The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) using the PulmonxEndobronchial Valve (EBV) in treated study participants compared to control participants to support a premarket…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Respiratory disorders NEC
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Primary effectiveness endpoint:
The percentage of study participants in the EBV treatment arm meeting the
clinically significant threshold of 15% or higher improved forced
expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), obtained immediately following
bronchodilator therapy, as compared to the percentage in the control arm at 1
year post-procedure.
Primary safety Endpoint:
Evaluation of the short- and long-term adverse events profile of the EBV
treatment arm during the treatment period, defined as the day of the study
procedure until 45 days after the study procedure (short), and in the
post-treatment period, defined as 46 days after the study procedure until the
1-year follow-up visit (long).
Secondary outcome
Secondary Effectiveness Measures:
Treatment Lobe Volume Reduction (TLVR) for the Treatment Arm
* TLVR, measured as the *absolute change from baseline* for treated lobe volume
as seen via HRCT (high resolution computed tomography), will be evaluated at 45
days and 1 year.
* TLVR, measured as the *percentage change from baseline* for treated lobe
volume as seen via HRCT, will be evaluated at 45 days and 1 year.
St. George*s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)
* Difference between study arms in *absolute change from baseline* for SGRQ
score at 1 year.
FEV1
* Persistence of treatment effect will be evaluated by determining the
difference between study arms for *absolute change from baseline* for FEV1 at
45 days, 6 months, and 1 year.
* Persistence of treatment effect will be evaluated by determining the
difference between study arms for *percentage change from baseline* for FEV1 at
45 days, 6 months, and 1 year.
6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)
* Difference between study arms in *absolute change from baseline* for 6MWD at
1 year.
* Difference between study arms in *percentage change from baseline* for 6MWD
at 1 year.
Background summary
Patients with severe emphysema suffer from severe dyspnea and a poor quality of
life, with no current effective medical treatment. Only for a very small,
highly selective group of COPD patients, very invasive surgical procedures like
lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) or lungtransplantation are available.
Minimally invasive bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) techniques
through the implantation of one-way valves have now been established as a means
of treating the hyperinflation of emphysema for a group of selected
patients.clinical evidence indicates that by achieving lobar occlusion in the
absence of collateral ventilation, significant lung volume reduction can be
obtained with associated good clinical responses. The Chartis Pulmonary
Assessment System which assesses collateral ventilation has shown 75% accuracy
in predicting response.
Study objective
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of
bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) using the Pulmonx
Endobronchial Valve (EBV) in treated study participants compared to control
participants to support a premarket approval application to
FDA.
Study design
This will be a multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled study with EBV
treatment statistically evaluated using Intent-to-Treat (ITT)
analyses. A maximum of 183 study participants, who meet study entry criteria,
consisting of screening eligibility criteria, baseline
eligibility criteria, and procedure eligibility criteria, will be enrolled at a
maximum of 22 centers.
Intervention
The Pulmonx Zephyr Endobronchial Valve (EBV) is an implantable bronchial valve
intended to decrease volume in targeted regions of
the lung. It is indicated for the treatment of patients with hyperinflation
associated with severe heterogeneous emphysema in regions of the lung that have
little or no collateral ventilation as assessed by the Chartis System.
Study burden and risks
The patients that will be included in the study will have to come to our
outpatient clinic, perform pulmonary function testing, a 6 min walking test,
HRCT scanning, thoracic x-ray, fill in questionnaires and testing of blood
samples and arterial blood gas. For the actual treatment with bronchoscopy
under general anesthesia the patients will stay 6 nights in our hospital. For
the follow-up, the patients will visit the hospital (7x or 5x), which will
include 1 CT scan and pulmonary function tests, questionnaires and exercise
testing (6MWT). The included patients will have to put large effort in the
study, but is in balance with the expected outcome and very limited compared
'alternative' treatments like highly invasive surgery: Lung volume reduction
surgery or Lung transplantation. All included patients have a severe limitation
of their activities of daily living. With the development and validation of the
use of the lung volume reduction treatment with the placement of valves, does
it seem possible to give relieve of shortness of breath and improvement in
exercise performance. Furthermore, this technique can be used as a 'bridge' to
lung transplantation in future, or will be the only possible therapeutic tool
available by them. The risks are not bigger than the risks any individual has
for the investigations described. The treatment with the valves and inducing
the significant volume reduction the major risks involved are: Pneumothorax (1
in 4 patients) for which chest drainage is required, transient (1-3 days) chest
pain (1 in 2 patients), transient (1-7 days) and dyspnea (1 in 4 patients).
