The primary objective of this study is to determine brain activation in response to olfactory (orthonasal) exposure to different fat levels contained in a ecologically-relevant fat source.
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Other condition
Synonym
Health condition
brain activation
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Changes in brain activation (BOLD signal) due to olfactory exposure to
different fat levels.
Secondary outcome
- Fat discrimination ability (assessed using the DR A-not A discrimination
testing methodology)
- Quantitative ratings for odour intensity and liking, obtained using a
continuous 100-unit visual analogue scale (VAS).
Background summary
Consumption of dietary fat is exceeding recommended daily intake requirements
in many Western diets. Due to its high energy density and low effect on
satiation (especially in obese individuals) it is considered a major
contributing factor to energy overconsumption and consequential development of
obesity and related comorbidities. To help reduce the public health burden of
excessive fat consumption, the understanding of its perception is crucial.
The alluring flavour of fat arises from a synergy between gustation,
somatosensation, as well as olfaction. Although the role of olfaction in the
perception of dietary fat is relatively unexplored, an increasing body of
evidence underscores the importance of odours in fat perception. It has been
established that humans are capable of detecting and discriminating between
fatty acids using solely olfactory cues. Moreover, research shows that humans
are also capable of detecting minute fat content differences in actual foods.
In our previous two experiments (manuscript submitted for publication; see "K3
Retrofat Study Manuscript* for the submitted manuscript), we replicated
previous findings on olfactory fat perception in real foods and extended them
by showing that humans are also capable of discriminating food fat content
solely based on retronasal olfaction. These findings support the notion that
humans possess a functional olfaction-based system for detecting food fat
content, however, the underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated.
In contrast to oral fat perception, which has been investigated in numerous
neurobiological studies, the underlying neurobiological mechanisms of olfactory
fat perception remain unexplored. In fact, our literature search did not yield
a single study investigating how olfactory exposure to fat sources is
represented in the human brain. The research proposed in the current protocol
therefore aims at filling this knowledge gap, by uncovering the neural
mechanisms underlying olfactory fat perception and mapping relevant brain
areas. We hypothesise that brain activation in reward-related brain areas will
differ between the fat levels. Specifically, we expect that exposure to higher
fat levels will result in a higher level of activation in the VS (NaC, VP),
VTA, PFC (including OFC), ACC, amygdala, hippocampus, and insula.
See "1. Introduction and Rationale" of the research protocol for more
information.
Study objective
The primary objective of this study is to determine brain activation in
response to olfactory (orthonasal) exposure to different fat levels contained
in a ecologically-relevant fat source.
Study design
The study follows a randomized, counterbalanced, within-subjects design in
which brain responses to olfactory (orthonasal) exposure to three fat
concentrations (low, medium, high) will be measured.
Intervention
During fMRI, odours from fat sources will be presented using an olfactometer.
Ratings of odour liking, and intensity will be collected using 100-unit Visual
Analogue Scales.
Study burden and risks
The study is non-therapeutic to the subjects. No immediate benefits for the
subjects are expected from participation in this study, and the risk associated
with participation can be considered negligible. In terms of time, the
subject*s burden is as follows: 30 minutes for the screening/training session;
35 minutes for discrimination testing session; and 1 hour and 10 minutes for
the fMRI task session. In total, the time burden amounts to 2 hours and 15
minutes.
Undergoing an fMRI scan involves: exposure to loud noise (addressed with ear
protection) and a moderate amount of physical restraint (the head is inside an
fMRI coil - this feeling is similar to wearing a motorbike helmet). During the
test session, subjects will smell odours that originate from commercially
available, considered safe, and commonly consumed food products. These odours
will be embedded within a constant stream of odourless air (delivered via an
olfactometer), heated to body temperature and humidified to 80% relative
humidity.
Stippeneng 4
Wageningen 6708WE
NL
Stippeneng 4
Wageningen 6708WE
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
- Aged 18 - 55 at the time of inclusion
- Normal BMI (18.5 - 25 kg/m2)
- Self-reported healthy (see *F1-1 Screening Questionnaire*)
- Willing to comply to study procedures
- Willing to be informed about incidental findings of pathology and approving
of reporting this to their general physician
- Being a consumer of dairy milk (at least once per week)
- Having a normally functioning sense of smell (scoring at least 12/16 on the
Sniffin* Sticks test)
- Being right-handed (as brain anatomy differences exist between left- and
right- handed individuals)
Exclusion criteria
- Regular smoker (smoking one or more cigarettes per day)
- Having any dairy-related allergies or intolerances (self-reported).
- Being pregnant, lactating or planning on becoming pregnant during the study
period
- Having a psychiatric, neurological, or eating disorder
- Being employed by the Division of Human Nutrition and Health of Wageningen
University
- Participation in another medical-scientific study
MRI-related Exlcusion Criteria:
- Claustrophobic (self-reported)
- Having a contra-indication to MRI scanning (including, but not limited to):
- Pacemakers and defibrillators
- Epilepsy or family history of epilepsy
- Intraorbital or intraocular metallic fragments
- Ferromagnetic implants
- Presence of non-removable piercings on the head
- Limited sight that is not corrected with contact lenses or cannot be
corrected with our MRI safe glasses (maximum strength is +6 and -6)
- For women: lactating, being pregnant, or using an IUD as anti-conceptive
(with exception of the Mirena IUD, which is MRI safe).
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL78261.091.21 |