Search for a trial

Recurrence rate of hiatal hernia repair with biomesh compared to repair without mesh * a double blinded, randomized, controlled trial.

The above mentioned literature shows that repair of a hiatal hernia using a mesh gives fewer recurrences than repair without mesh. However, there are few prospective randomized controlled trials that provide clear results about this. The most…

A Multicenter, Prospective, Single-Blind, Randomized, Controlled, Study of the Repair of Challenging Abdominal Wall Defects: Strattice TM in abdominal Wall Repair (StaR)

The primary objective of this clinical study is to compare the incidence of post-repair wound related complications, including hernia occurence/reccurence between challenging abdominal wall defects repaired with Strattice Reconstructive Tissue…

Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic Primary Crural Repair versus Primary Repair with Circular Bio-absorbable Hiatal Mesh Reinforcement in Hiatal Hernia Repair

To define the optimum laparoscopic hiatus hernia repair, ensuring long-term effect with minimal postoperative side effects.

MARS study- Mesh Augmented Reinforcement of Abdominal Wall Suture Line in Patients Undergoing Midline Laparotomy to limit the Rate of Incisional Hernia ( IH) Occurrence

The purpose of this prospective, pivotal, multi-center, single-arm cohort, pre-market, investigational clinical study is to assess the safety and performance of Deternia* Self-Gripping Resorbable Mesh when used for suture line reinforcement after…

Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic Primary Diaphragm Repair with Sutures Alone versus Sutures Reinforced with Mesh for Hiatus Hernia: A Long-Term Follow-Up

To assess the recurrence of hiatal hernia five to ten years after repair using sutures versus sutures reinforced with non-absorbable mesh.