Is biofeedback gait training on the Gait Real Time Interactive Lab (GRAIL) feasible in children with mild recurrent clubfoot over 4 years of age? And to explore the effect in achieving clinically relevant immediate and short-term improvements in…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Tendon, ligament and cartilage disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Feasibility expressed as the percentage of completed training sessions
Secondary outcome
Feasibility other:
General training time, expressed as total amount of minutes training on the
grail
Specific training time, expressed as the total amount of minutes of specific
training (balance, eversion etc.)
Training intensity, expressed as level of difficulty that a child reaches
during the training (task complexity, walking speed, etc)
Experience of the training by the children, parents and grail physiotherapist
Percentage of patients that join the study as part of all patients that are
asked to join the study
Effectiveness;
Effectiveness expressed as improvement in peak foot progression
Maximum voluntary ankle evertor muscle strength based on a physical assessment
using the medical research council scale (MRC scale).
Ankle in-eversion joint angle and peak foot progression after 3 weeks of
training measured with data of real time ankle foot position during walking on
the grail and after six weeks and three months measured with gait analysis, at
the gait analysis laboratory
Gait analysis after six weeks of training on 1. Active and passive range of
motion ankle, knee and hip 2. MRC muscle strength inversion, eversion,
dorsiflexion ankle 3. EMG Muscle activity 4. Unilateral heel rise 5. Foot
progression angle 6. Ground reaction force 7. Dynamic knee hyperextension 8.
Dropfoot in swing 9. Dynamic forefoot supination 10. Equinus in stance 11.
Midfoot break 12. Initial contact 13 Early heel lift, compared to pre training
gait analysis.
Gait analysis data 3 months after stop of the training on 1. Active and passive
range of motion ankle, knee and hip 2. MRC muscle strength inversion, eversion,
dorsiflexion ankle 3. EMG Muscle activity 4. Unilateral heelrise 5. Foot
progression angle 6. Ground reaction force 7. Dynamic knee hyperextension 8.
Drop foot in swing 9. Dynamic forefoot supination 10. Equinus in stance 11.
Midfoot break 12. Initial contact 13. Early heel lift, compared to pre training
gait analysis.
Background summary
Clubfoot in children can be treated successfully by the Ponseti method.
Unfortunately, approximately 11-48% of treated clubfeet develop a relapse
during follow up. Children with a relapsed clubfoot present around age 5 to 8
with a supination adduction gait pattern (Hosseinzadeh et al.,
2017b).Physiotherapy can potentially be useful in improving the gait pattern in
children with a mild relapse and pediatric orthopedic surgeons often refer
children with a mild clubfoot relapse to the pediatric physiotherapist.
Functional muscle coordination training might be able to reduce the imbalance
between in-and everting ankle-foot muscle and ligament forces and thus reduce
the dynamic supination in a part of the clubfoot population. This potentially
will decrease the number of operations (tibialis anterior tendon transfers)
necessary in this population. By our knowledge there are no studies published
that prove the efficacy of physiotherapy in a mild relapse.
In multiple clinical cases we noticed good results with physiotherapy training
(established by improvement in gait analysis before and after the training) but
it is unknown what type of physio-therapeutical intervention have good results.
We would like to know which interventions are effective to develop guidelines
for this patient group.
Biofeedback gait training is a proven method in exercise-based gait
rehabilitation in for example children with cerebral palsy(Booth et al.,
2018a). During this gait training children get real time feedback on
biomechanical parameters such as foot position or joint loading. It is risk
free and associated with lower costs as compared to surgery. While feasibility
and effectiveness of this training is proven in several other conditions in
adults and children, it is still unknown in clubfoot. (Booth et al., 2018a;
Keshner & Lamontagne, 2021a)
Study objective
Is biofeedback gait training on the Gait Real Time Interactive Lab (GRAIL)
feasible in children with mild recurrent clubfoot over 4 years of age? And to
explore the effect in achieving clinically relevant immediate and short-term
improvements in ankle-foot positioning and ankle-foot joint loading patterns
during gait.
