Objectives: Primary: to determine whether SRT reduces the seizure frequency resulting in a reduction of at least 75% (RAEC I-III) in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy when compared to standard of care. Secondary: Assess quality of life (…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Seizures (incl subtypes)
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary endpoint: RAEC I - III after 2 year of
follow-up.
Secondary outcome
Secondary endpoints: Seizure frequency, Type epilepsy, Seizure-free days,
Quality-of-Life in Epilepsy (EQ-5D 5 Level, AQOL-8D, QOLIE-31), Serious Adverse
Events (SAE), anti-epileptic drug use, Cost-effectiveness Resource use iMTA
Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ), iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire
(iMCQ), iMTA Valuation of Informal Care Questionnaire (iVICQ)],
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), Patient-reported experience measures
*medische specialistische zorg* (PREM MSZ), neuro-cognition.
Background summary
Rationale: The PRECISION-study offers a non-invasive, curative intervention for
patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who are not eligible for open
brainsurgery. The intervention will consist of a single LINAC-based
stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) treatment and is given by the
radiation-oncologist after detailed localisation of the epileptogenic zone (EZ)
by the neurologist, radiologist and neurosurgeon. This intervention is not yet
available and reimbursed in The Netherlands and will offer the selected
patient, who otherwise would be treated with palliative therapy, a non-invasive
curative treatment option as a non-competitive alternative to epilepsy surgery.
It is expected that the health costs for this curative treatment will not
exceed standard treatment, such as lifelong medication and neuromodulation. We
hypothesize that: SRT is a superior treatment option compared to palliative
standard of care (i.e. anti-epileptic drugs (AED's) and neuromodulation), for
patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, not eligible for open surgery,
which will result in a higher reduction of seizures (with 50% of the patients
reaching a 75% reduction at 2 years).
Study objective
Objectives: Primary: to determine whether SRT reduces the seizure frequency
resulting in a reduction of at least 75% (RAEC I-III) in patients with
drug-resistant focal epilepsy when compared to standard of care. Secondary:
Assess quality of life (QoL) after SRT, define safety, (serious) adverse
effects, AED use and tolerability of SRT, investigate the cost-effectiveness
(CEA) of SRT compared to standard of care.
Study design
Study design: Randomised controlled trial in which SRT is the intervention and
AED continuation and neuromodulation are the standard treatment with a 1:1
randomization to firmly establish QoL and CEA. Randomisation will be based on
block randomisation with variable block size of 2, 4 and 6.
Intervention
Intervention: LINAC-based Stereotactic Radiotherapy (SRT): Target definition:
the target volume is defined as the epileptogenic zone (EZ) on all (non)
invasive examinations of the presurgical trajectory. A single fraction SRT with
a prescribed isotoxic dose of 24 Gy to the 100% surrounding isodose.
Study burden and risks
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation,
benefit and group relatedness: There is currently in the Netherlands no
non-invasive, curative intent treatment for adult/pediatric patients with
drug-resistant, focal epilepsy, who are not eligible for surgery, therefore
there is an unmet need for the innovative treatment that the PRECISION-trial
will provide. SRT for epilepsy is already applied in neighboring European
countries (e.g. France, Belgium and Germany), the USA, China and Japan with
reported effectiveness is 58% post-treatment satisfactory seizure outcome (RAEC
scale I + II = no to rare seizures) at 2 years follow-up.
The risks of the SRT treatment are based on the location of the EZ zone.
Information is available in the literature on the risks of treating patients
with epilepsy, brain metastases or benign brain lesions.
The most common acute adverse reaction of SRT is headache, nausea and/or
vomiting caused by reversible intracranial edema and can be treated with
corticosteroids. Long-term side effects include transient neurologic deficits
and seizure exacerbation, changes in mMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI),
expected and usually asymptomatic superior quadrantanopia (for lesions treated
in the temporal lobe), ischemic events, cognitive changes, and radiation
necrosis rarely leading to symptomatic edema or cysts requiring surgical
intervention.
If the EZ zone is close to the pituitary, potential risks can be estimated
based on the literature on the management of patients with pituitary tumors.
Cerebral infarction has been described as a long-term complication of
stereotactic radiotherapy of benign skull base tumors, mainly pituitary tumors
(SIR 1.48 - 4.2). When treating the amygdala, patients may face a similar risk
due to its close relationship with the internal carotid artery].
In patients with a pituitary adenoma, it is known that hypopituitarism can
occur after conventional and stereotactic radiotherapy in 50% of patients, 10
years after treatment. However, in patients with a non-functional pituitary
adenoma population in 37-85% of patients already have hypopituitarism at the
time of diagnosis. Hormone production deficiency after conventional
radiotherapy of the pituitary gland with 45Gy is 45-100% for GH, 18-30% for
LH/FSH, 15-22% for ACTH and 25% for TSH.
*
Dr. Tanslaan 12
Maastricht 6229ET
NL
Dr. Tanslaan 12
Maastricht 6229ET
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
1. Age >= 18 years, non-pregnant, written informed consent
2. The patient or caretaker is able to keep an epilepsy diary
3. The patient has a diagnosis of epilepsy established by a dedicated
neurologist
4. The patient had at least 3 focal-onset seizures with impairment of
consciousness over a 3-month period despite two or more antiepileptic
medication trials (according ILAE Task Force on therapeutic strategies)
5. Video electroencephalography to determine a well-circumscribed seizure focus
6. Imaging evidence (i.e. 3T-MRI) of the anatomic region to be targeted with
SRT, correlating with the EZ hypothesis
7. A Wada test or a functional MRI to lateralize language has been performed in
selected patients
8. The patient has completed a standard battery of neuropsychological testing
9. The patient been deemed an appropriate candidate for stereotactic
radiosurgery by a dedicated Radiation Oncologist and Neurosurgeon and referred
for the study by one of the Dutch regional multidisciplinary epilepsy surgery
working groups
10. Patients that were rejected for surgery in an earlier stage can participate
in the trial if the treatment with VNS/DBS was more than 4 years ago.
Exclusion criteria
1. If a radiation treatment plan with a V12Gy <= 10 cc in healthy brain is not
feasible.
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
Other | NCT05182437 |
CCMO | NL81166.068.22 |