210 results
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab 80 mg loading dose followed by 40 mg dose given every other week (eow) subcutaneously (SC) starting at Week 1 compared with placebo in subjects with inactive non-…
The primary objective is to demonstrate non-inferiority of patients bilaterally implanted with the AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +2.5 D MIOL to AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +2.5 D MIOL in the dominant eye and AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D in the fellow eye in binocular…
The co-primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the effect of OMS302 compared to placebo when administered in irrigation solution during phacoemulsification and intraocular lens replacement on: • Intraoperative pupil diameter.• Pain during…
Evaluation of the inflammatory reaction with NSAID and steroid prophylaxis.
To examine features of treatment response on optical coherence tomography in patients who were switched to aflibercept after non-response to previous intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment.
The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate that the IOP-lowering efficacy of Travoprost Ophthalmic Solution, 0.004% (preserved with POLYQUAD) is noninferior to Timolol Ophthalmic Solution (0.5% or 0.25%) in pediatric glaucoma patients.
The documentation of safety and performance of silicone oil as temporary tamponade in retinal surgery.
Primary: to evaluate the effectiveness of two treatment regimens by assessing the average stable maximum best-corrected (BCVA) change from Month 4 to Month 12 compared to Month 3. A treatment regimen will be considered a relevant treatment option if…
The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of an individualized stabilization criteriadrivenPRN dosing regimen with 0.5 mg ranibizumab as assessed by the mean best-corrected visualacuity (BCVA) change at Month 12 compared to Baseline.
The objective of this study is to prospectively evaluate postoperative visual outcomes in a series of patients bilaterally implanted with the FineVision Micro F IOL versus those bilaterally implanted with the AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® Aspheric +3 D…
The purpose of this research study is to compare Systane Balance Lubricant Eye Drops to Preservative-Free 0.9% Saline as necessary to support Systane Balance reimbursement in France.
• To evaluate whether 7-day treatment with oral QLT091001 can improve visual function in subjects with LCA or RP caused by RPE65 or LRAT gene mutations.• To evaluate duration of visual function improvement (if observed) in subjects with LCA or RP…
The purpose of this study is to evaluate if microplasmin is safe and effective when injected into the vitreous without performing a vitrectomy.
To compare one dose of the short acting tropicamide combined with one dose of the longer acting cyclopentolate (c+t) with a double dose of the longer acting cyclopentolate (c+c). To develop a cycloplegics protocol that garantees optimal refractieve…
The objective of this study is to prospectively evaluate postoperative visual outcome in a series of patients bilaterally implanted with the AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® Aspheric +3 D multifocal IOL versus those bilaterally implanted with the LENTIS® Mplus…
To create a registry for paediatric patients with iris-fixated or posterior IOL*s, and the assessment of the long-term effects of implanted, artificial lenses in children.
Primary objective* To evaluate ocular and non-ocular adverse events during the 24-months study period in patients treated with Lucentis (0.5 mg)Secondary objectives* To describe the ocular and non-ocular adverse events over a cumulative 36-months…
To compare visual outcome and foveal function after (initiation of) treatment between patients receiving an RPE-choroid graft and patients with anti-VEGF medication.
The goal is to study the effectiveness of visual stimulation in children up till the age of 8 with ocular or cerebral visual impairment with or without intellectual disabilities.Since the commission explicitly stated that the intervention should…
Part 1: To determine the effectiveness of self-instillation of fluorescein drops by means of the combined E-Box/Xal-Ease device. Part 2: To determine patient satisfaction of the two administration procedures, i.e. Xal-Ease versus E-Box/Xal-Ease.