Primary objective: Is their a difference in gait pattern between patiens with a resurfacing hip arthroplasty compared to a total hip arthroplasty after 5years?
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Other condition
- Joint disorders
Synonym
Health condition
Looppatroon analyse na heupprothesiologie
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
primary objective:
The principal objective is to assess top walking speed in patients who have
undergone either hip resurfacing arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty as part
of a randomised controlled trial.
Secondary outcome
Secondary objective:
1. The following will also be assessed to determine if there is a difference
between patients after resurfacing or total hip arthroplasty: Top walking
incline, ability to run, cadence and stride length.
2. Patient-reported outcome measures: Harris Hip Score (HHS), Western Ontario
and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D), The
University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score will be assessed
to establish patient-reported quality of life after surgery.
Background summary
Total hip replacement surgery is a very successful operation with good
long-term results. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty is offered as a treatment
option for young and active patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. It has
been proposed as a treatment option for younger patients because of claims that
it preserves femoral bone stock and has better functional outcomes. The
assessment of gait after hip replacement surgery may be able to determine
functional differences between patients who have undergone total hip
replacement/arthroplasty (THA) versus hip resurfacing.
Study objective
Primary objective: Is their a difference in gait pattern between patiens with a
resurfacing hip arthroplasty compared to a total hip arthroplasty after 5years?
Study design
This will be a cross sectional/explorative study. All patient, part of a
randomized controlled trial, will be asked to undergo a gait analysis on a
trendmill at 5 years follow up.
Study burden and risks
-There are nog clear benefits associated with participation, except for a
better understanding of patterns of movement after a hip arthroplasty.
-There are no clear risks associated with participations. Patient will be asked
to walk on a trendmill, this will take 15 -20 minutes and they will be asked to
walk only as hard as they feel safe to. When feeling discomfort or pain patient
can stop at any time their gait analysis. The trendmill is provided with all
safety measurement: safety stop button, a safety drawstring and armrests.
Wagnerlaan 55
Arnhem 6800WC
NL
Wagnerlaan 55
Arnhem 6800WC
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
1: Patient part of randomised controlled trial (RCT) of hip resurfacing versus MoM total hip arthroplasty for symptomatic osteoarthritis of the hip versus total hip arthroplasty
2: Patient must be able to consent to the study (written informed consent)
3: Patients who are functioning well post-operatively and not under routine follow up
4: Patients who are able to walk without any safety rail assistance on the treadmill
Exclusion criteria
1: Patient not originally randomised during an RCT of hip resurfacing versus MoM total hip arthroplasty.
2: Patients who suffer from any neurological or musculoskeletal conditions that might make a gait test dangerous.
3: Patients whose cognitive function prevents them from understanding the study.
4: Patients who have had or are awaiting revision surgery for their hip
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
| Register | ID |
|---|---|
| CCMO | NL50830.091.14 |