The here proposed randomized clinical trial, named *POStoperative INTELLiVENT-adaptive support VEntilation in cardiac surgery patients II* (POSITiVE II), compares INTELLiVENT-ASV with conventional ventilation in patients planned for elective cardiac…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Coronary artery disorders
- Cardiac therapeutic procedures
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The primary outcome is quality of ventilation, which is the proportion of time
spent in three predefined and previously used zones of ventilation (see
Appendix 13.1) in the first 2 hours of postoperative ventilation, as used
before in previous studies of automated ventilation.
See chapter 6.2 in protocol.
Secondary outcome
One main secondary endpoint is:
• ICU nursing staff workload, which is captured by the ventilator software
collecting data on alarms (number of alarms, types of alarm, duration of alarm,
responses to alarm, alarm settings and adjustments, breath-by-breath alarm
data, and any manual intervention at the ventilator) during postoperative care
in the ICU, as used before in previous studies;
Other secondary endpoints are:
• duration of postoperative ventilation;
• patient-ventilator asynchrony requiring deepening of sedation and/or
administration of muscle relaxants;
• proportion of breath spent in zones of ventilation;
• postoperative pulmonary complications;
• ICU length of stay;
• hospital length of stay; and
• mortality in ICU and hospital.
Background summary
1.1 Postoperative ventilation
Postoperative ventilation is often needed after cardiac surgery. Over the last
decades it has become increasingly clear that ventilation has a strong
potential to injure the lungs, and emphasis has been put on using lung-
protective ventilator settings. Lung-protective ventilation consists of
ventilation using a properly-sized tidal volume (VT) to prevent volutrauma and
barotrauma, applying low pressures and energy to avoid energy trauma, and
restrictions in the use of oxygen to minimize the risk of chemotrauma.
1.2 ICU nursing staff workload
Applying lung-protective ventilation can be challenging and is often time-
consuming, as it requires complex titrations of ventilator settings according
to changing and individual needs of a patient, also in patients after cardiac
surgery. This is important in intensive care units (ICUs) that are facing
increasing challenges due to shortages in nursing staff, in particular during
surges of patients in need for respiratory support, as witnessed in the recent
coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Diminished ICU nursing staff is a growing
problem, and every effort should be taken to reduce the workload of often
overtasked and overcharged ICU nurses.
1.3 Automated, or closed-loop ventilation
Automated, or closed-loop ventilation is increasingly attractive for clinical
use, as it improves the quality of ventilation and potentially offers support
to diminished ICU nursing staff. Closed-loop modes are progressively available
on ventilators for use in critically ill patients. With INTELLiVENT-Adaptive
Support Ventilation (ASV), one of the most sophisticated forms of closed-loop
ventilation, those ventilator settings that are typically under control of the
ICU nursing staff are under control of algorithms that form the basis of this
form of closed-loop ventilation. INTELLiVENT-ASV targets ventilation and
oxygenation goals based on lung mechanics, whereby it adjusts, breath-by-
breath, VT, respiratory rate (RR), positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and
fraction of oxygen in inspired air (FiO2). Furthermore, INTELLiVENT-ASV
facilitates weaning by using a weaning protocol and spontaneous breathing
trials. Several studies have shown INTELLiVENT-ASV to be safe and effective
with regard to lung-protective ventilation.
Study objective
The here proposed randomized clinical trial, named *POStoperative INTELLiVENT-
adaptive support VEntilation in cardiac surgery patients II* (POSITiVE II),
compares INTELLiVENT-ASV with conventional ventilation in patients planned for
elective cardiac surgery and expected to need postoperative ventilation in an
intensive care unit for at least 2 hours.
2.1 Primary objective
The primary objective is to compare the two ventilation strategies with respect
to quality of ventilation.
2.2 Secondary objectives
One major secondary objective is to compare the two ventilation strategies with
respect to ICU nursing staff workload, using time and motion observations; we
will also compare the two ventilation strategies with respect to patient-
centered endpoints like duration of ventilation, and length of stay in ICU.
2.3 Hypotheses
We hypothesize that INTELLiVENT-ASV is superior to conventional ventilation
with respect to the quality of ventilation in postoperative ventilation in
patients after cardiac surgery. We further hypothesize that INTELLiVENT-ASV is
non-inferior to, i.e., as good as conventional ventilation with respect to
duration of ventilation and length of stay in ICU.
Study design
*POStoperative INTELLiVENT-adaptive support VEntilation in cardiac surgery
patients II* (POSITiVE II) is an investigator-initiated, international,
multicenter, parallel, randomized clinical trial in patients after cardiac
surgery. The study will be conducted according to the Good Clinical Practice-
guidelines and comply with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki,
national and international regulatory requirements and general data protection
regulations. The study is registered in a public registry and the study
protocol with its statistical analysis plan will be prepublished.
Intervention
The intervention tested is named *INTELLiVENT-ASV*, a closed-loop mode of
ventilation available at Hamilton Medical AG ventilators (Hamilton Medical AG,
Bonaduz, Switzerland) and intended to be used in patients that need ventilation
in an intensive care unit (ICU). INTELLiVENT-ASV is a fully automated mode of
ventilation, targeting the lowest work and force of breathing, through breath-
by-breath adaptation of tidal volume (VT) and respiratory rate (RR), and
positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2)
based on patient activity, airway pressures and continuous pulse oximetry
readings and end- tidal carbon dioxide monitoring. It also uses a weaning
protocol and spontaneous breathing trials to facilitate weaning.
Study burden and risks
Patient burden and risks are low, the collection of general data from hospital
charts and (electronic) medical records systems causes no harm to the patients;
the patient will not experience any discomfort because they are still sedated
during postoperative ventilation in the ICU. INTELLiVENT-ASV and conventional
ventilation are standard care, but will be protocolized in this study.
Wahringer Gurtel 18
Wenen 1090
AT
Wahringer Gurtel 18
Wenen 1090
AT
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
1. aged > 18 years of age;
2. scheduled for elective cardiac surgery; and
3. expected to receive postoperative ventilation in the ICU for > 2 hours.
Exclusion criteria
1. any emergency or semi-elective surgery (precluding informed written consent);
2. any surgery other than CABG, valve replacement or repair, or a combination
(i.e., patients planned for surgery for congenital heart disease, or scheduled
for heart transplantation are excluded);
3. enrolled in another interventional trial;
4. no written informed consent obtained;
5. history of recent pneumectomy or lobectomy;
6. history of COPD with oxygen at home;
7. body mass index > 35;
8. preoperative forced expiratory volume in the first second (FeV1)/forced
vital capacity (VC) < 50% (if available);
9. preoperative arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) < 60 mm Hg (at room
air);
10. preoperative arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2) > 50 mm Hg;
11. preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction < 30% (if available);
12. preoperative systolic pulmonary artery pressure > 60 mm Hg (if available);
13. preoperative left ventricular mechanical support, e.g., Impella®; or
14. preoperative use of veno-venous or veno-arterial extracorporeal support
end of surgery,
patients are additionally excluded if a patient:
15. cannot be weaned from the extracorporeal support; or
16. unexpectedly needs implementation of an assist device
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT06178510 |
CCMO | NL86097.018.24 |