The aim of this study is to evaluate an intervention aimed at improving family disclosure of inherited cancer risks by 1) supporting counselees in what they experience as a necessary, but at times difficult, task and, consequently 2) provide more at…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Chromosomal abnormalities, gene alterations and gene variants
- Malignant and unspecified neoplasms gastrointestinal NEC
- Breast disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The primary outcome constitutes the degree of knowledge, motivation and
self-efficay of counselees with regard to disclosing cancer risks and
preventive measures to relatives.
Secondary outcome
secondary outcomes include:
- the number and proportion of relatives informed by counselees
- relatives' knowledge about hereditary cancer and preventive measures
- relatives' intention to engage in genetic counseling
Background summary
The identification of a hereditary or familial breast or colon cancer risk has
not only implications for the counselee, but also for his or her relatives.
Relatives need to be informed about their possible risk so they can make an
informed decision about whether or not to pursue genetic counseling, testing
and/or preventive breast or colon screening. Generally, fewer relatives present
to genetic services for care than would be expected. Of first degree relatives,
an average of 40% present to genetic services for care. Percentages for 2nd and
3rd degree relatives are even lower. The limited uptake of genetic and
screening services raises the question whether and how at risk relatives are
informed by the counselee. Literature suggests that counselees may encounter
barriers in family disclosure which result from lack of knowledge (e.g. not
knowing who is at risk), not being motivated to inform (e.g. wanting to protect
relatives for negative emotions) and not being able to inform (e.g. loss of
contact).
Study objective
The aim of this study is to evaluate an intervention aimed at improving family
disclosure of inherited cancer risks by 1) supporting counselees in what they
experience as a necessary, but at times difficult, task and, consequently 2)
provide more at risk relatives with the opportunity to make an autonomous, well
informed decision (not) to go for genetic counseling, testing and/or preventive
screening
More specifically, we will aim to answer the following research questions:
Does one additional counselling session, focused at counselees* disclosure of
genetic risk and preventive measures for cancer to relatives lead to
1. counselees feeling more knowledgeable, motivated and capable to disclose
genetic risk information to their at risk relatives, and
2. counselees informing more at risk relatives,
3. increased knowledge about hereditary cancer and preventive measures in
relatives,
4. increased intention among relatives to engage in genetic counseling, testing
and/or preventive screening?
Study design
To this end we propose a randomized clinical trial. Counselees in the control
group (n= 132) will receive standard care. Counselees in the intervention group
(n=132) will receive one additional counseling session, provided by one of five
psycho-social workers, aimed at whether and how best to inform at risk
relatives. This intervention will be based on the principles of Motivational
Interviewing. Assessments, consisting of questionnaires, will take place before
the final scheduled regular genetic counseling session (T1), immediately
following the intervention (T2) and at 4 months after the intervention (T3). A
part of the questionnaire at T2 will be completed together with the researcher
by telephone.
At the final assessment counselees are asked if they are willing to ask
relatives with whom they shared the hereditary risk information to participate
in the study. These relatives will receive one questionnaire.
Intervention
(Index) patients in the intervention group will receive an additional
counseling session aimed at informing at risk relatives. This session will be
delivered by a psycho-social worker and will take place two weeks after they
received the summary letter from the department of Clinical Genetics. This will
allow counselees some time to reflect on the implications of the (test) result
for themselves and their relatives, and to anticipate possible obstacles in
informing at risk relatives. The intervention will be delivered by telephone.
Study burden and risks
The burden of the study will comprise the completion of three questionnaires by
all participating counselees. Completion in total will take 60 minutes.
Counselees in the intervention group will additionally receive a telephone
counselling session delivered by a psychosocial worker. This session will last
on average 30 minutes. Relatives complete one questionnaire.
Meibergdreef 9
Amsterdam 1100 DD
NL
Meibergdreef 9
Amsterdam 1100 DD
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria for counselees:
1) index-patient (the first in their family to visit the department of Clinical Genetics for hereditary or familial colon or breast cancer),
2) at least one relative at increased risk for breast or colon cancer, i.e. eligible for genetic counseling and/or surveillance,
3) aged 18 years and over,
4) able to read and write Dutch and
5) informed consent. ;Inclusion criteria for relatives:
1) permission of the counselee,
2) aged 18 years and over,
3) able to read and write Dutch and
4) informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
1) mentally impaired
2) unable to independently complete a questionnaire
3) they are not literate in Dutch
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
Other | 3745 |
CCMO | NL40153.018.12 |
OMON | NL-OMON25373 |