Study design
Cross sectional pilot study
Intervention
6 weeks of GRAIL training through games at the Center for Rehabilitation of the
University Medical Center Groningen. We will use both longer existing games
used in usual care gait training and a game specific developed for clubfoot
patients with a mild relapse. The GRAIL uses an instrumented dual-belt
treadmill with pitch and sway, embedded force plates, a motion capture system,
electromyography (EMG) and virtual reality (VR) environment (no VR glasses, but
a big screen in front of the treadmill).
During the training on the GRAIL we are able to give real time visual feedback
on ankle-foot position while walking and guide the child to a more neutral
ankle-foot position. Training sessions target coordination, strength and
mobility deficits in the ankle and foot segments during walking.
- Training dose: 60 minutes, 2 times a week during a period of 6 weeks.
- Exercise difficulty will be gradually increased by manipulating:
• Size of target positions of the ankle and foot segments
• Walking speed
• Task complexity
- Biofeedback gait training will be performed by experienced pediatric physical
therapists and certified GRAIL operators.
Study burden and risks
In this study, we offer GRAIL training as an alternative to conventional
physiotherapy.
Children with recurrent clubfoot suffer from deficits in muscle strength and
joint coordination leading to a downward and internally rotated foot position
while walking. In this study we aim to facilitate a more normal foot
positioning while walking and thereby we might prevent surgery in mild
recurrent clubfeet with GRAIL training. Apposed to conventional physiotherapy,
GRAIL therapy provides real time feedback on biomechanical parameters such as
foot position or joint loading. This might result in more insight into which
exercises are useful in this patient group. GRAIL training is provided by
physiotherapists who are specifically trained to deliver GRAIL training. They
have extensive experience in training children with gait deviations. The GRAIL
is located at the Center for Rehabilitation Beatrixoord (Haren) of the
University Medical Center Groningen.
With the results of this pilot study on biofeedback training on the GRIAL, we
want to apply for future funding to establish long-term effectiveness and do
more research on whether low-end training tools such as wearables can be used
for biofeedback training instead of the GRAIL. In adults wearable biofeedback
tools are feasible with effectiveness matching closely an established
laboratory method (Karatsidis et al., 2018). In the future wearable biofeedback
tools could be used to support traditional physical therapy in children with a
clubfoot relapse at clinics and local hospitals or facilitate training in the
patient*s home environments to make biofeedback training more accessible.
Patients will benefit by receiving a training that might be more specific than
they would receive at conventional physiotherapy. Specific training might
improve the walking pattern as seen in relapse, which even will potentially
decrease the amount of surgery necessary in this population.
The burden for our patients will be the intensity of the training, 2 times a
week 6 weeks in a row at the Center for Rehabilitation Beatrixoord (Haren) of
the University Medical Center Groningen. A compensation of 25 euros per
participant will be given and travel expenses and parking costs will be
reimbursed. The place of residence is taken into account when approaching the
patients for this study. Compared with usual care an extra gait analysis is
performed 3 months after finishing the training program.
Hanzeplein 1
Groningen 6700RB
NL
Hanzeplein 1
Groningen 6700RB
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all
of the following criteria: Patients with idiopathic clubfeet treated by Ponseti
Method with a diagnosis of recurrence over 4 years of age. Can follow
instructions for the biofeedback training and are able to follow the training 2
to 3 times a week for a period of 6 weeks.
Exclusion criteria
A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded
from participation in this study: Patients younger than 4 years of age,
suffering fixed joint contractures in the sub-talar or talocrural joints,
severe strength deficits in the ankle evertor muscles (< MRC 3), secondary
clubfoot, co-morbidities negatively affecting walking function, not able to
follow instructions or not able to follow the training session (e.g. no
transport).
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL86814.042.24 |