The objective of this study is to compare safety and efficacy of a haploidentical T cell depleted HSCT and adjunctive treatment with ATIR101 versus a haploidentical T cell replete HSCT with post-transplant administration of high dose…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Leukaemias
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The primary endpoint of the study is GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS).
GRFS is defined as time from randomization until grade III/IV acute
graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), chronic GVHD requiring systemic
immunosuppressive treatment, disease relapse, or death, whichever occurs first.
This endpoint captures both safety and efficacy.
Secondary outcome
Secondary endpoints:
Overall survival (OS)
Progression-free survival (PFS)
Relapse-related mortality (RRM)
Transplant-related mortality (TRM)
Immune reconstitution
Incidence and severity of acute and chronic GVHD
Incidence and severity of viral, fungal, and bacterial infections (efficacy)
Incidence and severity of adverse events (safety)
Quality of life
Background summary
For many patients with a hematologic malignancy, a hematopoetic stem cell
transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curative option. The use of a matched
(related or unrelated) donor is considered standard of care for patients who
are eligible for an HSCT. However, a significant number of patients do not
receive this potentially life-saving treatment, because a suitable matched
related or unrelated donor cannot be found in a timely manner or cannot be
found at all.
An alternative is the use of mismatched relatives who are partially matched to
the recipient, as a stem cell donor (haploidentical donor). However, an HSCT
from a haploidentical donor is not without risk for the patient. These risks
include infection, graft rejection, graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD), relapse
and adverse reactions to concomitant therapies (e.g., radiation, chemotherapy,
anti-viral drugs).
The haploidentical transplantation procedure has become feasible through the
use of methods to remove donor T-cells from the graft, in order to reduce the
risk of GVHD. Downside of this approach is that patients can remain severely
immune compromised for more than 1 year after the transplantation with a high
risk of life-threatening complications resulting in high transplant-related
mortality (TRM) rates and low overall survival (OS).
ATIR101 is a cell-based, personalized medicinal product manufactured for one
specific recipient using apheresis material from a donor. ATIR101 a
T-lymphocyte enriched leukocyte preparation depleted ex vivo of host
alloreactive T-cells. A haploidentical stem cell transplantation followed by
ATIR101 can offer patients in need of an HSCT, who lack a suitable HLA-matched
sibling or unrelated donor, a potentially life-saving treatment. Because
ATIR101 consists of a high dose of donor lymphocytes, which have been depleted
of host alloreactive T-cells, patients are expected to be protected from
life-threatening infections without increasing the risk of life-threatening
GVHD. Moreover, the possibility that the anti-tumor effects of T-cells in
ATIR101 have been preserved could provide another benefit to patients. This
potential graft versus leukemia effect could reduce the risk of relapse and
thereby further increase the probability of long-term survival.
In conclusion, the development of a therapy that allows early immune protection
and reconstitution following a haploidentical HSCT without increasing the risk
of life-threatening (acute) GVHD can significantly improve the clinical outcome
of patients by preventing TRM caused by acute GVHD and/or infections and
possibly relapse. In addition, the possibility to use mismatched
(haploidentical) family donors can provide a significant advantage for many
patients for whom a suitable matched donor is not available. Therefore,
participation in this study provides patients the prospect of direct benefit.
Study objective
The objective of this study is to compare safety and efficacy of a
haploidentical T cell depleted HSCT and adjunctive treatment with ATIR101
versus a haploidentical T cell replete HSCT with post-transplant administration
of high dose cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in patients with a hematologic malignancy.
An additional objective of the study is to compare the effect of the two
treatments on quality of life.
Study design
Study CR-AIR-009 is a Phase III randomized controlled multicenter open-label
study comparing two parallel groups. After signing informed consent, a total of
about 250 patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either a TCD
HSCT (CD34 selection) from a related, haploidentical donor, followed by ATIR101
infusion, or a T cell replete HSCT, followed by a high dose of PTCy.
Randomization will use minimization to balance treatment groups with respect to
underlying disease (AML, ALL, or MDS), DRI (intermediate risk, high risk, or
very high risk) and center. A stochastic treatment allocation procedure will be
used so that the treatment assignment is random for all patients entered in the
study.
Patients randomized in the ATIR101 group will receive a single ATIR101 dose of
2×10E6 viable T-cells/kg between 28 and 32 days after the HSCT.
