No registrations found.
ID
Source
Brief title
Health condition
suicide, zelfdoding, emotion regulation (emotie regulatie)
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The main study parameter is brain activation/connectivity measured with functional
magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during emotion regulation.
For the second objective, the main study outcome will be suicidal ideation (measured with
the Beck suicidal ideation scale) at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after attempt. The third objective is
the difference in brain activation/connectivity between the baseline fMRI measurement and
the follow up scan after 12 months.
Secondary outcome
As second outcome measure we will investigate the brain activation/connectivity during tasks of affective forecasting and reading the mind in the eyes and during resting state.
The Levels of emotional awareness scale (LEAS) and Bermond-Verbal Alexithymia questionnaire (BVAQ) will be used as moderating factors to investigate the association between suicidal attempt/ideation and brain activation.
A secondary outcome measure for the second objective will be a new fatal or nonfatal
suicide attempt during the follow-up period. Therefore, we will ask participants whether they
had a (nonfatal) suicide attempt since the baseline measurement.
To describe the patients and characterize possible subgroups of patients (those who will and those who will not benefit from treatment, objective 2), we will include the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ), Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS), Orbach & Mikulincer Mental Pain Scale (OMMP), Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) and Barratt Impulsivity Scale (BIS), because use of emotional regulation strategies, experience of
pleasure, mental pain, feeling hopelessness and being impulsive are all important factors that could lead to suicidal behavior. Moreover, these variables could be used as regressor in the analyses to investigate their influence no brain activation/connectivity.
Background summary
Rationale: Suicide is an urgent societal problem, with alarming numbers that steadily increase in the Netherlands. However, the exact social, psychological and brain mechanisms underlying the risk of suicidal behavior remain largely unknown. It has been proposed that suicidal ideation may result from altered social-emotional processing, e.g. difficulties in cognitive control of emotion, in the face of adversity. This would lead to a “psychological
pain” that can fuel hopelessness. Another important ingredient of hopelessness is a lack of flexibility to envision positive future scenarios. Feeling trapped in this desperate situation, suicide can be seen as the only solution. To come to the suicidal act some facilitating factors come into play, which we hypothesize to include reduced ability to take the perspective of others (which may reduce empathy in weighing the emotional consequences for close
others). However, the exact nature of this process has not yet been elucidated. In this study,
we will for the first time, examine several key cognitive-emotional processes in relation to
suicidal behavior using brain imaging: emotion regulation, envisioning future positive events
and inferring on emotions of others. In addition, neural markers may identify those patients at
high risk of future suicidality (suicide attempts and/or ideation) and can contribute to the
development of more personalized treatment options by shedding light on the processes
involved. Moreover, it is not yet known whether and to which extent such (neural) mechanisms "normalize" with time and treatment (i.e. are more similar to healthy comparison subjects). Most of the time participants receive a treatment with elements of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) to reduce suicidal thoughts and behavior.
Objective: The objectives of this study are threefold. First, we aim to understand the underlying neural mechanisms of suicidality. Therefore, we will investigate brain activation during resting state and three psychological processes that have been suggested to be of relevance to suicidality, but have not been studied yet using brain imaging: emotion
regulation, positive imagery of future change and inferring on emotions of others. Second, to
identify who is at risk for relapse of suicidal behavior despite adequate application of standard treatment protocol, we will investigate whether brain activation could serve as a marker for future suicidality, including both suicidal ideations and attempts. Third, to understand and target the underlying mechanisms, it is essential to know which mechanisms can be altered and are influenced by the current state of suicidality.
Study design: The current study has an experimental design. We will employ a longitudinal fMRI study in which we will follow a group of recent suicide attempters, patients with comparable psychopathology and a group of healthy participants for one year. The tasks during fMRI scanning intend to measure emotion regulation, affective forecasting and inferring emotions of others. Furthermore, several interviews and questionnaires will be
administered.
Study population: The study population will consists of 46 patients with a recent suicide
attempt (less than two weeks ago), 24 patient controls and 24 healthy controls. The patient
controls and healthy controls will be matched on age, sex, handedness and level of
education. In addition, the patient controls will be matched on psychiatric diagnosis.
Main study parameters/endpoints: The main study parameter is brain activation/connectivity measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during different types of emotional processing tasks and resting state. For the second objective, the
main study endpoint will be the association between brain activation at first measurement and suicidal ideation/attempts at follow-up. For the third objective, the main endpoint will be change in brain activation at follow-up (second MRI scan) as compared to the first measurement.
Study objective
- brain activation and connectivity during emotion regulation, thinking about future events, inferring on emotions of others and rest are different in patients with a recent suicide attempt compared to patient controls and healthy controls
- brain activation and connectivity during these processes is predictive for suicidal behavior in the year following the attempt.
- brain activation and connectivity during these processes change with a change in suicidality in the following year during which treatment according to current clinical guidelines was administered.
Study design
baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
Intervention
treatment as usual (according to current guidelines)
Esther Opmeer
A. Deusinglaan 2
Groningen 9713 AW
The Netherlands
050-3616401
e.m.opmeer@umcg.nl
Esther Opmeer
A. Deusinglaan 2
Groningen 9713 AW
The Netherlands
050-3616401
e.m.opmeer@umcg.nl
Inclusion criteria
All participants (N=94)
- At least 18 years of age and not older than 60, in order to only include adults and
avoid aging related pathology in information processing (Salthouse, 2010) and
brain volumes (Li, et al., 2012), while still including the largest risk group (males
between 40-60 years [CBS, meer zelfdodingen, 30-06-2016])
- Written informed consent
Suicide attempt patients (N=46)
- Had a recent suicide attempt as judged by a psychiatrist (not more than two weeks
ago at moment of scanning) according to the above mentioned definition
Patient controls (N=24)
- Matched to suicide attempt patients on age, sex, education, and handedness
- Matched to suicide attempt patients on psychopathology
- No current suicidal ideation defined by a BSS=0
- Never attempted suicide
Healthy controls (N=24)
- Matched to suicide attempt patients on age, sex, education, and handedness
- No current suicidal ideation defined by a BSS=0
- Never attempted suicide
Exclusion criteria
All participants:
- Presence of a neurological disorder
- A suicide attempt in light of auto-euthanasia in presence of a terminal somatic illness or as cause of a psychotic delusion
- Visual or hearing problems that cannot be corrected
- Insufficient knowledge of the Dutch language
- Not able to undergo 3 Tesla MRI scanning, these criteria include: (suspected) pregnancy, claustrophobia, MR incompatible implants or objects in the body (such as ear prostheses or other metal implants, operating clips or metal particles in the
eye), tattoos containing pigments that form a safety risk, the refusal to be informed (by notifying the participants physician) of structural abnormalities that could be detected during the experiment.
- Medication that could influence the brain metabolism
For Healthy controls
- A past or current psychiatric disorder
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
NTR-new | NL6411 |
NTR-old | NTR6587 |
Other | : UMCG research register 201700152 |