The aim of the study is to investigate the value of DCB treatment of single de-novo coronary artery lesions in patients with stable coronary artery disease, as compared to treatment with DES in a randomized fashion.
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Coronary artery disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The primary objective is to investigate percentage diameter stenosis at 1-year
follow-up as assessed by coronary angiography in patients with a single de-novo
lesion in a native coronary artery successfully treated with DCB as compared to
treated with DES.
Secondary outcome
Secondary invasive imaging objectives are minimal lumen diameter, late luminal
loss, in-segment binary restenosis, and target vessel re-occlusion at 1-year
follow-up. Secondary clinical objectives are evaluation of the occurrence of
major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1-year follow-up.
Background summary
Stenting has significantly reduced the need for revascularization procedures as
compared to plain old balloon angioplasty. Additionally, drug-eluting stents
(DES) have significantly decreased in-stent restenosis compared to bare-metal
stents and its use is recommended in current guidelines. Nevertheless, using
DES carries te risk of in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis, and requires
the use of dual antiplatelet therapy during an extensive period of time. With
the use of drug-coated balloons (DCB), all these problems can be either avoided
or attenuated, while maintaining the anti-proliferative properties of DES.
However, data on the use of DCB for treatment in a general population of
patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) is currently lacking.
Study objective
The aim of the study is to investigate the value of DCB treatment of single
de-novo coronary artery lesions in patients with stable coronary artery
disease, as compared to treatment with DES in a randomized fashion.
Study design
This is an investigator-initiated, randomized,open-label, single-center,
non-inferiority clinical trial. Patients with a single de-novo lesion in a
native coronary artery and accepted for percutaneous intervention (PCI) will be
randomized in a 1:1 ratio to treatment with DCB or DES. Patients in DES group
receive DAPT for 6 months (clopidogrel + aspirin), followed by life-long
treatment with a single platelet inhibitor (aspirin). Patients in DCB group
receive DAPT for 3 months, followed by life-long treatment with a single
platelet inhibitor.
Intervention
After inclusion, patients will be randomized (1:1) to treatment with DCB or
DES. Patients in DES group receive DAPT for 6 months (clopidogrel + aspirin),
followed by life-long treatment with a single platelet inhibitor (aspirin).
Patients in DCB group receive DAPT for 3 months, followed by life-long
treatment with a single platelet inhibitor.
Study burden and risks
All patients included in the trial will have a clinical indication for
percutaneous revascularization. Since there are no randomized controlled trials
which advocate the use of either DES or DCB over one another in this setting,
patients will not be exposed to extra risk due to randomization in the trial.
Contemporary native vessel PCI is associated with low in-hospital events rates,
i.e. in- hospital mortality of 0.9%, vascular complication in 0.7%, procedural
complications in 4.7% and bleeding requiring transfusion in 3.3%.
All patients will undergo coronary angiography after 1 year follow-up and will
thus be exposed to the risks of invasive coronary angiography. Coronary
angiography is characterized by a low complication rate (<0.5%) of e.g.
bleeding, stroke, coronary dissection, myocardial infarction, or death (<0.1%).
Radiation exposure of a repeat coronary angiography is estimated at 5-10 mSv.
Patients participating in the CCTA substudy will be exposed to an effective
dose equivalent ~2.1 mSv. Impact CT Dosimetry software package version 1.04 was
used to calculate the radiation dosage. Furthermore, ionized contrast agents
will be used during CCTA, which can be nefrotoxic and may elicit allergic
reactions.
Expected benefit of this study:
Using DCB for the treatment of single de novo coronary artery lesions may
obviate the use of DES, and therefore reduce the risk on in-stent restenosis
and stent thrombosis and shorten the use of dual antiplatelet therapy. However,
data on the use of DCB for treatment in a general population of patients with
stable coronary artery disease is currently lacking. This trial could provide
this data and therefore influence current guidelines on the application of DCBs
in patients with stable coronary artery disease.
De Boelelaan 1117
Amsterdam 1081HV
NL
De Boelelaan 1117
Amsterdam 1081HV
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
• Age >= 18 years
• Stable angina or dyspnea and the presence of a single de-novo lesion in a
native coronary artery causing myocardial ischemia, eligible for PCI based on a
formal local heart team decision
• Reference diameter of the vessel is 2.5-4.0 mm
• The lesion is suitable for both treatment with DCB and DES
Exclusion criteria
• Dissection affecting the flow (TIMI score<3), significant recoil (>30%) or
coronary perforation after predilation
• Reference diameter of the vessel is <2.5 mm or >4.0 mm
• Bifurcation lesion, requiring a two-stent technique
• In-stent restenosis
• Unprotected left main lesion
• Chronic total occlusion
• Acute cononary syndrome
• Cardiogenic shock
• Severe kidney disease defined as an eGFR < 30 ml/min
• Pregnancy
• Life expectancy < 12 months
• Inability to give written consent
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL80988.029.22 |