No registrations found.
ID
Source
Brief title
Health condition
Patients who require TKA as a result of gonartrosis
Preservation, ACL, PCL, Bi-cruciate, TKA
Sponsors and support
Maastricht University, Dep. Human Movement Science
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Rotational degrees of freedom of the tibial implant, measured with 3-D motion analysis after operation and compared between the XP tibia implant and CR conventional tibia implant operated with either the MRI-based Signature™ guide or the Conventional alignment
Secondary outcome
•Comparing operative, clinical and radiological outcome of the operative procedure with Signature™ and/or the conventional standard intramedullary alignment guides.
•Verify the fit, form and practical use of the Signature™ alignment guides.
•To determine the occurrence (and percentage) of outliers in alignment in the frontal, sagittal and horizontal plane of femoral and tibial components. Outliers are defined as deviations >3 degrees from preoperative planning.
•To determine the occurrence (and percentage) of outliers in alignment of the mechanical axis of the leg. Outliers are defined as deviations >3 degrees from preoperative planning.
•Verify to what extend the thickness of the in vivo inserted polyethylene corresponds with the pre-operatively calculated thickness of this insert.
Background summary
The aim of the present prospective randomized clinical trial was to evaluate and compare the rotational laxity and stiffness after TKA with or without preservation of the ACL using 3-D motion analysis for evaluation of rotational biomechanics with the ability to forget the artificial knee joint in everyday life can be achieved as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty resulting in the greatest possible patient satisfaction. We hypothesized that preservation of the ACL would result in better rotational stability than TKA without ACL
Study objective
•Bicruciate preserved tibia tray for TKA is at least as efficient and safe as the conventional tibia tray for TKA with elimination of the ACL.
•TKA with the use of Signature™ alignment guide is at least as efficient and safe as TKA with the use of conventional intramedullary alignment guiding.
Study design
Tibial rotation with Gait motion analysis
• Pre,3 and 6 months and 1 year post operative
Patient Reported Outcome Measures(PROMS)
• Pre,3 M, 6M, 1 Y, 2 Y, 5 Y and 10 Y.
Radiographic evaluation
• Pre,6 W, 1 Y, 5 Y and 10 Y.
Intervention
The Vanguard™ XP total knee system is a cruciate retaining design that allows for the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) to be preserved while incorporating geometry to accommodate and enable the natural function of the ligaments of the knee.
The Vanguard XP implant will be compared with the Vanguard CR implant. The Vanguard™ Complete Knee System features complete interchange ability and multiple sizing options making it the most comprehensive total knee system available, allowing surgeons to provide personalized patient care due to independent fit of the femoral, tibial and patellar components without preservation of the ACL
dr H vd Hoffplein 1
M.G.M. Schotanus
Geleen 6162 BG
The Netherlands
+31 (0)88 4597823
m.schotanus@zuyderland.nl
dr H vd Hoffplein 1
M.G.M. Schotanus
Geleen 6162 BG
The Netherlands
+31 (0)88 4597823
m.schotanus@zuyderland.nl
Inclusion criteria
•Cemented application of components
•Patients with pre-existing contra lateral knee surgery
•Painful and disabled knee joint resulting from osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or traumatic arthritis where one or more compartments are involved
•Correction of varus, valgus, or posttraumatic deformity
•Sufficient soft tissue surrounding the knee, including the ACL and PCL (based on MRI)
•High need to obtain pain relief and improve function
•Body-mass-index (BMI) <35
•Ability and willingness to follow instructions, including control of weight and activity level, and to return for follow-up evaluations.
•Consent form read, understood and signed by patient.
Exclusion criteria
•Cement less application of components
•BMI greater than or equal to 35
•Use of Anterior Stabilized Bearings or Posterior Stabilized Bearings
•Patients with severe pre-operative varus or valgus deformity greater than or equal to 15 degrees
•Correction or revision of previous joint replacement procedure on index knee
•Sepsis
•Osteomyelitis
•Active infection in knee
•General infection
•Distant foci of infections which may spread to the implant site
•Failure of previous joint replacement
•Pregnancy
•Previous major knee surgery, except for arthroscopic meniscectomy.
•Metal near knee joint (MRI-scan not possible)
•Rheumatoid arthritis
•Extension deficit of more than 15 degrees
•Flexion less than 100 degrees.
•Non-correctable varus axis
•Cruciate ligament insufficiency (based on MRI)
•Rapid joint destruction, marked bone loss, or bone resorption apparent on roentgenogram
•Uncooperative patient or patient with neurological disorders who is incapable of following directions
•Osteoporosis
•Metabolic disorders which may impair bone formation
•Osteomalacia
Design
Recruitment
IPD sharing statement
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
| Register | ID |
|---|---|
| NTR-new | NL4980 |
| NTR-old | NTR5118 |
| Other | CCMO: NL51534.096.14 : IRB: 14T164 |