50 results
Primary Objective: To compare overall survival (OS) of subjects randomized to ipilimumab in addition toplatinum and etoposide (Arm A) to that of subjects randomized to placebo in addition to platinum andetoposide (Arm B) in subjects with newly…
This study will be carried out to gain more knowledge about denosumab in patientes with NSCLC. The effect of denosumab in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC and the relation with the presence of biomarkers in…
Primary Objective* The primary objective of this study is to compare the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by Week 19 following treatment with bevacizumab-Pfizer in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin to bevacizumab-EU plus paclitaxel…
The objectives of the Phase 1 dose escalation are:Primary Objectives:* To establish the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and to establish the Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RPTD) for veliparib in combination withcarboplatin and etoposide.* To evaluate the…
The primary objective of the study is to assess whether the addition of oral veliparib to carboplatin and paclitaxel will improve overall survival (OS) in current smokers when compared to the addition of placebo to carboplatin and paclitaxel, in…
Primary Objective To determine whether the combination of Onartuzumab + * erlotinib is superior (in terms of OS) to placebo * erlotinib after standard platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with Met diagnostic*positive non*small cell lung cancer (…
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES Part I - To evaluate the efficacy (as measured by PFS) of GDC-0941 340 mg +carboplatin * paclitaxel (Arm A) versus carboplatin * paclitaxel (Arm B) in all patients with squamous NSCLC -To evaluate the efficacy (as measured by PFS…
Primary Objective: The primary objective for this study is to compare the efficacy of ABP 215 with bevacizumab.Secondary Objective(s): The secondary objectives are to assess the safety and immunogenicity of ABP 215 compared with bevacizumab.
The aim of the current study is to examine the (cost)effectiveness of Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) in comparison with treatment as usual for patients with lung cancer and their partners.
Primary objective:* To compare survival duration of all randomized subjects by treatment arm.Secondary objectives of this trial are to compare all randomized subjects by treatment arm for:* Time to symptom progression (TTSP) as measured by the Lung…
To assess the efficacy, measured as progression free survival, and safety of Selumetinib in combination with docetaxel, compared to docetaxel alone, in patients receiving second line treatment for KRAS mutation negative locally advanced or…
To assess the efficacy, measured as progression free survival, and safety of Selumetinib in combination with docetaxel, compared to docetaxel alone, in patients receiving second line treatment for KRAS mutation-positive, locally advanced or…
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate overall survival (OS) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) subject population defined by this protocol.Key secondary objectives are to evaluate OS in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild type…
To compare the efficacy of two dose levels of erlotinib (150 mg and 300 mg) on progression-free survival (PFS) in current smokers with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC after failure of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.
The primary objective of this study is to compare the Overall Survival (OS) of first-linemaintenance therapy with erlotinib versus erlotinib administered at the time of diseaseprogression in patients with histologically documented, advanced or…
The aim is to examine whether care and treatment guided by structural psychosocial screening leads to a better quality of life and greater patient satisfaction than usual care alone in patients with lung cancer.
Primary Objective: To compare Overall Survival (OS) of subjects with Stage IV/recurrent NSCLC of squamous histology who have been randomized to ipilimumab in addition to paclitaxel and carboplatin versus placebo in addition to paclitaxel and…
The objective of this phase III study is to compare the efficacy and safety of sorafenib monotherapy plus best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo plus BSC for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory advanced predominantly non…
To investigate the efficacy and safety of BIBF 1120 as compared to placebo in patients with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent non small cell lung cancer treated with standard therapy of pemetrexed after failure of first line chemotherapy.
To compare the therapeutic benefit of maintenance pazopanib versus placebo after first line treatment of NSCLC.