No registrations found.
ID
Source
Brief title
Health condition
1. Diabetes;
2. Guideline adherence;
3. Physiscian-patient interaction;
4. Empowerment.
Sponsors and support
Sport. Grant number: 68 6597 545272 266058 97
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The mean HbA1c level (mmol/l) of the patients in de different intervention groups.
Secondary outcome
Clinical outcomes at the patient level:
Quality of Life SF-20 locus of control and patient satisfaction
Background summary
The clinical results of the study showed that, in both intervention groups, significant gains were found in HbA1c levels, but not in blood pressure levels. In the patient-centred group higher adherence rates were also found in examination of the feet and educational activities. Cost effectiveness analysis showed that cost effectiveness was found with the highest gains in the patient intervention group.
Study objective
A patient centred or a porfessional directed intervention to improve adherence to diabetes guidelines in hospitals are more (cost) effective compared to usual care.
Study design
N/A
Intervention
At hospitals in the professional-directed group (n=4), the health professionals received aggregated feedback on baseline data on their patient population. During an educational meeting for internists, DSNs and dieticians, the guidelines were discussed, promoted and distributed by a national opinion leader in diabetic care. Also desktop reminder cards of key guidelines were distributed, including a nomogram to easily calculate the BMI. Internists and DSNs preferred these reminder cards to locally adapted written protocols. After six months the internists received personal benchmarked feedback on their clinical performance.
At the hospitals in the patient centred group (n=4) intervention activities were addressed to the health care professionals and to the patients. As in the other intervention group feedback was given to the professionals on baseline data. During an educational meeting with a national opinion leader, guidelines as well as the diabetes passports were introduced. Barriers and facilitators to implement the diabetes passports in the clinic were discussed. Like in the other intervention group after six months personal feedback was given to the internists only, but this time on clinical performance as well as on the use of the diabetes passport. For the patients in the patient centred group, additional educational meetings were organised in collaboration with the local patient organisations. Furthermore 4,500 diabetes passports were made available at the four hospitals and waiting room posters, reminders for the patients to bring their passports and leaflets explaining how to use the passport were distributed. The passports were introduced and given to the patients by internists or DSNs during the clinic hours.
Radboud University Medical Centre,
P.O. Box 9101
R. Dijkstra
Nijmegen 6500 HB
The Netherlands
r.dijkstra@kwazo.umcn.nl
Radboud University Medical Centre,
P.O. Box 9101
R. Dijkstra
Nijmegen 6500 HB
The Netherlands
r.dijkstra@kwazo.umcn.nl
Inclusion criteria
In 13 hospitals the first 150 patients with diabetes that came for a checkup at their internists were included.
Exclusion criteria
1. Patients with a short (<1 year) life expectancy;
2. Pregnant patients.
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
NTR-new | NL878 |
NTR-old | NTR892 |
Other | : N/A |
ISRCTN | ISRCTN35851744 |
Summary results
<br><br>
Dijkstra RF, Braspenning JC, Huijsmans Z, Akkermans RP, van Ballegooie E, ten Have P, et al. Introduction of diabetes passports involving both patients and professionals to improve hospital outpatient diabetes care. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2005;68(2):126-34.<br>
<br><br>
Diabet Med. 2004 Jun;21(6):586-91.
<br><br>
Dijkstra R, Braspenning J, Grol R. Empowering patients: how to implement a diabetes passport in hospital care. Patient Educ Couns 2002;47(2):173-7.