1. To determine the accuracy (i.e. sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV) of: a. A molecular stool test, i.e. Cologuard® (Exact Sciences, Madison, WI, USA) consisting of a stool DNA test and an immunochemical assay for human hemoglobin;b. FIT: OC-…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Malignant and unspecified neoplasms gastrointestinal NEC
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
1. The accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV) of the molecular stool
test (Cologuard®) and FIT compared to colonoscopy in the detection of advanced
neoplasia compared in a surveillance population.
2. Health outcomes and cost-effectivess of multiple surveillance strategies
based on accuracies from endpoint 1.
Secondary outcome
- The accuracy of the molecular stool test (Cologuard®) and FIT in relation to
patient characteristics ((i.e. age, gender, family history, BMI and smoking);
- The presence of the molecular markers (included in the molecular stool test)
in the resected polyps;
- The correlation between the presence of the molecular markers and the result
of the molecular stool test.
- The identification of low- and high risk adenomas based on previously
identified progression biomarkers in all the post-polypectomy tissue samples;
- The impact of molecularly defined high-risk adenoma*s on the obtained
sensitivity data of the molecular stool test (Cologuard®) and FIT;
- The impact of the integration of molecularly defined high-risk adenoma*s on
the health outcomes and cost-effectiveness of the multiple surveillance
strategies.
- The additional value of risk assessment through a questionnaire (addressing
gender, age, BMI20,21, family history22,23, physical activity, nutritional
habits and smoking) on the accuracy of the molecular stool test (Cologuard®)
and FIT;
Background summary
With more than 13.000 new patients and >5.000 deaths per year in the
Netherlands, colorectal cancer (CRC) poses a big health problem. Screening for
early stage, treatable tumours is a cost-effective approach to tackle this
problem. Therefore, population-wide CRC screening was implemented in the
Netherlands in 2014, using the Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT). About 6% of
screenees will test positive, yielding approximately 80.000 extra colonoscopies
per year. Of these screenees >40% will have (advanced) adenomas and most of
them will qualify for surveillance colonoscopies according to the current
guideline.
While post-polypectomy surveillance consumes about 25% of colonoscopy capacity,
experts agree that evidence for the impact of colonoscopic post-polypectomy
surveillance on the ultimate endpoint, i.e. death from CRC, is limited and
current surveillance strategies lead to overdiagnosis and over-treatment. The
revised Dutch surveillance guideline (2013), although more risk-based than the
previous guidelines and than international guidelines, will not be able to
solve this. Besides the overuse, colonoscopy is an invasive procedure with a
burden and also a risk for complications. Therefore there is a need for
alternative, preferably non-invasive, surveillance tests.
Stool-based molecular testing may well be an alternative for colonoscopy
surveillance as molecular tests are more specific than colonoscopy for relevant
adenomas and less burdensome for patients. While the sensitivity of a single
molecular test for the detection of cancers and advanced adenomas is lower than
that of colonoscopy, an approach of repeated molecular tests (e.g. biennially)
may yield similar detection rates as a colonoscopy based surveillance
programme. If validated for this purpose, stool-based molecular surveillance
tests has the potential to dramatically decrease the demand for colonoscopy
capacity.
Study objective
1. To determine the accuracy (i.e. sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV) of:
a. A molecular stool test, i.e. Cologuard® (Exact Sciences, Madison, WI, USA)
consisting of a stool DNA test and an immunochemical assay for human hemoglobin;
b. FIT: OC-sensor® (Eiken Chemical Co., Tokyo, Japan) and FOB GoldTM (Sentinel,
Milan, Italy);
in the detection of advanced neoplasia compared to colonoscopy in a
surveillance population.
2. To model various strategies of surveillance based on colonoscopy or
alternative surveillance tools using the obtained accuracy data from the
molecular stool test (Cologuard®) and FIT.
Study design
The current project is designed as a prospective observational cross-sectional
cohort study.
Through this design, rates of advanced neoplasia as detected by the molecular
stool test (Cologuard®) and FIT will be compared to the results as detected by
colonoscopy. Colonoscopy in combination with histology is considered the gold
standard for the diagnosis of advanced neoplasia. All subjects scheduled for
(elective) colonoscopy surveillance in the participating centres (i.e. AMC,
Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Slotervaart Hospital, MUMC, Kennemer Gasthuis
Haarlem and Flevoziekenhuis Almere) who are eligible for this study according
to the in- and exclusion criteria, will be invited to participate. Necessary
faeces collection is scheduled at home just before the surveillance colonoscopy
and before bowel preparation. Participants receive a questionnaire before the
scheduled colonoscopy to assess risk-factors for CRC.
Study burden and risks
Burden for participant consists of at home faeces collection and the completion
of a questionnaire.
Plesmanlaan 121
Amsterdam 1066 CX
NL
Plesmanlaan 121
Amsterdam 1066 CX
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
- Subjects in the age group 50-75 years.
- Subjects with an indication for surveillance colonoscopy according to the
previous guideline (*Follow up after polypectomy*, 2002; summarized in 2008) or
current (*Colonoscopy Surveillance*, 2013) guideline, i.e. subjects with a
history of CRC or polypectomy, as well as subjects under surveillance for
familial colorectal carcinoma (FCC).
- Subjects who have sufficient comprehension of the Dutch language.
- Subjects who have given their informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
- Subjects with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)
- Subjects with Lynch syndrome, familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP),
attenuated FAP (AFAP), MUTYH associated polyposis (MAP) and serrated polyposis
syndrome (SPS)
- Subjects with a previous colonoscopy < 6 months (rescopy)
- Subjects with proctocolectomy
- Subjects with life expectancy < 3 years
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL52708.018.15 |