The hypothesis is that individual music therapy intervention, according to professional standards, will lead to more symptom reduction of BPSD and a better quality of life based on parameters observed by care givers, compared with listening to music…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Structural brain disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Primary outcome will be the difference in symptom reduction and the score on a
quality-of-life standard inventory for the three intervention groups.
Besides the result of a time-series analysis of communication and engagement
parameters, as can be graphically shown for individual cases, following a
person-centred care model.
Secondary outcome
1. To show if music therapy intervention is particularly effective in any of
the clusters of BPSD symptoms: Hyperactivity, psychosis, affective disturbances
or apathy.
2. The effect of the interventions on care giver burden and family members,
based on the NPI-Q sub scale
3. To show if the therapist for the music therapy intervention can make a
correct calculation of the expected effect of the intervention, based on a
simple visual analogue scale measurement (Cantril's ladder) at the onset of the
therapy (anticipating on further cost effectiveness studies).
4. To show a correlation between the (patient-centred) evolution of well-being
and engagement in the time-series analysis, with the scores on NPI and Qualidem
in the RCT part of the study.
Background summary
Behavioral an psychological symptoms in dementia (BPSD) are core clinical
features that worsen functional decline and quality of life for patients in
health care settings and their caregivers. Concerns have been raise about the
efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions. Moreover such
interventions pass over the unmet needs of patients who develop some behavioral
symptoms. Music therapy might be a suitable alternative, particularly also
because the patient is invited to participate en communicate possible needs in
a non-verbal way. Studies of music therapy interventions are often small,
loosely designed and poorly reported. We designed a single blind randomized
controlled study in which individual music therapy intervention is compared
with the possible effect of music only (by sound source) and the psychosocial
care as usual, where special attention is paid during activities.
in a parallel investigation the development of individual well-being and
engagement can be observed in a standardised longitudinal way, during the
interventions, because this might be a prerequisite for recovery of discomfort
that might be the cause of BPSD symptoms. Only tentative experience with such
an approach is available and a "time-series analysis" for the implementation of
person-centred care principles in the study outcome might be considered as a
proof of concept.
Study objective
The hypothesis is that individual music therapy intervention, according to
professional standards, will lead to more symptom reduction of BPSD and a
better quality of life based on parameters observed by care givers, compared
with listening to music with a sound resource or the psychosocial interventions
as usual in a particular care setting.
It is further expected that well-being and engagement, according to
patient-centred care standards, wil show a positive development during the
music therapy interventions, which might be shown by longitudinal registration
of communication and participation scales (CODEM en PRS, respectively). To
demonstrate this a time-series analysis method is introduced, partly as a proof
of concept for further studies on this subject.
Study design
172 people with dementia and any kind of behavioral problem (BPSD) for which an
intervention is warranted, will be recruited from about 20 psychogeriatric
departments. Participants will be randomized after informed consent to get any
of the three following interventions: Individual music therapy, music listening
by sound resource or psychosocial intervention as usual.
Interventions will take place during 3 weeks, every week 3 interventions of 45
minutes. Before the start NPI and Qualidem are scored by a blinded test
assistent. During the 3 weeks of the intervention NPI and Qualidem will be
scored again. Three weeks after ending of the treatment period a further score
of NPI and Qualidem will be performed in order to show a carry-over effect
after the treatment period.
During the intervention period video registrations of 9 participants in each
treatment arm will be recorded 2 times during the intervention.
Based on standardized longitudinal observation methods scales for communication
(CODEM) and engagement (PRS) will be scored by a trained observator. The
evolution of well-being and engagement will be registered in a standardized
way, according to a Time-series analysis method.
Intervention
The interventions (music therapy, passive listening to music and psychosocial
activities) are already in use in dementia care settings.
Study burden and risks
We don't expect any particular burden or risk for the participants, apart from
the burden they already have from their behavioral symptoms in the
institutionalized care setting.
Nieuw Eyckholt 300
Heerlen 6419 DJ
NL
Nieuw Eyckholt 300
Heerlen 6419 DJ
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
a. Dementia according to international guidelines (any etiology)
b. Behavioral or psychological symptoms (BPSD) for which additional care or intervention is needed (according to treating specialist)
c. Agreement and informed consent from patient or formal family/care givers for participation
d. Practical feasibility of professional music therapy, during 3 joined weeks, 3 days a week
e. Availability of activity coaches or care professionals who can adjust the passive music (GDI) or activities (PSI) based on instructions during introductory course.
f. Availability of some room and the time needed for a test assistent (TA) for the administration of psychometric scales.
g. The participant has no limitations of hearing or sensory disturbance which seriously interfere with any of the interventions.
Exclusion criteria
a. Exclusion of causes (somatic or contextual) for which pharmacological or other treatment is needed first
b. Refusal of patient or formal caregivers (particularly also in the case of incompetence of will)
c. Delirium
d. New psychopharmacological treatment in past 2 weeks
e Hearing loss or disturbance of consciousness
f. Palliative care setting or life expectancy < 2 months
g. No guarantee that care or intervention can be continued
h. Senosory disturbances that seriously interfere with any of the interventions
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL60766.096.17 |
OMON | NL-OMON21011 |