All patients will be followed up for at least 24 months post HSCT. Patient
follow-up beyond 24 months post HSCT will be discontinued when a total number
of 156 GRFS events has been reached.
Intervention
Patients randomized in the ATIR101 group will receive a single ATIR101 dose of
2×10E6 viable T-cells/kg between 28 and 32 days on top of a T-cell depleted,
CD34 selected HSCT. Patients in the PtCY group will be treated with T-cell
replete HSCT and post-transplant high dose- cyclosphosphamide ("Baltimore
protocol").
All patients will be followed up for at least 24 months post HSCT.
Study burden and risks
The development of a therapy that allows early immune protection and
reconstitution following a haploidentical HSCT without increasing the risk of
life-threatening (acute) GVHD can significantly improve the clinical outcome of
patients by preventing TRM caused by acute GVHD and/or infections and possibly
relapse. In addition, the possibility to use mismatched (haploidentical) family
donors can provide a significant advantage for many patients for whom a
suitable matched donor is not available. Therefore, participation in this study
provides patients the prospect of direct benefit.
Paasheuvelweg 25A
Amsterdam-Zuidoost 1105 BP
NL
Paasheuvelweg 25A
Amsterdam-Zuidoost 1105 BP
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
1. Any of the following hematologic malignancies:
- Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first cytomorphological remission (with < 5%
blasts in the bone marrow) with Disease Risk Index (DRI) intermediate or above,
or in second or higher cytomorphological remission (with < 5% blasts in the
bonemarrow)
- Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first or higher remission (with < 5%
blasts in the bone marrow)
- Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS): transfusion-dependent (requiring at least one
transfusion per month), or intermediate or higher IPSS-R risk group.
2. Clinical justification of allogeneic stem cell transplantation where a
suitable HLA matched sibling or unrelated donor is unavailable in a timely
manner.
3. Availability of a related haploidentical donor with one fully shared
haplotype and 2 to 4 mismatches at the HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 loci of the
unshared haplotype, as determined by high resolution HLA typing
4. Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) >= 70%
5. Male or female, age >= 18 years and <= 70 years
6. Patient weight >= 25 kg and <= 130 kg
7. Availability of a donor aged >= 16 years and <= 75 years who is eligible
according to local requirements and regulations . Donors aged < 16 years are
allowed if they are the only option for an HSCT, if they are permitted by local
regulations, and if the IRB/IEC approves participation in the study.
8. For females of childbearing potential who are sexually active and males who
have sexual contact with a female of childbearing potential: willingness to use
reliable methods of contraception (oral contraceptives, intrauterine device,
hormone implants, contraceptive injection or abstinence) during study
participation
9. Given written informed consent (patient and donor)
Exclusion criteria
1. Diagnosis of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML)
2. Availability of a suitable HLA-matched sibling or unrelated donor in a donor
search
3. Prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
4. Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (hemoglobin corrected DLCO) < 50%
predicted
5. Left ventricular ejection fraction < 45% (evaluated by echocardiogram or
MUGA scan)
6. AST and/or ALT > 2.5 × ULN (CTCAE grade 2)
7. Creatinine clearance < 50 ml/min (calculated or measured)
8. Positive pregnancy test or breastfeeding of patient or donor (women of
childbearing age only)
9. Estimated probability of surviving less than 3 months
10. Known allergy to any of the components of ATIR101 (e.g., dimethyl sulfoxide)
11. Known hypersensitivity to cyclophosphamide or any of its metabolites
12. Any contraindication for GVHD prophylaxis with mycophenolate mofetil,
cyclosporine A, or tacrolimus
13. Known presence of HLA antibodies against the non-shared donor haplotype
14. Positive viral test of the patient or donor for HIV-1, HIV-2, HBV (active
viral replication by PCR), HCV (active viral replication by PCR), Treponema
pallidum, HTLV 1 (if tested), HTLV-2 (if tested), WNV (if tested), or Zika
virus (if tested) (HBV/HCV: Only patients with active infection or infection
history and donors with active infection are excluded)
15. Any other condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, makes the
patient or donor ineligible for the study
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
EudraCT | EUCTR2016-004672-21-NL |
ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT02999854 |
CCMO | NL61672.000.17 |