With this study we aim to predict drinking behaviour at follow-up based on brain activation reflecting reactivity to social alcohol cues and brain activation reflecting anticipation of alcohol intake. In addition, brain activation in response to…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Other condition
- Lifestyle issues
Synonym
Health condition
verslaving
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The main study parameters are self-reported measures of drinking behaviour at
follow up, brain activity during the two cognitive tasks, behavioural indices
of task performance, drinking imitation scores and self reported drinking at
baseline. The end of the study will be reached when 101 participants are
included and tested successfully.
Secondary outcome
- Demographics (age, gender, education)
- Drinking motives: Drinking motive questionnaire (DMQ-R, (Cooper, 1994))
- Alcohol problem drinking measure: the Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index (RAPI-18
(White & Labouvie, 1989))
- Alcohol use: Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (Babor, Higgins-Biddle,
Saunders, & Monteiro, 2001)
- Breath analyzer to tests for alcohol use and smoking.
- Questionnaires
o smoking behaviour
o general well being
o self control
- Weekly drinking (Hajema & Knibbe, 1998)
- Urge to drink: Dutch version of the Desires for Alcohol Questionnaire (DAQ;
Dutch version (Franken, Rosso, & van Honk, 2003).
- General psychopatholgy: Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI, (de
Beurs & Zitman, 2005))
- Self-efficacy: The Young*s Drinking Refusal Self-Efficacy
Questionnaire Revised Adolescents Version (DRSEQ-RA: (Oei et al., 2005; Young
et al., 2007))
Background summary
Alcohol use increases dramatically during (late) adolescence and is related to
alcohol abuse later in life. By getting more insight in processes driving
adolescent drinking behaviour, we may eventually be able to identify
individuals at risk. The incentive sensitization theory (Robinson & Berridge,
1993) proposes that due to repeated drug use, neutral cues associated with drug
use (i.e., drug-related cues) become sensitized through conditioning and
thereby acquire rewarding properties themselves. As adolescent drinking occurs
mostly in social settings and people tend to imitate their drinking company, it
is useful to investigate social alcohol drinking cues. However, the
sensitization of social cues is hardly investigated. Therefore, this study will
investigate the rewarding effects of social alcohol-related cues. Increased
neural reactivity to these social alcohol-related cues may drive a
social-oriented drinking style.
In addition to the reactivity to social alcohol-related cues, we hypothesize
that heavy drinking patterns may be specifically associated with increased
anticipation for alcohol intake itself. Anticipation for reward is strongly
linked to activity in the ventral striatum. We suggest that ventral striatal
brain activation during anticipation of actual alcohol intake is associated
with drinking frequency, with heavy drinkers showing stronger anticipation
effects (i.e., they are more drug-oriented).
Study objective
With this study we aim to predict drinking behaviour at follow-up based on
brain activation reflecting reactivity to social alcohol cues and brain
activation reflecting anticipation of alcohol intake. In addition, brain
activation in response to social alcohol related cues will be related to
real-life imitation of alcohol intake in a social setting. Brain activation
will be measured using fMRI during two different cognitive tasks; 1) a social
alcohol cue exposure task (SACE) which is an alcohol cue exposure task
including social relevant pictures, 2) a drug incentive delay task (DID) which
is a monetary incentive delay task with alcohol (i.e. sips of beer) incentives.
Study design
The study involves three evening test sessions as well as a follow-up
questionnaire battery. The first two sessions will be scheduled in a laboratory
specifically designed to look like a typical Dutch bar (Bar-Lab). The current
study includes a cover story (i.e. evaluation of alcohol advertisements), as
participants should be unaware of the purpose of the study while imitation of
alcohol intake is measured. In the third session, participants will perform the
SACE and DID task while brain activation will be measured using fMRI. 18 months
after study entry, participants are asked to report on their drinking behaviour
through questionnaires.
Study burden and risks
fMRI is a safe and non-invasive method for measuring brain activity.
Importantly, we will only study the effect of a low-to-moderate alcohol dose, a
dose that is relatively low in the context of the levels of alcohol intake
typical for the population from which our sample will be drawn. Additionally,
the session will be immediately terminated when participants consume more than
4 alcoholic drinks, and are only allowed to leave the university building once
their Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) falls below <0.05%.The total amount of
beer consumed in the fMRI scanner is approximately 10 ml, and therefore the BAC
values can be neglected. The study has no therapeutical goals; there are no
benefits for the participants.
Montessorilaan 3
Nijmegen 6525 HR
NL
Montessorilaan 3
Nijmegen 6525 HR
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
- Singed informed consent
- Between 18-25 years old
- Ability to read from a computer screen
- Right-handedness
- Male
- Beer as their alcohol drink of choice
Exclusion criteria
- Head injury
- History of major neurological diseases or psychiatric disorders.
- Regular use of other addictive substances except for nicotine and alcohol
- Use of (psychoactive) medication
- Standard exclusion criteria for MRI scanning.
- Never exposed to alcohol before or currently abstinent
- Alcohol intoxication before testing
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL46095.091.14 |