Compare 3D biplanar with conventional 2D short axis US guided internal jugular catheterization
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Cardiac therapeutic procedures
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
First pass success rate
Secondary outcome
imaging time, procedure time, number of skin punctures, number of needle
redirections, complications including posterior wall puncture, needle
visibility, operator satisfaction
Background summary
Central venous catheterization through the jugular vein is a standard procedure
for cardiothoracic surgical patients. Ultrasound (US) guidance is preferred and
compared to traditional landmark approach decreases complications and increases
success rate. Both long and short axis views are used for obtaining access,
both with their own advantages and shortcomings. Complications have also not
completely diminished with the use of US. We propose a new technique using 3D
biplanar imaging, combining advantages from both long and short axis views in
one image, enabling more successful procedures and a lower complication rate
Study objective
Compare 3D biplanar with conventional 2D short axis US guided internal jugular
catheterization
Study design
Prospective randzomized controlled trial
Intervention
Central venous access with 3D biplanar US guidance
Study burden and risks
2D US guided internal jugular vein catheterization is a standard procedure in
cardiac operating theatres and is a basic skill for cardiac anesthesiologists.
The intervention aims to further optimize this technique and potentially
decrease complications such as posterior wall punctures leading to carotid
artery puncture. Therefore, patients participating in this study are not
exposed to extra risks other than that of the traditional central venous access
procedure.
Michelangelolaan 2
Eindhoven 5623 EJ
NL
Michelangelolaan 2
Eindhoven 5623 EJ
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
adult patients scheduled for cardiothoracic surgery
age 18-85
written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
- Emergency surgery
- Unable to obtain informed consent
- Vascular access via alternative approach (subclavian vein)
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
| Register | ID |
|---|---|
| CCMO | NL76278.100.20 |