No registrations found.
ID
Source
Brief title
Health condition
All emergency conditions that require mask ventilation.
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
1. Periferal oxygen saturation;
2. End tidal carbon dioxide (CO2).
Secondary outcome
1. Survival to hospital;
2. Hospital O2 saturation & ETCO2;
3. Hospital Bloodgas.
Background summary
This randomised clinical trial compares the efficacy of a handheld pressure regulated ventilator (Oxylator EMX) to the bag-valve device on prehospital EMS patients that require mask ventilation.
Study objective
The Oxylator EMX is as effective as the Bag-Valve device in ventilating prehospital patients (bloodoxygen saturation and carbon dioxide).
Study design
N/A
Intervention
1. Mask ventilation with Oxylator EMX or Bag-valve device;
2. Measuring periferal saturation and end-tidal CO2 with device.
P.O. Box 90151
B. Drinkwaard
Hilvarenbeekseweg 60
Tilburg 5000 LC
The Netherlands
+31 (0)13 5391313
P.O. Box 90151
B. Drinkwaard
Hilvarenbeekseweg 60
Tilburg 5000 LC
The Netherlands
+31 (0)13 5391313
Inclusion criteria
EMS patients age > 18y requiring mask ventilation.
Exclusion criteria
1. Cardiac arrest;
2. Pregnancy.
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
| Register | ID |
|---|---|
| NTR-new | NL231 |
| NTR-old | NTR268 |
| Other | : 0515 |
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN20664878 |