To evaluate the efficacy of tofacitinib treatment in patients with RCDII with persistent or recurrent villous atrophy (Marsh III ABC) and aberrant IEL T-cells (> 20% as assessed by flow cytometry).
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Lymphomas non-Hodgkin's T-cell
- Gastrointestinal inflammatory conditions
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Primary efficacy endpoint:
- Immunological response, as defined by:
reduction from baseline of aberrant IELs (%) with respect to total IELs in
duodenal biopsies at week 12, as assessed by flow cytometry. A decrease of at
least 20% aberrant IELs will be considered as significant.
Secondary outcome
Secondary efficacy endpoints:
- Histological response, as defined by: improvement from baseline in histology
scores for celiac disease, as defined by Marsh classification.
- Clinical response: changes from baseline in clinical symptoms, as assesed by:
severity of diarrhea (evaluated by Bristol Stool Forming Scale (BSFS),
gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS), celiac disease symptom diary
(CDSD) Celiac Disease Patient Reported Outcome (CeD-PRO).
Safety of tofacitinib for patients with RCDII
Exploratory endpoints:
- Changes in quality-of-life when using tofacitinib, as evaluated by
questionnaire EQ-5D-5L.
- Immunological changes:
track changes in immune subsets in duodenal biopsies and blood before and after
tofacitinib treatment (single-cell CyTOF). Track histological changes in the
small intestine after tofacitinib treatment (IHC; Vectra; imaging CyTOF).
- In vitro tofacitinib assay:
to evaluate predictability of tofacitinib responsiveness with an in vitro assay
(FACS) vs. in vivo immunological response (see primare outcome: change in
aberrant IELs).
- Pharmacokinetics analysis:
to assess tofacitinib concentrations in blood after oral intake (HPLC-MS/MS
assay).
Background summary
Treatment for patients with refractory celiac disease type II (RCDII) is not
optimal, resulting in 5-year survival rates falling below 60%. What*s more,
there is a lack of efficacy for most evaluated therapies in RCDII and 50% of
patients develop enteropathy-associated T cell lymphoma (EATL) with even lower
5-year survival rates of <= 20%. This high risk of malignant transformation
makes it necessary to develop new treatment strategies for RCDII. Tofacitinib
(Pfizer) is a small-molecule drug, inhibiting a broad spectrum of
pro-inflammatory cytokines including interleukin (IL)-15, -2 and -21 which are
assumed to play a role in RCDII. Aberrant intraepithelial lymphocytes (IEL*s)
are the source of this malignancy; our recent data show that proliferation of
these cells is induced by IL-15, -2 and -21. Tofacitinib inhibits signalling
pathways of these cytokines, hereby blocking proliferation of malignant IEL*s.
Therefore, tofacitinib is considered as an attractive drug candidate for
treatment of RCDII patients and prevention of EATL development.
Study objective
To evaluate the efficacy of tofacitinib treatment in patients with RCDII with
persistent or recurrent villous atrophy (Marsh III ABC) and aberrant IEL
T-cells (> 20% as assessed by flow cytometry).
Study design
Phase II, open label, mono-center, pilot study
Intervention
Tofacitinib 10mg twice daily (BID), orally, for 12 weeks.
Study burden and risks
The main goal of this study is to assess efficacy of tofacitinib for patients
with RCDII, a pre-malignant disease for which there is no established
treatment. RCDII patients who failed treatment in standard care are potential
candidates for this study. We hypothesize that by applying tofacitinib, we
achieve better treatment outcomes. There are risks of known side effects, most
importantly infections, for patients will be monitored and visit the clinic
every other week in a 12-week treatment period. At most visits, blood will be
drawn and targeted physical examination will be done. During the 16-week study
period, patients need to fill in a 10-second questionnaire each day about their
bowel moments; 2x 2-minute questionnaires every day about their health; an
extensive 5-minute questionnaire weekly about their health. At a couple of
patient visits, patients need to fill in a 5-minute questionnaire about
quality-of-life. Overall, this will be a short treatment period with extensive
monitoring. To underscore, potential candidates are RCDII patients in which
there is lack of efficacy of other treatments
Boelelaan 1118
AMSTERDAM 1081 HZ
NL
Boelelaan 1118
AMSTERDAM 1081 HZ
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
1. Adult patients >= 18 years old
2. Given informed consent
3. Diagnosis of RCDII
4. Total adherence to a gluten-free diet (GFD) for at least 6 consecutive
months prior to screening. Subjects must also agree to make no changes to their
current GFD for the duration of study participation.
