mm Hg via echocardiogram.
5) Subject has an inability to walk >140 meters in 6 minutes.
6) Subject has evidence of other severe disease (such as, but not limited to, lung cancer or renal failure), which in the judgment of the investigator may compromise survival of the subject for the duration of the study.
7) Subject is pregnant or lactating, or plans to become pregnant within the study timeframe.
8) Subject has an inability to tolerate bronchoscopy under moderate sedation or general anesthesia.
9) Subject has clinically significant bronchiectasis.
10) Subject has giant bullae >1/3 lung volume.
11) Subject has had previous LVR surgery, lung transplantation or lobectomy.
12) Subject has been involved in pulmonary drug or device studies within 30 days prior to this study.
13) Subject is taking >20 mg prednisone (or equivalent dose of a similar steroid) daily.
14) Subject requires high level chronic immunomodulatory therapy to treat a moderate to severe chronic inflammatory autoimmune disorder.
15) Subject is on an antiplatelet (such as Plavix) or anticoagulant therapy (such as heparin or Coumadin) which cannot be stopped for 7 days prior to procedure.
16) Subject has a sensitivity or allergy to Nickel.
17) Subject has a known sensitivity to drugs required to perform bronchoscopy.
18) Subject has any other disease, condition(s) or habit(s) that would interfere with completion of study and follow up assessments, would increase risks of bronchoscopy or assessments, or in the judgment of the investigator would potentially interfere.
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL45374.042.13 |
Other | wordt nog aangemeld bij clinical trials.gov voor aanvang van de studie |