21 results
To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine in combination wth 131I-MIBG in pediatric patients with relapsed or progressive neuroblastoma.
Primary Objectives:- To evaluate whether early metabolic response is correlated to clinical benefit (defined as PFS).- To evaluate the effect of age (>= 70 years) on pazopanib pharmacokinetics (AUC0-24hr).Secondary Objectives:- To evaluate…
Primary objectives:• To assess whether secondary GIST mutations can be found in circulating tumor DNA of patients with progressive disease on TKI treatment (according to RECIST 1.1 on computer tomography), whereas they are NOT present in the…
Efficacy of BEZ235 on objective response rate according to RECIST 1.1
The primary objective of this study is to determine the progression-free survival (PFS) rate assessed 12 weeks after the initiation of IMC-A12 monotherapy, administered every 2 weeks to patients with previously-treated, advanced or metastatic soft…
Primary objective ·To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of cidofovir in combination with standard dose of radiotherapy in Human Papilloma Virus-positive head and neck carcinomas.Secondary Objectives·To explore p53-related gene activity in…
The main objective is to determine whether cabazitaxel or prolonged infusional ifosfamide demonstrate sufficient antitumor activity (as measured by progression free survival at 12 weeks) in pre-treated patients with metastatic or inoperable locally…
Investigate whether different resection modalities such as MO or TL cause a different amount of shrinkage in the mucosal margins of resected OSCCs.
Main objective: Proportion of subjects who remain treatment-free.Secondary objectives: - Change from Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) (PROMISPF, EQ-5D-5L)- Safety: Total number of subjects in the safety analysis set with any AEcollected…
This study has been transitioned to CTIS with ID 2024-513032-14-00 check the CTIS register for the current data. Primary:To evaluate the efficacy of NY-ESO-1-Specific (c259) T Cells, alone or in combination with other anti-cancer agents, in HLA-A*02…
Primary:To assess the safety, tolerability and determine recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of NY-ESO-1 and LAGE-1a specific T cells, alone or in combination with other agents, in HLA-A*02-positive participants with NY-ESO-1 and/or LAGE-1a positive…
The overall purpose of this study is to confirm the clinical safety and performance of the AB1 instrument in subjects undergoing bronchoscopic pulmonary nodule microwave ablation procedures performed using the AB1 electrosurgical system.
Primary objective: 1) To evaluate the overall response rate (ORR) after 24 weeks of cemiplimab in secondary angiosarcomas, according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.1 or daylight photography as per WHO Offset Publication…
The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of MR-HIFU as a treatment modality for desmoid-type fibromatosis (DTF).
To assess the safety and tolerability ofBNT141 at different dose levels.To identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or maximally administered dose (MAD) /recommended Phase IIdose (RP2D) of BNT141 based on theoccurrence of dose-limiting toxicities(…
Primary:Phase 1: • To investigate the safety and tolerability, including identification of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of ZN-c3 in combination with gemcitabinePhase 2: • To evaluate the clinical activity of…
The primary objective is to determine the clinical response of propranolol monotherapy in patients with angiosarcoma. The secondary endpoint is to assess the pathologic response of propranolol monotherapy in patients with angiosarcoma.
Dose Escalation: * To determine the MTD or the RP2D of tazemetostat when administered as an oral suspension BID in pediatric subjects with relapsed/refractory rhabdoid tumors, INI1-negative tumors or synovial sarcoma.* To evaluate the preliminary…
To study the feasibility of reducing the dose of preoperative radiotherapy in MLS from 50Gy to 36Gy while maintaining comparable clinicopathological responses.
-To describe the differences in the parameters of physical exertion during physical activity with two different HMEs in both a lab and daily life setting-To asses patients* satisfaction with both types of HMEs