We started to evaluated the feasibility of subcutaneous EEG electrodes in epilepsy patients undergoing VNS therapy in a pilot study. This part is currently finished.Currenrly, we are extending the cohort and aim to identify biomarkers to predict…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Seizures (incl subtypes)
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The primary goal of the pilot study was to test the feasibility of the
subcutaneous EEG electrode. The pilot study will be interpreted as successful,
when in at least 4 out of 5 patients the EEG can successfully be recorded with
the subcutaneous EEG electrode during the first 4 months. Hereby, the following
criteria are defined to determine whether the measurement was successful in an
individual patient:
- The EEG electrode is still correctly placed after four months (two months
after VNS surgery).
- Experienced pain of wearing the subcutaneous EEG electrode at a Visual
Analogue Scale (VAS) lower or equal to 4 (scored at two weeks after insertion
of the electrode).
- Percentage of time that the EEG recording was successfully retrieved of at
least 30% (during the first four months after insertion of the electrode).
- The quality of the EEG signal is comparable to the quality of the
pre-operative 64-channel EEG. This will be assessed and qualitatively described
by a clinical neurophysiologist.
For results of the pilot study (phase 1) we refer to paragraph 8.2.2. of the
study protocol.
Currently we are expanding the cohort to evaluate the predictive value of the
pre-operative ultra long-term EEG recordings measured with the subcutaneous
electrode, the pre-operative resting state 64-channel EEG and pre-operative
MRI. The primary outcome measure for this prediction model is the response rate
(i.e. change in seizure frequency) to VNS assessed with the subcutaneous EEG
electrode.
Secondary outcome
Secondary study parameters of the feasibility study are:
- The patient satisfaction and experienced pain of placing, wearing and removal
of the subcutaneous EEG electrode at three timepoints (directly after placing
the electrode, at two weeks after implantation and after removal of the
electrode).
Secondary study parameters of the extended study are:
- The correspondence between seizures reported by the patients (using diaries)
and the seizures recorded by the subcutaneous electrode.
- Differences in network characteristics derived from 64-channel EEG, and MRI
before and after VNS.
- The effect of VNS on psychological well-being including quality of life,
anxiety and depression.
- The effect of VNS on sleep quality (total sleep duration, time to first REM,
total time in deep sleep measured with the subcutaneous EEG recording).
- The effect of VNS measured on the Clinical Global Impression Improvement
(CGI-I) questionaire.
- Smartphone usage before and after seizures is measured using the TapCounter
app (including tapping speed, the number of apps used per hour and telephone
use per hour) (optional).
Background summary
In patients with medically refractory epilepsy who are not eligible for
surgical treatment, neuromodulation including vagus nerve stimulation (VNS)
remains as a last resort. However, a good response (> 50% seizure reduction) is
achieved in only approximately 50% of patients. At present, we cannot predict
who will benefit from VNS. Ultra long-term EEG measurements have recently
become feasible by using minimally invasive subcutaneous electrodes. We
hypothesize that the combination of this technique with network analysis of
resting state fMRI and 64-channel EEG can provide insight in the brain circuits
involved in the disturbed brain dynamics and can result a significant
improvement in response prediction of individual patients who are candidates
for VNS.
Currently there is no experience with the subcutaneous EEG electrodes in
epilepsy patients undergoing VNS therapy. Therefore, we will start with a pilot
to evaluate the feasibility.
Study objective
We started to evaluated the feasibility of subcutaneous EEG electrodes in
epilepsy patients undergoing VNS therapy in a pilot study. This part is
currently finished.
Currenrly, we are extending the cohort and aim to identify biomarkers to
predict success rate for VNS using pre-operative features from ultra long-term
EEG recordings, resting-state 64-channel EEG, and MRI.
Study design
We propose a prospective observational cohort study.
Study burden and risks
Two months prior to implantation of the stimulator, patients will be implanted
with a subcutaneous EEG electrode.This electrode is inserted under the skin
above the ear under local anesthesia. This procedure takes approximately 30
minutes. The subcutaneous electrode will be explanted 13 months after VNS
implantation. Brain activity will be recorded continously from 2 months
pre-operatively to 13 months post-operatively). During this period, test
subjects must wear the corresponding device and change this device once a day
to charge. The risks of placing, wearing and explanting the electrode are
minimal.
We will further record baseline (2 months pre-operative, before insertion of
the subcutaneous EEG electrode) and postoperative (13 months postoperative,
after explantation of the subcutaneous EEG electrode) 64-channel EEG and MRI
(anatomical, DWI and fMRI). In addition, patients will be asked to keep diaries
of their perceived seizures during the study period. We will also ask all
patients three times to fill in a short questionnaire to evaluate patients*
satisfaction with the subcutaneous electrode and the effect of their VNS and
twice to fill in four questionnaires about psychological well-being.
If the location of the epileptic focus is unknown prior to the implantation of
the subcutaneous electrode, an ambulatory EEG recording of 24 hours will be
made to better determine on which side the subcutaneous electrode should be
placed. Optionally, an app will be installed on the subjects' smartphone which
will record their smartphone use.
If we can find biomarkers from ultra long-term EEG and/or networks from
64-channel EEG or MRI to predict the effect of VNS in epilepsy patients, this
will lead to new clinical guidelines for personalized treatment of
pharmacoresistant epilepsy patients. The number of patients who undergo an
invasive operation to implant a VNS stimulator without any benefit can be
reduced. Therefore, the risk and burden for the participating patients are in
proportion with the potential value of the study.
Koningsplein 1 1
Enschede 7512 KZ
NL
Koningsplein 1 1
Enschede 7512 KZ
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
- Adult (>=18 year) patients with medically refractory epilepsy, who are
candidates for VNS implantation.
- Known with focal epilepsy with a (fronto)temporal seizure*onset zone (as
corroborated by EEG or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) or a generalized
epilepsy.
- A self*reported seizure frequency of at least one seizure per month.
Exclusion criteria
- Prior brain surgery
- Cognitive impairments that causes the patient to be unable to understand the
research purpose and give informed consent.
- Exclusion criteria (for safety issues) to undergo an MRI scan
- Planned or expected MRI scan during the period where the subcutaneous
electrode is implanted
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL73089.100.20 |