19 results
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of ocrelizumab in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) who have a suboptimal response to an adequate course of a disease modifying treatment (DMT).
The objective of this observational, randomized study is to examine the efficacy, safety and patient acceptance of the basal plus insulin regimen (i.e. one injection rapid acting insulin glulisine at the main meal added to once daily basal insulin…
The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate the superiority of insulin glargine over liraglutide in termsof percentage of patients reaching a HbA1c < 7% at the end of the comparative period in Type 2 diabetic patientsfailing…
The primary objective of this study is to assess whether the efficacy of ocrelizumab given as two dose regimens of 600 mg (given as 300 mg infusions on days 1 and 15 and 600 mg infusion in the following cycles) or 400 mg (given as 200 mg infusions…
To demonstrate non-inferiority of Toujeo versus *standard of care* basal insulin therapy asmeasured by HbA1c change from baseline to Month 6.
The primary objective is to demonstrate that glycemic control, as measured by hemoglobin A1c(HbA1c) at 52 weeks for LY2605541 is noninferior to insulin glargine, when each is combined with preprandial insulin lispro, in patients with type 1 diabetes…
The purpose of the multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study EFC11628 is to compare the efficacy and safety of HOE901-U300 with that of Lantus®, both given once-daily s.c. as part of a basal-bolus insulin regimen in patients with…
The objective of the study is to gain insight in the role of endogenous GLP-1 on food-stimuli related CNS satiety and reward responses and the alterations between lean and obese-T2DM individuals. Also, to gain information about treatment with a GLP-…
The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate non-inferiority of an insulin regimen using insulin glargine as the basal insulin with Exubera as the mealtime insulin, compared to a regimen using insulin glargine as the basal insulin and…
To compare the effect of once-weekly dosing of two dose levels of semaglutide versus insulin glargine once-daily on glycaemic control after 30 weeks of treatment in insulin-naïve subjects with type 2 diabetes.
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of ocrelizumab (Ocrevus®) compared with placebo in patients with PPMS, including patients later in their disease course.
This Extension study will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ocrelizumab in MS patients who were previously enrolled in a Roche sponsored ocrelizumab phase IIIb/IV parent trial.
The objective of this prospective, randomized study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of HSCT compared to the comparator group (alemtuzumab, cladribine or ocrelizumab) in patients with aggressive relapsing remitting MS. In Norway, the…
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of ocrelizumab in patients with early stage relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).The objective of the Immune Substudy is to explore immunological changes associated with ocrelizumab treatment…
Primary:To investigate the efficacy of ocrelizumab compared with placebo in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis, as measured by thetime to onset of confirmed disability progression over the treatment period, defined as an increase…
This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of a higher dose of ocrelizumab compared with the approved dose of ocrelizumab in patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis.
Main objective:English To evaluate the longer-term safety of ocrelizumab in participants diagnosed with MS who were previously enrolled in Roche-sponsored\ Phase III pivotal studiesSecondary objectives:English To evaluate the longer-term efficacy of…
This study will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ocrelizumab in PMS patients.
With this study we aim to prove that personalized B cell tailored ocrelizumab treatment is non-inferior in the suppression of MS disease activity (clinically and radiologically) compared to the standard (fixed 24 week interval) treatment.