No registrations found.
ID
Source
Brief title
Health condition
Hallux valgus, scarf , chevron osteotomy, RCT, Deenik et al. 2007
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The primary endpoint will be the recurrence rate of hallux valgus and reoperation rate of the same toe for hallux valgus.
Secondary outcome
Comparing the initial results from the study with the long-term results between the scarf and chevron osteotomy.
The secondary endpoints will be the results from the SF-36, Kitaoka /AOFAS rating system, MOXFQ and radiographic measurements IMA and HVA. The IMA is measured as the angle between the line of the first metatarsal and the line bisecting the diaphyseal portions of the second metatarsal. The HVA is measured as the angle between the line from the center of the metatarsal base to the center of the first metatarsal head and the line connecting the midpoints of the proximal and distal articular surfaces of the proximal phalanx.
Background summary
In 2007 Deenik et al published a randomized controlled trial comparing the scarf versus the chevron osteotomy in the treatment of hallux valgus. There were no significant differences after 27 months of follow up. Due to more technical demands of the scarf osteotomy the authors concluded that the chevron osteotomy was the first choice in the treatment of hallux valgus.
The study of Deenik was conducted in the Maasland Hospital, today known as Atrium-Orbis Medical Centre. Since then no other studies have been performed comparing these widely used operative techniques. The aim of this follow-up study is to compare the status of the hallux valgus of these same patients after more than 12 years of follow-up. We will use the same questionnaires and radiographic measurements as the original study as well as the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (12-item MOXFQ). The aim of this study is to determine the long-term effects of both operative techniques.
Study objective
We hypothesize that there is no difference in survival, clinical and radiological follow-up after >12 years of follow-up between the scarf and chevron osteotomy.
Study design
Pre-, 3, 12, 27 months and >12 years post operative.
Intervention
Hallux valgus correction: Chevron vs. Scarf
dr H vd Hoffplein 1
M.G.M. Schotanus
Geleen 6162 BG
The Netherlands
+31 (0)88 4597823
m.schotanus@zuyderland.nl
dr H vd Hoffplein 1
M.G.M. Schotanus
Geleen 6162 BG
The Netherlands
+31 (0)88 4597823
m.schotanus@zuyderland.nl
Inclusion criteria
o Participated in previous RCT by Deenik et al (2007).
Exclusion criteria
o Patients who developed systemic joint disease, e.g. rheumatoid arthritis.
o Psychiatric patients.
o Patients who don’t want to contribute to this follow-up.
Design
Recruitment
IPD sharing statement
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
| Register | ID |
|---|---|
| NTR-new | NL5081 |
| NTR-old | NTR5213 |
| Other | METC Atrium-Orbis-Zuyd : 15-T-55 |
Summary results
Jeuken, Ralph M., et al. "Long-term Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Scarf to Chevron Osteotomy in Hallux Valgus Correction." Foot & Ankle International (2016): 1071100716639574.