No registrations found.
ID
Source
Health condition
Fiscal policies to improve diet have emerged as apparent effective interventions to counteract overweight and obesity and non-communicable diseases such as diabetes type 2, cardiovascular diseases, musculoskeletal disorders and some types of cancer. Furthermore, consumption of red and processed meat is linked to non-communicable diseases such as cardiovascular disease, colorectal cancer and type 2 diabetes. The consumption of less meat has a risk reducing effect on microbial food safety.
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Meat purchases per household per week
Secondary outcome
Secondary outcome measures will be type of meat purchases, other protein sourced food purchases (such as meat substitutes, fish, nuts, legumes), purchases of food groups other than meat, healthiness of the total shopping basket (according to Nutri-score), greenhouse gas emission (kg CO2-equivalents), blue water use (M3) and land use (m2 per year) of the total shopping basket and price of the shopping basket.
Descriptive statistics for the following outcome measures will also be presented: food groups (total unit food items within NEVO food groups), amount in kg, energy, carbohydrates, fat, protein, fiber, sodium and total expenditure in euro.
Background summary
Potential demand site food policies aiming at a transition from animal to more plant-based food consumption patterns need to be investigated as such a transition will have consequences for, amongst others, human health, food safety, the environment. Fiscal policies such as meat taxation may be an effective policy option to reduce meat purchases. Current policies for meat reduction objectives are few and mainly of the information type. Therefore, the aim of the present randomized controlled trial is to measure and compare the effect of potential demand side policy options (taxation, information) for meat reduction on consumer purchasing in a virtual supermarket. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the following conditions: a meat tax condition, an information condition, a combination of a meat tax and information condition, or a control condition.
Study objective
Our hypothesis is that less meat will be purchased in the meat tax condition, the information condition and in the combined condition (tax and information condition) compared to the control condition. We expect the largest reduction in meat purchases in the combined condition, followed by the meat tax condition and the information condition.
Study design
One time point. Participants will visit the virtual supermarket once and complete a questionnaire afterwards.
Intervention
In the virtual supermarket, participants will be randomly assigned to one of the following conditions:
(i) Meat tax condition. In this condition, the taxation of meat results in an 30% price increase at the consumer/food purchase level. A price increase of 30% for meat through a tax could lead to a net societal benefit for the Netherlands (Broeks, M.J., Biesbroek, S., Over, E.A.B. et al. A social cost-benefit analysis of meat taxation and a fruit and vegetables subsidy for a healthy and sustainable food consumption in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health 20, 643 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08590-z). In this condition participants will be informed about the meat tax to reflect a realistic situation.
(ii) Information condition. In this condition, participants will receive an informative message about the impact of meat consumption on the planet before entering the Virtual Supermarket. Participants are informed to illustrate a informative policy.
(iii) Meat tax and information condition. In this condition, the taxation of meat results in an 30% price increase at the consumer/food purchase level and participants will receive an informative message about the impact of meat consumption on the planet before entering the Virtual Supermarket. In this condition, participants will be informed about the meat tax to reflect a realistic situation.
(iv) Control condition. In this condition, regular prices will be used. The control condition will also be used for the purpose of another randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax on consumer purchases (NL8616).
Reina Vellinga
+31650059972
reina.vellinga@rivm.nl
Reina Vellinga
+31650059972
reina.vellinga@rivm.nl
Inclusion criteria
Participants are eligible for inclusion in the study if they meet the following criteria: (i) being 18 years or older, (ii) being familiar with the Dutch language, (iii) being largely/totally responsible for grocery shopping, and (iv) having access to a laptop or computer.
Exclusion criteria
People who do not comply with the inclusion criteria.
Design
Recruitment
IPD sharing statement
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
NTR-new | NL8628 |
Other | The Research Ethics Review Committee (BETHCIE) of the Faculty of Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam : 20205 |