5. Anti-tissue transglutaminase (IgA and IgG at screening < 2x the diagnostic
level for celiac disease (weak positive or negative).
6. In case of female fertile patients: adequate contraception, up to 4 weeks
after final dose.
7. Laboratory values:
a) Total WBC > 0.75 x 109/L (i.e. > 750/mm3)
b) Hemoglobin > 5.5 mmol/L (i.e. 8.86 g/dL)
c) Absolute neutrophil count > 1 x 109 / L (i.e. > 1000 cells/mm3.)
d) Estimated eGFR > 30mL/min/1.73m2 using the Cockcroft-Gault equation.
e) Platelets > 50 x 109/L (i.e. 50000/mm3)
8. PET/CT-scan without signs of abnormalities suggestive for EATL within 3
months.
9. Willingness and ability to comply with study procedures.
10. Willingness to return for all scheduled follow-up visits.
Exclusion criteria
1. Diagnosis of RCDI, EATL
2. Presence of any of the following diagnosis:
a) Severe infection prior to screening (e.g. those requiring hospitalization of
parenteral antimicrobial therapy or opportunistic infections. Specific
attention for treatment with ketoconazol or fluconazole (as well CYP3A4
metabolizers)).
b) Active tuberculosis (TBC)
c) Untreated or inadequately treated latent TBC
d) History within 3 years of opportunistic infections typical of those seen in
immunocomprised patients, such as systemic candida infection; disseminated
herpes zoster.
e) Severe liver insufficiency (Child Pugh Score 10-15).
3. Positive Hep B or Hep C test results at the time of screening.
4. Vaccination with live, attenuated vaccines (such as varicella zoster
vaccine, yellow fever or oral typhoid vaccine) within 2 weeks before start of
tofacitinib.
5. History of significant immune suppression:
a) BMT therapy less than 6 months prior to baseline
b) Potent systemic immune suppressants (e.g., azathioprine, within specified
time periods per immunosuppressant) prior to baseline.
6. Subjects receiving moderate/potent CYP3A inducers or inhibitors in the
specified time periods prior to the first dose of study drug.
7. Screening 12-lead ECG that demonstrates clinically relevant abnormalities
which may affect subject safety or interpretation of study results.
8. History or presence of clinically significant disease that in the opinion of
the investigator would confound the subject*s participation and follow-up in
the clinical trial or put the subject at unnecessary risk (e.g. uncontrolled
cardiac diseases, uncontrolled/chronic pulmonary, renal, endocrine,
hematological, gastrointestinal, immunologic, dermatological, neurological or
psychiatric dysfunction).
i. Specific attention for risk factors for pulmonary embolism, such as:
use of hormonal contraception, heart failure, previous venous thromboembolism,
hereditary coagulation disorder, malignancy, patients who get major surgery.
9. History of drug or alcohol abuse that would interfere with the ability to
comply with the study protocol.
10. History of clinically significant hypersensitivity to the study drug or to
any of the excipients
11. Females who are pregnant, becoming pregnant or are currently breastfeeding.
12. Participation in any other investigational drug study in the past 30 days/5
half-lives.
13. Any additional reason which would endanger safety of the subject for
participation in this study, in the opinion of the investigator.
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
EudraCT | EUCTR2018-001678-10-NL |
CCMO | NL65853.029.18 |
OMON | NL-OMON25125 |