No registrations found.
ID
Source
Brief title
Health condition
orthostatic intollerance in the pre- or postoperative phase in patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement
NL: orthostatische intollerantie in de pre- of postoperatieve fase bij patiënten met een totale heup of knie vervanging
Sponsors and support
Maelsonstraat 3
1624 NP Hoorn
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Heart rate variability
Secondary outcome
baroreflex sensitivity, orthostatic hypotension system assessment(OHSA) and orthostatic hypotension daily activity scale (OHDAS)
Background summary
Background:
Glenohumeral (shoulder) dislocations are the most common large joint dislocations seen in the
emergency department (ED). They cause pain, often severe, and require timely interventions to
minimize discomfort and tissue damage. Commonly used reposition or relocation techniques often
involve traction and/or leverage. These techniques have high success rates but may be painful and
time consuming. They may also cause complications.
Recently, other techniques—the biomechanical reposition techniques (BRT)—have become more
popular since they may cause less pain, require less time and cause fewer complications. To our
knowledge, no research exists comparing the various BRTs.
Objective:
To establish which BRT or BRT combination is fastest, least painful and associated with the lowest
complication rate for adult ED patients with anterior glenohumeral dislocations (AGDs).
Methods:
Adults presenting to the participating EDs with isolated AGDs, as determined by radiographs, will be
randomised to one of three BRTs - Cunningham, modified Milch or scapular manipulation.
Main study parameters/endpoints:
ED length-of- stay
Patients’ self-report of pain
Secondary study parameters/endpoints:
Procedure times
Need for analgesic and/or sedative medications
Iatrogenic complications
Rates of successful reduction
Discussion:
Non-biomechanical AGD repositioning techniques based on traction and/or leverage are inherently
painful and potentially harmful. We believe that the three BRTs used in this study are more
physiologic, more patient-friendly, less likely to cause pain, more time efficient and less likely to
produce complications. By comparing these three techniques we hope to improve the care provided
to adults with acute AGDs by reducing their ED length-of- stay and minimizing pain and procedure-
related complications. We also hope to define which of the three BRTs is quickest, most likely to be
successful and least likely to require sedative or analgesic medications to achieve reduction.
Keywords:
Anterior shoulder dislocation, glenohumeral dislocation, biomechanical reposition techniques,
Cunningham, modified Milch, scapular manipulation technique, length-of- stay, emergency
department, reduction rate
Study objective
We hypothesize that a low heart rate variability and baroreflex sensitivity in the pre- or postoperative phase are associated with orthostatic intollerance when compared to subjects with normal heart rate variability.
Study design
none
Intervention
None
Inclusion criteria
Scheduled for hip or knee replacement surgery
Standard spinal anesthesia
Age between 18–90 years
Informed consent
Exclusion criteria
Heart rhythm other than sinus
History of orthostatic intolerance prior to surgery
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
NTR-new | NL5699 |
NTR-old | NTR5851 |
Other | : HRV-studie |