No registrations found.
ID
Source
Brief title
Health condition
Safety violations of rolling scaffolds; ladders and stairs; Personal advice; Information; Painting companies.
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Number of safety violations compared to the number of observed construction locations; primary outcome measure at worksite level in two intervention arms and one control arm.
Secondary outcome
Reach (recruitment rate), provided interventions (dose delivered), received interventions (dose received), satisfaction, perceived effectiveness, costs; outcomes related to the two interventions in IC and IP arms
Background summary
Falling accidents are frequently reported as occupational injuries among construction workers. The consequences of these accidents can result in fatal and non-fatal injuries among construction workers. The objective of this study is to evaluate whether the number of safety violations concerning the use of rolling scaffolds, ladders and stairs decreased among construction sites of painting companies after personal advice or information through general means of communication. In a three armed randomized controlled trial, 27 large Dutch cities are randomly assigned to a group that is subjected to ‘personal advice with inspection threat’, to a group that is subjected to ‘information and inspection threat’ or to a control group with ‘inspection threat only’. It is hypothesized that personal advice & inspection threat or information & inspection threat leads to a lower number of safety violations with rolling scaffolds, ladders and stairs compared to inspection threat only. Secondly, the personal advice strategy & inspection is thought to be superior to the information strategy & inspection threat.
Study objective
It was hypothesized that personal advice & inspection threat or information & inspection threat leads to a lower number of safety violations with rolling scaffolds, ladders and stairs compared to inspection threat only. Secondly, the personal advice strategy & inspection is thought to be superior to the information strategy & inspection threat.
Study design
One time point after interventions
Intervention
1) ‘Inspection Threat (I; Control condition)’; I=announcement of inspection on safety rules concerning rolling scaffolds, ladders and stairs through labor inspectorate.
2) ‘I’ in combination with ‘Communication (C)’; C=information (postal and internet) on safety rules concerning rolling scaffolds, ladders and stairs.
3) ‘I’ in combination with ‘Personal Advice (P)’; P=personal (face to face) advice on safety rules concerning rolling scaffolds, ladders and stairs.
P.O. Box 26600
H.F. Molen, van der
Meibergdreef 9
Amsterdam 1100 DD
The Netherlands
+31 (0)20 5662735
h.f.vandermolen@amc.uva.nl
P.O. Box 26600
H.F. Molen, van der
Meibergdreef 9
Amsterdam 1100 DD
The Netherlands
+31 (0)20 5662735
h.f.vandermolen@amc.uva.nl
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion of worksites of painting companies working with rolling scaffolds, ladders and stairs in 27 large cities in the Netherlands
Exclusion criteria
Non-painting construction companies working on rolling scaffolds, ladders and stairs
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
NTR-new | NL4030 |
NTR-old | NTR4298 |
Other | : Pilot Arbovoorlichters |
ISRCTN | ISRCTN wordt niet meer aangevraagd. |