Rue de La Treille 4
Neuchatel 2000
CH
Rue de La Treille 4
Neuchatel 2000
CH
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
1. Signed Screening or Study Procedure Informed Consent using a form that was reviewed and approved by the IRB;
2. Age 40 to 75 years;
3. BMI less than 35 kg/m2;
4 Stable with less than 20 mg prednisone (or equivalent) per day;
5 Nonsmoking for 4 months prior to screening interview.
6.Completed a supervised pulmonary rehabilitation program less than equal to 6 months prior to the baseline exam or is regularly performing maintenance respiratory rehabilitation if initial supervised therapy occurred greater than 6 months prior
7.FEV1 between 15% and 45% of predicted value at baseline exam
Post-rehabilitation 6-minute walk distance between 100 meters and 500 meters at baseline exam
8.Current Pneumococcus vaccination & Current Influenza vaccination
9.Little or no collateral ventilation (CV-) as determined using the Chartis System
Exclusion criteria
1. Currently enrolled in another clinical trial studying an experimental treatment;
2. Previously enrolled in this study for which protocol required follow up is not complete;
3. Clinically significant (greater than 4 tablespoons per day) sputum production;
4. Two or more COPD exacerbation episodes requiring hospitalization in the last year at screening;
5. Two or more instances of pneumonia episodes in the last year at screening;
6. Unplanned weight loss >10% usual weight <90 days prior to enrollment;
7. History of exercise-related syncope;
8. Myocardial Infarction or congestive heart failure within 6 months of screening;
9. Prior lung transplant, LVRS, bullectomy or lobectomy;
10. Clinically significant bronchiectasis;
11. Unable to safely discontinue anti-coagulants or platelet activity inhibitors for 7 days;
12. Uncontrolled pulmonary hypertension (systolic pulmonary arterial pressure > 45 mm Hg) or evidence or history of CorPulmonale as determined by recent echocardiogram (completed within the last 3 months prior to screening visit);
13. Pulmonary nodule requiring surgery as noted by chest X-ray or CT scan;
14. HRCT collected per CT scanning protocol within the last 3 months of screening date and evaluated by clinical site personnel using 510k cleared CT software shows:
a Parenchymal destruction score of greater than 75% in all three right lobes or both left lobes
b Emphysema heterogeneity score less than 15%
c Large bullae encompassing greater than 30% of either lung
d Insufficient landmarks to evaluate the CT study using the software as it is intended;
15. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 45% as determined by recent echocardiogram (completed within the last 3 months prior to screening visit);
16. Resting bradycardia (<50 beats/min), frequent multifocal PVCs, complex ventricular arrhythmia, sustained SVT;
17. Dysrhythmia that might pose a risk during exercise or training;
18. Post-bronchodilator FEV1 less than 15% or greater than 45% of predicted value at screening;
19. TLC less than 100% predicted (determined by body plethysmography) at screening;
20. RV less than 175% predicted (determined by body plethysmography) at screening;
21. DLCO less than 20% predicted value at screening;
22. 6-minute walk distance less than 100 meters or greater than 450 meters at screening;
23. PaCO2 greater than 50mm Hg (Denver greater than 55 mm Hg) on room air at screening;
24. PaO2 less than 45 mm Hg (Denver less than 30 mm Hg) on room air at screening;
25. Elevated white cell count (>10,000 cells/mcL) at screening;
26. Presence of alpha-1 anti-trypsin deficiency as determined by local laboratory ranges;
27. Plasma cotinine level greater than 13.7 ng/ml (or arterial carboxyhemoglobin > 2.5% if using nicotine products) at screening;
28. Any disease or condition that interferes with completion of initial or follow-up assessments.
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT01796392 |
CCMO | NL50814.042.14 |