The objective is to evaluate the extent of lymph node dissection, efficacy, risks, quality of life and cost-effectiveness of RAMIE as an alternative to MIE as treatment for esophageal cancer.
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Malignant and unspecified neoplasms gastrointestinal NEC
- Gastrointestinal therapeutic procedures
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Our hypothesis is that RAMIE has superior lymph node dissection compared to
MIE. Therefore, the primary outcome of this study is the number of dissected
lymph nodes. The resected specimen will be marked by the surgical team for the
position of lymph node dissection. Evaluation will be performed by an
experienced pathologist using standard protocols. Stage grouping will take
place according to the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) protocol
using the TNM-8 classification. The exact localization of the lymph nodes is an
essential part of the pathologic examination.
Secondary outcome
Secondary outcomes include:
- Overall postoperative complications according to the modified Clavien Dindo
classification (MCDC grade I-V) and definitions stated by the Esophagectomy
Complications Consensus Group (ECCG). Postoperative complications include:
anastomotic leakage, mediastinitis, gastric conduit necrosis, chylothorax and
recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, delayed gastric emptying, pulmonary
complications (pneumonia, pneumothorax, pulmonary embolus, acute respiratory
distress syndrome (ARDS)), cardiac complications (atrial fibrillation, cardiac
asthma, myocardial infarction) and postoperative bleeding. The incidence of
incisional hernias and diaphragmatic hernias will be recorded.
- Length of ICU-MCU stay (days), length of hospital stay (days)
- In hospital mortality (IHM) and mortality within 30, 60 and 90 days
postoperatively will be reported. For all patients, the cause of death will be
noted.
- Pathology results: The pathology report contains the following parameters:
site of tumor, type and gradation, extension in the esophageal wall, margins of
the resection, extent of resection (R0, R1 or R2), lymph node status with the
number of lymph nodes (primary endpoint) (TNM 8)21. Quality control of the
pathologic analysis of the resection specimen will be provided by a specialized
gastrointestinal pathologist.
- Overall and disease-free survival (2, 3 and 5 years). Overall survival (OS)
was calculated from the date of surgery to the date of death or last follow-up.
Disease free survival was calculated from the date of surgery to recurrence or
death related to disease and/or treatment or last date of follow-up.
- Operation time is defined as time from incision until closure (minutes) for
both the thoracic and the abdominal phase of the procedure. Unexpected events
and complications occurring during the operation will be recorded (e.g.
hemorrhage requiring transfusion, perforation of other organs) as well as blood
loss during operation (ml, per phase). In case of conversion to thoracotomy or
laparotomy the reason for conversion has to be explained (absolute
numbers/percentage).
- Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain will be noted at following times:
pre-operatively and the first 14 days after surgery and a fixed periods during
follow up (6 weeks, 6 months and yearly post-operatively up to 5 years).
- Quality of life questionnaires will be required at following times: SF-36,
EORTC QLQ-C30 (Dutch), EORTC OES18 (Dutch) and EQ-5D (Appendix 1 & 2)
pre-operative < 5 days and 6 weeks, 6 months and yearly up to 5 years
post-operatively.
- Postoperative functional recovery was defined as: removal of thoracic tubes,
no requirement of intravenous fluid resuscitation, tolerance for solid oral
intake, the ability to mobilize independently and adequate pain control with
oral analgesics. All items will be assessed daily.
- Cost analysis: The approach for the cost-analysis is comparing actual direct
medical costs incurred with both strategies up until 5 years after the
operation. Costs estimates will be based on the recorded volumes and unit costs
associated with both procedures. This includes the costs of operation rooms,
hospital and ICU stay, costs associated with complications and re-operations.
- Surgeons fatigue assessed by Psychomotor Vigilance tests (PVT) before and
after esophagectomy.
Background summary
For patients with esophageal cancer, radical esophagectomy with 2-field
lymphadenectomy is the cornerstone of the multimodality treatment with curative
intent. Both, conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and robot
assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) were shown to be superior
compared to open transthoracic esophagectomy considering postoperative
complications. However, no randomized comparison was made until now to compare
MIE to RAMIE.
Study objective
The objective is to evaluate the extent of lymph node dissection, efficacy,
risks, quality of life and cost-effectiveness of RAMIE as an alternative to MIE
as treatment for esophageal cancer.
Study design
This is a multicenter investigator-initiated and investigator-driven randomized
controlled parallel-group, superiority trial comparing RAMIE to MIE. This study
is conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki
and Good Clinical Practice Guidelines. Written informed consent will be
obtained from all participating patients. All centers participating in the
ROBOT-2 trial have extensive experience in minimally invasive esophageal
surgery and have an experience with at least 50 MIE an 50 RAMIE procedures
performed.
Intervention
The RAMIE consists of a technique is using the 4 arm daVinci Xi system (daVinci
Xi system, Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA).
Study burden and risks
Risks are estimated to be low, the participating surgeons have performed more
than the requiered amount of robot assisted surgeries to pass the learning
curve. The only burden would be the questionnaires on quality of life.
Langenbeckstrasse 1
Mainz D-55131
DE
Langenbeckstrasse 1
Mainz D-55131
DE
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
- Histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma or
undifferentiated carcinoma of the intrathoracic esophagus (including Siewert I
and II)
- Surgically resectable (T1-4a, N0-3, M0)
- Age >= 18 and <= 90 years
- European Clinical Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0,1 or 2
- Written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
- Carcinoma of the cervical esophagus
- Carcinoma of the gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) with the main part of the
tumor in the gastric cardia (Siewert type III)
- Prior thoracic surgery at the right hemithorax or thoracic trauma
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT04306458 |
CCMO | NL80509.029.22 |