66 results
This study will evaluate 2 different treatment strategies : a combination of S 95005 and bevacizumab (experimental combination) and a combination of capecitabine and bevacizumab (control arm) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer…
The primary objective is to determine the incidence of HFS in first line treatment with S-1 compared to capecitabine in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Secondary objectives include a comparison of efficacy.
The objective is to compare the efficacy and safety of masitinib 12 mg/kg/day to sinutinib 50 mg/day
We study whether addition of a radiation boost to standard chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer increases the complete response rate defined as pathological complete response in those who undergo surgery, or 2-years local…
To determine the influence of esomeprazole on the AUC of regorafenib in patients with mCRC or GIST.
Primary objectivePhase 1: To assess the safety and tolerability of Nab-paclitaxel added to oxaliplatin and capecitabine at their currently optimal doses.Phase 2: To determine the anti-tumor activity of Nab-paclitaxel when co-administered with…
PrimaryTo compare progression-free survival (PFS) between tivozanib in combination with mFOLFOX6 and bevacizumab in combination withmFOLFOX6 based on investigator radiological tumor assessmentSecondary• Progression Free Survival (PFS) based on…
The primary objective of this study is to compare a semi-mechanical with a hand sewn cervical anastomosis after esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction for cancer.
To investigate which treatment modality is preferable in patients with an irresectable malignant gastric outlet obstruction: endoscopic stent placement or a surgical gastrojejunostomy.
To compare progression free survival (PFS) of nilotinib and imatinib when used as initial therapy of unresectable and/or metastatic GIST in patients either who have not received prior therapy with TKIs or who have recurrent GIST after stopping…
To compare a fully covered metal stent versus a partially covered metal stent in patients with dysphagia due to an incurable malignant stenosis of the esophagus or cardia.
Primary objective: * To assess the treatment effect on progression-free survival in patients who receive AUY922 on a once-weekly schedule versus patients who receive docetaxel or irinotecanSecondary Objectives* To estimate the overall survival…
The primary objective of the trial is to evaluate whether L-BLP25 administered as weekly subcutaneous vaccinations with or without pretreatment with intravenous cyclophosphamide (CPA) induces a change in immune response parameters (ELISpot against…
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the tumor response of stable disease (SD), partial response, or complete response at at 12 weeks (according to RECIST 1.1 criteria) in two separate cohorts representing molecularly distinct subsets…
The aim of this study is to establish the use of VisicoilTM fiducial markers and kV cone beam imaging for image guided radiotherapy. Our goal is to develop an accurate technique to correct for inter-fraction organ motion based on fiducial marker…
Main objective is to examine the preliminary effectiveness of preoperative IMT high-intensity in patients undergoing oesophagus resection on postoperative pulmonary complications, inspiratory muscle strength/endurance and IC stay compared to…
Optimalisation of the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer.
To compare the conventional Ultraflex® Stent with the newly designed Evolution® Controlled Release Stent for the palliation of patients with malignant esophageal disease.
Primary* To evaluate whether the efficacy of nilotinib is superior to the control arm (as measured by progression free survivalSecondary* To compare the response rate, and time to response, duration of response, and time to tumor progression of…
The purpose of this research is to investigate the effect and feasability of multimodal preconditioning for patients who will undergo esophaguscardiaresection.