No registrations found.
ID
Source
Brief title
Health condition
1. Counterfactual thinking;
2. Posttraumatic stress dirsorder;
3. Control perceptions.
Sponsors and support
Student: Tobias Konermann
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Difference score of retrospective control perceptions. Pre- and post-counterfactual control ratings will be obtained by using visual analogue scales ranging from 0 to 100.
Secondary outcome
Content and frequency of counterfactuals. The frequency of counterfactual thinking will be obtained by counting the number of generated counterfactuals.
The content will be classified according to the dimensions:
1. upward;
2. downward;
3. characterological;
4. behavioral;
5. controllable;
6. uncontrollable.
Background summary
Counterfactual thinking (CFT) can be described as considering alternative outcomes of past events and has been found to be positively associated with syptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The present study assesses whether the generation of CFT leads to enhanced retrospective control perceptions over the traumatic event in a sample of trauma-exposed individuals. Differential effects are compared among a group of individuals that are diagnosed for PTSD and a healthy control group. Is is expected that the PTSD group will generate more characterological counterfactuals which will not be associated with increaes in control perception. The healthy control group is expected to generate more behavioral counterfactuals which in turn will lead to increased control perceptions.
Study objective
1. The generation of behavioral and controllable CFTs will lead to increased retrospective control perceptions in both groups,;
2. The PTSD group will generate more characterological and uncontrollable counterfactuals relative to the comparison group.
Intervention
Participants will write down their traumatic event. They will then rate the event on their perceived control over the outcome of the event. After that, they will be instructed to engage in counterfactual thinking concerning the traumatic event by generating thoughts that begin with "What if -?". After performing this task, participants will rate their perceived control over the event again. Thereby, a pre-post counterfactual difference score will be obtained and used as the dependent variable.
P.O. Box 616
Tobias Konermann
Maastricht
The Netherlands
+31 (0)43 3881228
T.Konermann@student.unimaas.nl
P.O. Box 616
Tobias Konermann
Maastricht
The Netherlands
+31 (0)43 3881228
T.Konermann@student.unimaas.nl
Inclusion criteria
History of trauma-exposure.
Exclusion criteria
1. Non-native Dutch speakers;
2. Analphabetism;
3. Comorbid psychiatric disorders (except MDD).
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
NTR-new | NL1028 |
NTR-old | NTR1060 |
Other | : 248878 |
ISRCTN | ISRCTN wordt niet meer aangevraagd |