To evaluate the non-inferiority of omitting routine intra-abdominal drainage after distal pancreatectomy on postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo score >= 3), and, secondarily, POPF grade B/C.
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Endocrine gland therapeutic procedures
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Primary outcome is postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo score >= 3).
Secondary outcome
The most relevant secondary outcome is grade B/C POPF. Other secondary outcomes
include surgical reintervention, percutaneous catheter drainage, endoscopic
catheter drainage, abdominal collections (not requiring drainage), wound
infection, delayed gastric emptying, post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage as defined
by the international study group for pancreatic surgery (ISGPS)6, length of
stay (LOS), readmission within 30 days, in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality
and 90-day mortality.
Background summary
Prophylactic abdominal drainage is current standard practice after distal
pancreatectomy (DP), with the aim to divert pancreatic juice in case of a
postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) aimed to prevent further complications.
Whereas POPF after pancreatoduodenectomy, by definition, involves infection due
to anastomotic dehiscence, a POPF after DP is essentially sterile since the
bowel is not opened and no anastomoses are created. Routine drainage could
therefore be omitted after DP and this could even be beneficial because of the
hypothetical prevention of drain-induced infections.5 Abdominal drainage (i.e.
the act of placing a surgical drain), moreover, should only be done if it
provides additional safety or comfort to the patient. In clinical practice,
drains cause clear discomfort amongst patients in the postoperative phase so
the omitting of a drain would benefit them. The only currently available
multicenter randomized controlled trial confirmed the safety of omitting
abdominal drainage but did not stratify patients according to their risk of
POPF and did not describe a standardized strategy for pancreatic transection.
This is relevant since it might influence the outcome of omitting abdominal
drainage. Therefore, a large pragmatic multicenter randomized controlled trial
is required, stratifying patients for their baseline risk of POPF.
Study objective
To evaluate the non-inferiority of omitting routine intra-abdominal drainage
after distal pancreatectomy on postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo score >=
3), and, secondarily, POPF grade B/C.
Study design
Binational multicenter randomized controlled trial, stratifying patients to
high and low risk for POPF grade B/C and incorporating a standardized strategy
for pancreatic transection.
Intervention
Distal pancreatectomy without prophylactic abdominal drainage via a
percutaneous drain.
Study burden and risks
The only other randomized controlled trial showed leaving out the drain can be
done without an increase of postoperative comnplications. This trial involves a
standerdized transsection techique and will be stratified bases on risk factors
of developing a POPF. This way we hope the differentiate between different
groups of patients so we can see which ones won't need a drain anymore.
Patients will benefit from this study in the way that they will not receive a
drain, so they won't have the pain and/or discomfort of the drain. They will be
closely monitored in the ward, as always, and when there is a clinical
indication the will receive a scan to check for fluid collections that need to
be drained.
Meibergdreef 9
Amsterdam 1105 AZ
NL
Meibergdreef 9
Amsterdam 1105 AZ
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
At least 18 years old;
Elective indication for DP, with or without splenectomy, minimally invasive or
open, for all indications
Fit to undergo surgery;
Oral and written informed consent;
Exclusion criteria
o Pregnancy;
o DP as a secondary procedure during gastric or colonic resection;
o Colonic resection required for cancer extension (gastric resection allowed)
o Participation to another study with interference with study outcome;
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL72237.018.20 |