The aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and acceptability of abatacept therapy in subjects at high risk of developing RA.
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Other condition
- Autoimmune disorders
Synonym
Health condition
gewrichsaandoeningen
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The primary endpoint of this study is the time to development of clinical
synovitis or RA defined by one of the following methods, whichever is met first:
1) The time to development of clinically apparent synovitis in * 3 joints, as
determined by two independent assessors with experience in clinical assessment
of RA
2) The time to development of RA according to the ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria,
where joint involvement is defined as joint swelling.
In either case joint swelling will be confirmed by ultrasound.
Secondary outcome
The secondary efficacy parameters will include:
1. Assessments for the development of RA according to the ACR/EULAR 2010
criteria, where ultrasound assessments will be included.
2. Assessments of disease activity using DAS28 (tender and swollen joint
counts, patient global visual analogue score {VAS}, ESR).
3. Extended Joint Counts 68/66.
4. Simple Disease Activity Score (SDAI) and Clinical Disease Activity Score
(CDAI)
5. Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores, EQ-5D scores and FACIT-F
scores. Analysis of
Pain VAS, Lifestyle Factors Questionnaire, modified Illness Perception
Questionnaire, Hospital
Anxiety and Depression scale and Work Instability Scale will also be included.
6. Progression of radiographic changes in X-rays of the hands and feet scored
by van der Heijde
Sharpe Modified Scores and/or by Larsen scores.
7. Changes in scores of synovitis and vascularity defined by high resolution
ultrasonography and power Doppler over time.
8. Adverse events.
9. Immune signatures derived from the analysis of biological samples.
Background summary
Rheumatoid arthritis is a common chronic inflammatory immune-mediated disease
of joints. If not adequately treated the condition leads to destruction of
synovial joints and significant disability. RA is costly to individuals and
their families; one third of patients with arthritis stop work within 2 years
of onset because of their disease.
The introduction of therapeutic strategies that focus on early, intensive
treatment with synthetic and biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs
(DMARDs) has transformed the treatment of RA. Clinical trials have
demonstrated that this approach leads to higher proportions of patients
achieving periods of sustained clinical remission. This is associated with
improved function and slowing or even prevention of joint damage over time.
Indeed, intensive *treat-to-target* strategies in patients with very early RA
can subsequently lead to extended periods of drug free remission in a subset of
patients. If the pre-clinical phase of disease could be defined with accuracy,
targeting therapy to those at highest risk of developing the more severe form
of disease would have the potential to prevent or at the very least delay the
onset of RA. Were such an approach to be successful, symptoms and signs of
arthritis, disability and the potential risks of unemployment could be
prevented, and the development of potentially life-threatening co-morbidities
associated with chronic inflammatory diseases, such as cardiovascular disease
and infection, substantially reduced.
The combination of the serum ACPA and joint pain (termed arthralgia), in the
absence of clinically detectable synovitis, is considered to most accurately
define subjects at high risk of progressing to RA. Data from longitudinal
observational cohorts indicate that ~ 40% of such subjects progress to
clinically apparent arthritis within 18 months. The combination of IgM
rheumatoid factor (RF) and high serum ACPA levels define those at highest risk;
recent unpublished data indicate that the risk of developing disease in
subjects with high titre ACPA in the absence of RF may be comparable to
ACPA+RF+ subjects. It follows from this that ACPA+RF+ or ACPA+RF-arthralgia
individuals would provide a valid target population for therapeutic
intervention aimed at prevention of the syndrome we recognise as RA.
Study objective
The aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and
acceptability of abatacept therapy in subjects at high risk of developing RA.
Study design
A randomised, placebo controlled clinical trial of abatacept in ACPA+
rheumatoid factor (RF)+ or ACPA+ subjects with arthralgia.
206 subjects will be recruited to the study. (181 in the UK and 25 in the
Netherlands). If recruitment is going well it is poosible to recruit more
patients. Recruitment is possible till 31-1-2018.
Intervention
Study subjects will be randomised 1:1 to receive weekly injections of abatacept
(125mg) or placebo, administered by subcutaneous injection
Study burden and risks
Risk for the patient
* Blood sampling: pain during blood collection, bruising or bleeding after
blood collection, minor dizziness and in rare cases infection can occur as a
result of blood sampling.
* Medication use: possible side effects of the study medication (see page 27
and 28 of the protocol)
Burden for the patient
* 10 outpatient visits (1 screening, 1 baseline en 8 follow-up visits)
* 52 weeks weekly injection
* 3 x X-rays of hands and feet
* 5x ultrasonography of selected joints (wrists, hands and feet)*
* 1x chest X-ray
* 10x blood and urine collection
* Completion of patient diary
* Completion of 9 questionnaires (6 questionnaires 5x, 1 questionnaire 9x, 1
questionnaire 2x and 1 questionnaire 1x)
Albinusdreef 2
Leiden 2333 ZA
NL
Albinusdreef 2
Leiden 2333 ZA
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
- Male or female subjects, aged * 18 years.
- Arthralgia that is considered to be inflammatory in nature.
- ACPA and RF positive, or high titre ACPA.
- Able and willing to give written informed consent and comply with the
requirements of the study protocol.
Exclusion criteria
- Clinically apparent arthritis, as assessed by a rheumatologist.
- A history of inflammatory arthritis, as assessed by a rheumatologist.
- History or current use of DMARDs or biologics.
- History of oral or parenteral use of corticosteroids within the last 12 weeks.
- Co-morbidities requiring treatment with immunosuppressive or immune
modulating therapy.
- Chronic illnesses that would, in the opinion of the investigator, put the
subject at risk.
- Recipients of a live vaccine within 4 weeks of inclusion.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding
- Unable to give informed consent
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
EudraCT | EUCTR2013-003413-18-NL |
CCMO | NL53081.058.15 |
Other | NTR |