24 results
Primary Objective* To compare the objective response rate and overall survival of BMS-936558 to investigator*s choice in subjects with advanced melanoma.Secondary Objectives* To compare the progression-free survival (PFS) of BMS-936558 to…
The primary objective is to demonstrate that glycemic control, as measured by hemoglobin A1c(HbA1c) at 52 weeks for LY2605541 is noninferior to insulin glargine, when each is combined with preprandial insulin lispro, in patients with type 1 diabetes…
The objective of the study is to gain insight in the role of endogenous GLP-1 on food-stimuli related CNS satiety and reward responses and the alterations between lean and obese-T2DM individuals. Also, to gain information about treatment with a GLP-…
The main objective of the trial is to show that ABVD-based response-adapted therapy for advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma, with treatment intensification (BEACOPP) in case of a positive FDG-PET after one cycle of ABVD, has non-inferior efficacy…
The purpose of the multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study EFC11628 is to compare the efficacy and safety of HOE901-U300 with that of Lantus®, both given once-daily s.c. as part of a basal-bolus insulin regimen in patients with…
The objective of this observational, randomized study is to examine the efficacy, safety and patient acceptance of the basal plus insulin regimen (i.e. one injection rapid acting insulin glulisine at the main meal added to once daily basal insulin…
Primary:* To compare overall survival (OS) in subjects with advanced soft tissue sarcoma ([STS], one of two subtypes: adipocytic [ADI] or leiomyosarcoma [LMS]) when treated with eribulin (Arm A) or dacarbazine (Arm B).Secondary:* To compare…
The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate the superiority of insulin glargine over liraglutide in termsof percentage of patients reaching a HbA1c < 7% at the end of the comparative period in Type 2 diabetic patientsfailing…
To compare OS in patients with previously untreated Stage IIIc, N3 (unresectable) or Stage IV melanoma receiving dacarbazine plus 10mg/kg ipilimumab (MDX-010) vs. dacarbazine with placebo.
Primary objective:* To compare the clinical efficacy of nilotinib to DTIC, based on progression free survival (PFS), in the treatment of c-Kit mutated melanoma in patients who have not received prior therapy with TKIs.Key secondary objectives:* To…
A pilot feasibility study (n=5) will be performed to evaluate the feasibility (logistics, timing) and safety of administering autologous tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) generated at the NKI-AVL infused in conjunction with systemic high-dose…
To compare the effect of once-weekly dosing of two dose levels of semaglutide versus insulin glargine once-daily on glycaemic control after 30 weeks of treatment in insulin-naïve subjects with type 2 diabetes.
The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate non-inferiority of an insulin regimen using insulin glargine as the basal insulin with Exubera as the mealtime insulin, compared to a regimen using insulin glargine as the basal insulin and…
Primary objectiveTo compare the progression-free survival (PFS) of subjects treated with either pimasertib or dacarbazine.Secondary objectivesEfficacy- To compare the objective response of subjects treated with either pimasertib or dacarbazine.- To…
To demonstrate non-inferiority of Toujeo versus *standard of care* basal insulin therapy asmeasured by HbA1c change from baseline to Month 6.
The objective of the study is to diminish the amount of chemotherapy and/ or radiotherapy for children with Hodgkin lymphoma who are likely to receive too much treatment with current treatment protocols.
The aim of this trial is to individualize and thus to optimize treatment for each patient by adapting it to the individual response. The treatment response is determined by means of FDG-PET after 2 cycles of escalated BEACOPP + 2 cycles of ABVD.The…
To determine whether treatment with MEK162 prolongs PFS as compared to dacarbazine in patients with previously untreated, advanced unresectable, or metastatic NRAS mutation-positive melanoma who are previously untreated or who have progressed on or…
The primary objective is to compare the OS in patients treated with IMCgp100 monotherapy versus Investigator*s Choice in HLA-A*0201 positive patients with advanced UM with no prior treatment in the metastatic setting. The secondary objectives of the…
The aim of the trial is to individualize treatment for each patient by adapting it to early response and to treat only those patients with addiotional radiotherapy who show an inadequate treatment response. The degree of treatment response is…